Yes, the mainstream media confirms what this blog says, even without realizing it.
I heard the "news" on CBS radio this morning (alarm set on that station). One of the lead stories was that the fastest growing "racial" group in this country is "multiracial". This apparently means that the percentage of people checkijng more than one box on questions as to race is growing faster than any other group.
What has this blog been telling you for five years or so? I have been telling you that we are a nation of MONGRELS, where it is ridiculous to discriminate against "white" males on the basis of race. See yesterday's entries in this blog about the racism of Sonia Sotomayor. I said the same thing in my "guest column" published in The Daily Texan (student nwespaper of the University of Texas) in approximately 1972. Almost all of us are "multiracial". There is NO adquate definition of what is "black" and what is "white" (much less which category "Hispanci" or "latino" falls in).
That CBS "news" report even labeled President Obama as "multiracial", as he is. So am I--with at leasst ASOME percentage of "nNative American" "blood". My daughers, of course, are 50% Mexican-American, along with whatever percentage of Native American "blood" they have.
You see what this means, don't you? It means that Sonia Sotomayor, and most leftists, are not only racist, but stupid. What ssense does it make to discriminate in favor of "multiracial" people, and against "white" males, when MOST of us are multiracial", with that category increasing every day.
Let us go back to Sonia Sotomayor, and her insistence that "latina" females are superior to "white" males. Latina femalses and males are WHITE (Caucasian), in some proportion or other. In other words, CBS News is STUPID (but we already knew that). "Latina" or "latino" is NOTG a "race". What are these people? Right. They are just like me and my daughters. They are of MIXED race--a mixture of white Eurpopean (primarily Spanish) and Indian ("Native American). It is acknowledged that Hsipanics are the fastest growing group in this country. Therefore, it has been OBBVIOUS for DECADES that "multiracial" is the fastest groeing group in this country. What people say on a from is irrelevant. In fact, I recoomend that my daughters not complicate matters by declaring themselves "white" AND "latina". They need to check "latina", because of all of the Sotoamayors and leftists in the country. I have no shame in recommending that EVERY "white" male and "white" female in this country--almost always of "mixed" race--check a "minority" box. Obviously, all kinds of "white" people identify with Obama (including the Republican "establishment"). If you FEEL "black", or "Native American", why not check that box? There is NO definiton of who is "black" nd who is "white"--much less of what "latinos" and "latinas" are.
We come to Scientific American? Am I going to call Scientific American a RACIST magazine, which you should avoid just like you avoid the Ku Klux Klan? Damn right I am, and iI did so to their face (in a letter) mroe than 5 years ago (making many of the same points I made in The Daily Texan, and have made in this blog.
Scientific American ran one of those stories about how "white' people are soon going to be a MINORITY in this country. I can't tell yo how RACIIST that kind of story is, and how RACIST the "scientists" are who publish that kind of junk.
That is because these stories specifically lump all "people of color" together, as if this country--not to mention the world--is in a constant struggle between "white" people and "people of color" for POWER. That is the racist way in which leftists, and Scientific American, look at the world. . They look at the world as a constant struggle between "epople of color" and "white" people. They assert, as did this Scientific American article, that "white" people becoming a minority in this country will TRANSFROM the country. Bunk Junk. Racism. Idiocy. I have not even LOOKED a a Sceintific American magazine since. It is just as RACIST a magazine as the Ku Klux Klan, and just as racist as Sonial Sotomayor.
Almost the least of the idiocy and racism is the idea that we can DEFINE discrete "races" in this country. "Latinas" (note to Sonial Sotomayor) are WHITE--albeit they may also have a mixture of Native American "blood". It is RIDICULOUS to talk about the percentage of "white" people in this country, when MOST people in this country are of MIXED race (to one degree or another). Factually, that is true of almost ALL "latinas" and "latinos".
And how racist is it to assume that all "people of color" think the SAME, and consider "white" people their ENEMIES and OPPRESSORS from whom it is necessary to claim poer? You can't get any more racist than that. I repeat as a fact: SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN IS A RACIST MAGAZINE.
I am not done (no groans, please). WHY should this country be "transfromed" if "white" people become a "minority"? Are the people who claim this really saying that Hisapnic Americans and black Americans shoudl not share the principles that made this country the greatest country in the world? Should not adopt those principles as AMERICNAS, as the Ilatians, Poles, Greeks, and other Americans did after immigrating to this country?
Yep. You should see where I am going here. The fact is thqt Hispanics and African-Americans should be CONSERVATIVES. They should be conservatives not BECAUSE they are black or Hispanic, just like I am not a conservative BECAUSE I am a "white" male. I am not. I am of MIXED race, just like most of them. "Right" and "wrong" do NOT depend on race, and you are a RACIST if you think they do, or--worse--SHOULD.
Yes, I expect that the rising "minority" population, and rising "tolerance", will result in more "multiracial" people being elected to office. So what. President Obama is almost certainly MORE WHITE than he is black. My problem with him is that he is LEFTIST--not that he has some percentage of "black" "blood". There is NO reason for this country to change AT ALL because multiracial people become a "majority", and "white" people a "minority". The only way that is not true is if you egard society as a POWER competition amond and between racial and ethnic groups. If you believe that, you ARE a RACIST. Most leftists do believe that.
Don't I see how "fundamental" the change is when people like Obama and Sonia Sotomayor reach power? Nope. The "fundamental" change is because these people are leftist RACISTS. The fact that more Hipsanics, blacks and mixed race people achieve power, AS INDIVICUALS, should not change anything at all. They still need to govern the best way, and they still need to have the "values" tghat made this country so great.
Yep. It IS "progress" that the opportunity of people is not now significantly restricted because of the color of their skin, except by leftists. It IS a good thing thqat "latinos" and "blacks" can be lected to any political office, and achieve any political office. But to suggest that they should BELIEVE differently on the best course for this country BECAUSE of thieir race is RACIST. It is also a recipe for disaster, as these people are being told by leftists that they SHOULD take REVENGE on "white" people for discrimination by OTHER "white" people.
Don't I realize that blacks and Hispanics are voting in large numbers for leftist Democrats? Yes, I do realize that, and it is a mistake on their part. But to suggest that they should do that BECAUSE of their race/ethnic origin is RACIST. To the extent they are doing so because of that, or becuase Democrats are promising that the government will be their only salvation, that is the wrong reason for such a vote. If they really believe in the leftist message, fine. But that message has to stand on its merits, and leftist Democrats shoud NOT be able to get votes by encouraging a war for "power" between "while" people and "people of color". That kind of thing will merely destory this country, as so many leftist polices are destroyingn this country.
As this blog has shown, leftist Democrats--and complicit Republicans--ARE destroying this country, This absurd racism is merely one example of how they are doing so.