Since 2008 (the campaign), this blog has been calling President Obama a LIAR as to his stated position that marriage should only be between one man and one woman (at a time). You should know by now that this blog is NEVER wrong, and that this blog is famous for FORESIGHT (rather than hindsight).
Well, today the Obama Administration--continuing its "focus" on JOBS that has continued from the beginning of the Administration (lol)--has decided that the "Defense Of Marriage Act" is unconstitutionial. What this means is that the Obama Administration is going to CONSPIRE with POLITCAL Federal judges to FORCE homosexual marriage on this entire country. This is EXACTLY what this blog told you was the plan in articles written since 2008. Noppe. As this blog has also informed you, leftist Democrats do NOT believe in democracym, or in "the law". What they believe in is FORCE, and that the end justifies the means. Look at the state senators in Wisconsin. In case you did not know, by the way, the Defense Of Marriage Act does NOT force states to prohibit homosexual marriage. It only says that Texas (or any other state) does not have to recognize homosexual marriages from a different state with different values (like Massachusetts).
Yes, President Obama is a sociopathic liar. You will remember that he passionately campaigned (against Hillary Clinton) on the concept that Americans should not be FORCED to buy health insurance. But he purported to "change his mind". He has said he is "reevaluating" his opinion on homosexual marriage. HOGWASH. The guy never meant these things in the first place, and he has always intended for the Federal courts to bail him out on homosexual marriage. President Obama constantly says outrageously false things, and contstantly is contradicdting what he said yesteerday with what he says today--sometimes contradicting himself within the same speech, as he did with his speech in Cleveland about "making sure" that the Federal Government "lives within its means, just like you do". See the article earlier this week, wherein I correctly stated that this is an Orewllian Big Lie that no sane person could accept. That is the sign of a sociopatic liar, who has no conscience at all about lying. Yes, Bill Clinton lied (a little bit of a sociopath himself). And mot politicians hae only a nodding acquaintance with the truth. But Obama is the worst we have ever seen.
Yes. The evluation is complete. President Obama is the worst liar we have ever had in the White House--the most blatant. Sure, there have been a number of Presidents who have been more personally dishonest and corrupt. But as far as blatant lies--saying what you know not to be true, without even caring whether what you say is true or not, Obama has no peer. He stands alone.
Yes, the hypocrites in the mainstream media will criticize Republicans for ignoring "the law", and for taking their eye off of the "improtant" issues i this country (for example, in criticizing the Republicans on the correct atttemot to stop the evil Planned Parenthod from getting taxpayer money in violation of the very core principles of at least half of the country), but they have no problem with leftist Democrats trying to FORCE this kind of thing down people's throats. As this blog has repeatedly stated, of course, the mainstream media are the worst hypocrites--along with other leftist Democrats and just plain leftists--who have ever walked the Earth, on two legs or 4. And talk about DIVISIVE.
Why is Obama picking this fight NOW--refusing to even defend a Federal law in the courts in violation of oath and precedent? Yes, this brings discredit on both Obama AND the Federal judges who conspire with the Obama Administration to take away a law passed as part of our democdratic process (signed by President Clinton). This is what DICTQATORS do (referring to both Obama and the Federal judges conspiring to frustrate democracy). It is the same thing that Democrats in CALIFORNIA have tried to do as ssto the people's VOTE on homosexual marriage in California (see my previous article at the time about how California officials tried to conspire with ONE single judge to frustrate the vote of the people).
This is really terrible stuff, where leftist Democrats are trying to FORCE (ram down our throats) a policy which conflicts with ALL of human history before the 21st Century--history which DOES include INCES and POLYGAM, but which does NOT include homosexual marriage (even when homosexual conduct was widely accepted, as in ancient Greece and in the Roman Empire) To undo all of hunman history by DICTATORIAL FIAT is a truly taerrible thing--indicting these people as people who do not believe in democracy AT ALL. IF we are going to do this, we should do it by the democratic process, and not by MAKNIG UP a "right" that has never existed, and does not exist.
Yes, this elxposes how WRONG John McCain was to prevent a Constituitonal Amendement passing as to defining marriage between a man and a woman. Ype. That is another case of this blog's FORESIGHT. This blog told you that McCain was being deliberately obtuse and dishonest when he failed to recognirze that such an Amendment was needed for this very reason--to keep this from being FORCED upon us exactly as Obama, leftist judges, and leftist Democrats are attempting to do. McCain and EXTABLISHMENT Republicans have a lot to answer for, and Hell will freee over--if it exists--before I will ever again support a true estabishment Republican for any office. You will rememger that I did NOT support the terrible, and terribley stupid o-even stupid in his opportunism--John McCain against Barack Obama. Repubican politicians assured us that the "Defense of Marriage Act" meant that homosexual marriage would NOT be forced down the throats of states which refused to acept homosexual lmarriage. IN FORESIGHT (as usual), this blog told you they were wrong, and told you exactly WHY they were wrong--predicting the very thing that is happening.
Message to the REPUBICAN PARTY AND JOHN MCCAIN (and every Repubican like him): Don't bother to ask for my support or money. As I have stated repeatedly, I am not a Repubican. Yes, I will support SOME Repubicans, and a LOT of supposedly "Republican" issues, but there is no way I will ever support the present Repubican establishment. Don't ask. You will NEVER getr my support, and not truly estabishment Republican will ever get my support for ANY office (except, perhaps, as a momentary tactical move becasue the Republican Party looks like it is forced into a corner where the establishment Repubicans are politically forced to be on the side of conservatives who they privately class as "hicks" and Neanderthals).
As stated above, there is MUCH more history of POLYGAMY and INCEST in history than there is of homosexual marriage. Turst me on this one: There is NO BASIS to say that people cannot engage in polygamy, if you say that people have a right to homosexual marriage. Indeed, Anderson Cooper--sanctimonious hypocrite that he is--is looking at horror tonight on the polygamist, Warren Jett, without even seeming to have a clue that the issue is the SAME as to polygamy and homosexual marriage. We may be seeing the death of marriage in this country. Will Texas be forced to recognize polygamy, or a marriage between brother and sister, if ANY other state does so? If Obama is correct, as he is not, that is the result. Unless, of course, you are the worst hypocrites who have ever walked the Earth, on two legs or four--or a sociopathic liar, like Obama. In that event, you don't care, or even recognize, whether your positiions are logically consistent.
Do ou realize that we BLACKMAILED Utah into abandoning polygamy in order to get admittted as a state. Sorry, Utah. Obama has determined your "rights" were violated.
P.S. Yes, I recognirze that the Warren Jett case is complicated because of what amounts to pedophilia (a "sexual orientation" that we discriminate against) and statutory rape (in which Planned Parenthood is willing to conspire, and Hollywood is willing to condone in the case of Roman Polanski). That dark underside of Warren Jett's type of polygamy goes beyond the kind of polygamy referenced above. But who knows what unintended consequences will result from this insantiiy of discarding many THOUSANDS of years of human history.
P.P.S. Note, as usual, that the above has been neither proofread nor spell checked, due to my bad eyesight.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment