Federal Judges: Dictators in Black Robes--Are They Also Killers and Rapists (Morally)? Federal Judges Oreder Release of Manson Faminly?

Federal judges order California to release 43000 inmates Street ...
Aug 5, 2009 ... “The constitutional deficiencies in the California prison system's medical and mental health system cannot be resolved in the absence of a prisoner release order,” the judges concluded. ...www.streetgangs.com/?p=946 - 11 hours ago - Similar -


Okay, I have had it with these leftist DICTATORS in the Federal Judiciary (nope, no different from Hitler or that nut job running North Korea, in CONCEPT--although obviously not in the extreme degree of those monsters).


Yep. I DO know more Constitutional Law than these FEderal Judges, even if I am not as expert in baseball (rom an objective point of view) as Toney LaRussa (see previous entry today). I AM an expert in Constittutional Law, and I say that not because I got the highest grade in my class att he Univeristy of Texas School of Law class in Constitutional Law taught by Lino Graglia (sp.?--a long time ago--a very smart man, if obnoxious). No, I am an expert in Constitutional Law because I have made virtually a lifelong sudy of the subject. Byt tiy dib;t beed ti jbiw nuch Constitutiional Law to know what is going on here. It is NOT Constitutional Law (in any objective sense). This is DICTATORSHIP by Federal Judges imposing their personal views on the country (or, in this case, California). This is what Sotomayor DENIED she would do. Everyone (including leftists) thinks she lied aboutt hat. This would be a good test case for her.


Does the Constitution really allow Federal Judges to ORDER the release of 43,000 prisoners--NOT because of any defects in the conviction of those prisoners but because of "deficiencies" in medical and mental health care? Nope. Not a chance. This is USURPATION of power by Federal Judges out of control. It is an UNCONSITUTIONAL USURPATION OF POWER, Yep. These judges should be IMPEACHED for unconstitutional crimes against the Constitution.


For that matter, does the Constitution guarantee prisoners better medical/mental health care than is "guaranteed" to the general population? Don't be silly. Note that I am NOT saying that California should not provide prisoners with medical care, which I am sure it DOES. But to say this is an issue of Constitutional Law (whether "cruel and unusual" punishment, due process, or any other screwball theory) is FALSE. The Constitution was never meant to be this kid of vehicle for DICTATORSHIP, or this type of social engineering to fit the personal views of judges (to put it slightly less harshly, but meaning the same thing as DICTATORSHIP). This is an absolutely absurd decision, and another example of judges building on decisions of other leftist judges rather than fairly considering (neutrally) the Constitution itself.


Let us go to the second part of the headline, and I really mean it As I say, I have had it with this kind of dictator (here dictators) in black robes. Are these judges just as guilty as killers and rapists if they force California to release killers and rpaists who proceed to kill and rape inocent people? Damn right these jduges are jsut as guilty of any crimes commited by the peop[le they UNCONSTITUTIONALLY are forcing to be released as the criminals themselves I dearly hope SOMEONE (preferably many "someones") will TRACK any crimes committed by prisoners released by order of these dictators in black robes.


Did you know that the MANSON "family" (muerders of Sharon Tate and several others) is actually coming up regularly for possible REALEASE (parole) in California. If you ever wanted a conclusive argument FOR the death penalty, the combination of those killers being "eligible" for RELEASE, and this judicial decision, is a CONCLUSIVE argument for the death penalty. They were, by the way, mostly sentenced to death, but the JUDGES in California eliminated the death penalty in California. As I have repeatedly stated, leftists do NOT believe in democracy.


I have also repeatedlyl shown you that leftists generally have BLOOD (F INNOCENATS ON THEIR HANDS. This is yet anotehr example of an attemt to kill innocent people by leftist judges. I am NOT talking about the criminals in prison, but their victims after they are prematurely released from prison. You have to clarify these things for lefitsts like these judges, and nancy Pelosi. They are DUMB.


What is really going on here? Yes, I do know. Oh, leftists like to "coddle" prsioners, and make up "Constitutional rights" for them. But what is really going on here is that leftists do not like PRISONS. They do not think AnYONE should be in prison. They think EVERYONE convicted of a crime should be TREATED in a treatment facility. Leftists do NOT believe in punishment. Ye. I know these people like I know every inch of my glorious naked body (stealing Rush Limbaugh's line). These judges would declare PRISONS uncosntitutional if they thought they could get away with it, and it is there ultimate aim. They WANT prisoners released, and the medical/mental helath "concern" is merely an EXCUSE to do what they want to do anyway. Oh, they want the treatment TOO--to their specifications as dictators--but they don't want people in prison.


You may have noticed how this again proves that leftists are the worst, most santimonious, smarmy, HYPOCRITES to ever walk the Earth. Yes, I am sure you remember the argumetn leftists make against the death penalty. Lief in prison without pearole is actually MORE punishment--so goes the argument--without the state having to kill anybody (except over 30, 40, or 50 years, assuming they are not killed by other prisoners first).


HYPOCRISY. Lefsits (in general, and specifically including these judges) do NOT believe in life in prison EITHER. They are industrial grade, dishonest HYPOCRITES.


Have I made it clear to you what I think of these judges, and this decision? I hope so.


P.S. The above "sumary" of the decsion is the Google search entry, which is accurate. I heard the same story on CBS radio this morning, and did hoped it was not true (while knowing it was). It MIGHT be appealed, but these judges hope for some "compormise" by leftist California where this case never really gets heard on appeal. I KNOW these people. Failing that, of course, the judges hope there will be enough leftists higher up to let this decision stand. People in Californis should CRUCITY any California official who fails to appeal this decision to the very end. This kind of decison SHOULD bring discredit and dishonor to our judiciaary. I am ashamed to have once been a lawyer, and to have shared the same profession with these judges.