Andrea Mitchell Is a Whore--Forever

There is just no doubt about it. Andrea Michell IS a whore. That was the title of one of my previous entries, and no title has ever been more accurate. It is meant figuratively, of course, and not literally, but NEVER has any figurative statement been so accurate.


Yep. She proved it again today, and also proved the accuracy of my statements about Newt Gingrich today, and his "retraction" of his description of Sonia Sotomayor as a racist. the media, of course--as Newt knew they would--took Newt's "retraction" as a full surrender, even though he did not withdraw the substance of what he had said.


Do you doubt that this is an orchestrated campaign by the mainstream media, and Angera Mitchell as one of their chief WHORES, to support Sotomayor? Don't. .


Yes, guess what Andrea Mitchell just said about Rush Limbaugh? She reported, basically, that Rush Limabaugh had RETRACTED (jsut like Newt) his criticism of Sotomayor. If you know Rush, of course, you know that Andrea Michell just proved herself a WHORE. You should know that Andrea MItchell and MSNBC are distorting what LImabugh said, without even hearing what really happened. Inddeed, Andrea Mitchell said that Rush was obviously regretting "going overbooard" (the meida "spin" here about criticism of Sotomayor). You just can't be any more of a WHORE than that. (No, by the way, I am NOT a hypocrite. I do not listen to Andrea Mitchell. I heard her say this on Rush Limbaugh's radio lprogram, which played her comments).


What really happened, if you are not a journalistic WHORE? Well, what Rush said is that he might actually support Sotomayor if he is cconvinced she is "pro-life". Rush did NOT "retract" anything he had previously said. He merely suggested that it might be worth having a racist on the court, if she were pro-life, considering that we are going to get a leftist (probably a racist, as most are) on the Court not matter what. Conservatives want the LEAST objectionalbe judge. We KNOW that we are going to get an objectionable, leftist appointee. . See my own entry on Sotomayor and abortioni, where I pretty much say what Rush says. He does not believe she will be "pro-life" either, but she IS Catholic with a lack of a record on abortioin. I she really believes in her religion, as many leftist Catholics do not, she SHOULD be "pro-life". We know, for example, that Sotomayor is DIVORCED, which means she does not believe that much in her religion.


Rush Limbaugh had a specific message for Andrea Michell (whore) and MSNBC today. He said that if they were interested in acuracy (they are not, only in advocacy), then they should clarify what Limaugh said. Here is what LImabugh suggested: "Rush Limbaugh says that he will support Sotomayor for the Supreme Court if she is a "PRO-LIFE RACIST."


I ould support her, too, under those circumstances. Like Limbaugh, however (who was really merely trying to make the left uncomfortable), I reallly don't believe Sotomayor is pro-life, or that she will vote that way on the Supreme Court.


The main point: It is a complete misrepresentation to suggest Limbaugh has backed off his criticism of Sotomayor--just as my own entry on her lack of a pro-aborton record did not represnt a "backing off" on my part.


Q.E.D. Andrea Michell, and ALL of MSNBC, ARE journalistc WHORES.


P.S: Notice how there is no suggestioni that Sotomayor is a HYPOCRITE becaue of her divorce and possible refusal to follow her church's teaching on abortioin. Look at my entry less than a week ago, where I again proved the absolute hypocrisy of the mainstream media. CBS, on "60 Minutes", asked Mitt Romney and his wife if they had followed the Mormon Chruch's strict morality on premarital sex. In other words, Mitt Romney was asked whether he had premarital sex with his presnet wife, with the obvious aim of suggesting Romney might be a hypocrite (and a subsidiary purpose of suggesting that the Mormon Church is extreme, even though hypocritical "mainstream" Christian religious supposedly have the same belief, but everyone knows they "wink" at this as archaic and not up to the standards of a "modern" God). Well, as Sotomayor not PROVEN herself a hypocrite, and someone who does not believe in her own religion? Let me be cearl. I don't CARE about HER. I CARE about the outrageous hypocrisy of a media how thinks it is "relevant" whether Mitt Romney obeyed his religion on premarital sex, but regards it as irrelevant whether Catholic politicians and appointees follow their own relgiion. Turst me. I WILL meet these people in Hell (Andrea Mitchell and the rest), assuming Hell exists.