Environmentalists" IMMORAL

You think I don't "dare" call environmentalists immoral? Think again. This blog has previously shown you that environmentalists have human blod on their hands (from starving people in the name of "global warming" to killing people because of refusal to use pesticides against malaria, reducing the fight against malaria in the 21st Cetury to MOSQUITO NETTING). Of course I would dare to call these people "immoral", since they are. No, I am not talking about ALL people who call themselves "environmentalists", but neither am I talking about a small group. I am basically talking aobut every peron who regartds "global wqarming" as a "crisis" requiring us to shut down our carbon based industril civilization.


Why is this immoral? Well, I must digress to explain fully. I have previously explained how my self-image took a severe, body blow when I discovered that I am MORE of a fremiinst than most leftists. That revelation came from the treatment leftists gave, and continue to give, people like Sarah Palin, as well as the treatment they gave MY CANDIDATE, Hillary Clinton. Well, environmentalists have caused me to experience a similar revelation, and at a similar cost to my self-image. Yes, I care MORE for the world's poor than your "global warming" type environmentalist! I don't know how many more blows my self-image can take.


Yes, the willingness of invironmentalists to kill off people in Africa with malaria is part of this revelation, but only a minor part. No, this whole "global warming" scam is the major revelation. Despite attempts to turn this scam into a leftist war on the "rich" (see the blog entry a week or so ago), there is one thing that is clear about greenhouse gases. The WORLD is going to have to REMAIN POOR, or our emission of greenhouse gases is going to increase. China is right about this--not about saying it is a "rich" nation problem but about attempts to "cure" "global warming' being a way to keep the people of China (not to mention India, South America, Africa, etc.) POOR> That is the reason that major INCREASES of greenhouse has emissions are coming from China and INdia. There is no way for the people of those countries ot have a truly better standard of living, and to, at the same time, reduce worldwide emissions of greenhouse gases.


It does not matter, essentially, what the United States does. We can reduce our greenhouse gases, and it will hardly make a dent in the world's emission of greenhouse gases--so long as the economies of Cina and INdia continue to grow.


That is why environmentalists are immoral. They want to condemn the world's poor to remainging poor FOREVER. What happens if all o fthe world reaches the standard of living of the United States? Greenhouse gase emissions INCREASE. 100% guaranteed. No matter what we do--although what we do may have a role in bringing down the world economy, and immorally imposing poverty on the entire world. Paul Rodriguez asked environmentalist leftists, in California, how they expected farm workers to have a job if they refused to let farmers have WATER (for "evironmental" reasons?). Rodriguez could not understand why leftists could not see that no farms means no farm workers. Well, this is merely a small part of the overal leftist campaing against our industrial civilization. No industry means no workers. And to recue greenhouse gases worldwide means condemning the poor to remain poor. I agree with China. This is IMMORAL.


Q.E.D. Environmentalists are immmoral.


Luckily for the people o fChina, Chia has no intention of condemning its people to perpetual poverty. China will not agree to be bound by any real "global warming" restrictions. Now what China is willing to do--although even this may be short sighted--is to let the "rich" countries of the West, like the United States, destroy THEIR econmies on the cross of "global warming". Unfornately for China, this might hutr the market for Chinese goods, and sink the world economy. But China evidently thinks it would be worth it to ensure Chinese dominance of the Earth.


Now the world is no longer "warming"--making this all a complete fraud on the part of leftist environmentalists. That is because the SUN has more effect on the mythical "temperature of the Earth" than does any of man's actiivities. Further, if we really regarded "global warming" as a "crisis", there are CRISIS measures we could take (without destroying the world's economy and doooming the world's poor to a lifetime of misery, starvation, and early death). We could spread reflective surfaces acroos areas of the Earth. Don't laugh. At least one city--I don't think in the U.S., but I don't remember exactly--now REQUIRES the roofs of houses to be WHITE> We could do a lot better than that in spreading reflective material over substantial areas--even possibly in space. We could throw particles into the atmosphere to simulate a volcano.


Now the above "risis" measures would be a DISASTER if the world is now COOLING (as it may now be). They might trigger an ICE AGE. However, if we really regarded "global warming" as a "criis", thhere are things we can do which do not destroy our industrial civilization--condemning the world's ppor to that life of perpetual misery. And for you leftists who think that the United States, and other "rich" nations", can TAKE CARE of the poor of the entire world, I have nothing but pity, God only knows what substances you have to be on, or what congenital brain damage you have to have, to think that badly. The ONLY way for "poor" natiions to become "rich" is to improve their own economies. That means emitting MORE greenhouse gases.


I have said before, and will continue to say (because it is true): I we are DOOMED in the event we don't reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, then we are DOOOMED. That is because the WORLD (the only thing that matters here) is not going to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.


All is not lost, unless Al Gore is your high priest. As stated, the world is no longer warming, FOR ANY REASON (mcuh less the activities of man), and we are probably not doomed. If, by some miracle, Al Gore is right, then we ARE dommed. No measures now seriously contemplated by the countries of the world. would change that, since none would really reduce the worldwide emission of greenhouse gases (unless the economy of the world is truly ruined, in which case envrionmentalists may have the death of BILLIONS on their hands--blood indeed).