Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Gloria Borger: Dishonest Political Hack; Jessica Yellen, Dishonest Political Hack (CNN, The Liar Network)

I call Wolf Blitzer (anothr dishonest political hack), Gloria Borger and Jessica Yellen the "unholy trio" of CNN--specializing in partisan political propaganda (leftist propaganda, although if you did not know what "side" they are on, tere is nothing I can do to help you--brain damaged as you are). Yep, I saw a few minutes of propaganda from the unhonly trio yesterday in my surfig of CNN.


We are back to the "birther issue"--sort of--but from a different side that again shows the DISHONESTY and sheer partisanship of CNN (especially the truly terrible Gloria Borger, although we are talking about people--CNN--so uniformly terrible that Gloria Borger is hardly wore than the others, except in sheer, obvioius stupidity). Wolf Blitzer asked Borger and Yellen (sp.? Who could possibly care?) what they thought the POLITICAL effect of Donald Trump's attack on Obama's birth certificate --especially on the chances of Republicans running against Barack Obama.


The first thing you need to realize here is that it is the MAINSTREAM MEDIA--not Donald Trump--that has previously been OBSESSED with USING the "birther issue" AGAINST REPUBLICANS. What that means is that every Repubican--that CNN or the mainstream media gets a chance at--is asked to certify that people who believe that Obama was not born in the United States are evil racists condemned by the Republican being asked the question. Repulican politicians are repeatedly asked what they are doing to stop this evil--as if Republicans have a responsibility to convince everyone that Obama was born here---even though it is OBAMA who has control of the only conclusive (maybe) evidence of his brith--his long-form birth certificate. But the mainstream media is unwilling to make it OBAMA'S reponsibility to present the facts of his birth--preferring, for totally political reasons, to suggest that Repubicans have the responsibility to do this (even though they have no reason to know anything about it, other than whether they plan to make an issue of it).


Yes, CNN and the mainstream media are the wort hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. Did CNN, or the rest of the mainstream media, routinely ask Democrats what they were doing to convince Democrats that President Bush was not complicit in 9/11--when at least 35% of Democrats told pollsters they thought he was complicit in 9/11? Don't be silly. CNN is a PROPAGANDA operatioin--not a "news" organization or neutral assassin. You never hear CNN people ask a Democrat whether they agree with Michale Moore, or are willing to condemn him. Rosi O'Donnell? Nope. No questions to Democrats on that sort of thing. Do you arrpove of Planned Parfenthood's apparent complicity in statutory rape, and refusal to follow the law? No Democrat is asked this questioin (the "issue" never even mentioned). Did we go to war in Iraq for HALIBURTON (Dick Cheney's former company)? Not only were Democrat politicians not asked about this vicious LIE, but most Democrats and mainstream media people probably believe it. The same thing happens with regard to that recurrent rumor that Obama is a Muslim, where Repubican politicians are routinely asked to CERTIFY that Obama is a Christian. (How would they know? See below.). With that intorduction to the propaganda of CNN and the mainstream media, let us get back to Wolf Blitzer and Gloria Borger.


What did Gloria Borger say when she was asked how Trump's raising of the "birther issue" would affect Repubicans? Well, she said she thought it would make it more difficult for Repubicans, because they were already hard put to evade attacking "their base" when asked about the "issue" (in the way I describe above). Borger--I can't make this stuff up--said: Repubicans tend to evade by saying that they take Obama at his word, without being direct." The idea, of course, is that "independents can be turned against Republicans on this "issue", which is why it is the mainstream media that was obsessed before Trump.


But look at what Borger said--dishoest political hack that she is. Not only did she try to suggest the "party line" that Repubicans had a REPONSIBILITY to directly condemn potential voters when invited to do so by CNN, but she did so STUPIDLY. Yes, she mixed up the two "issues" that CNN likes to ask Repubican politicians about. That is because Borger is a STUPID political hack.


Do Republicans really say that they take Obama "at his word" that Obama was born in this country? Not except for the very stupid ones, if there are ANY as stupid as Gloria Borger (really doubtful). What does Obama's WORD have to do with whether he was born in the United States? How does he know (except maybe by looking at his long from birth certificate that he won't let anyone else see)? Obama was a new born BABY. He was not even necessarily told if there had been a sneaky, successful attempt to smuggle him into the country ass a newborn baby and to estabish him as born in Hawaii. That is why this is not nearly so bad as the assertions that Bush was involved in 9/11, or even that Cheney went to war for Haliburton. OBAMA was not reponsible for his birth--although he may or may not have known of any "conspiracy" to alter his place of birth (IF such a thing happened). That is merely a question of FACT--not a vicious slur on Obama's characcter. Bush and Cheney, on the other hand, are accused of KILLING AMERICANS for their own selfish purposes--a crime beyond imagination. It is entirely possible--if really unlikely--that a family might fudge to have a child recognized as born in the United States (something like it happens regularly here along the Mexican border). It is IMPOSSIBLE to believe that even Bush and Cheney (the "even" is for the benefit of those who hate them) would kill Americans for their own selfish ends.


Q.E.D. Borger is a stupid political hack. Yes, Repubicans DO say: "I take the President at his word." But they don't do that with regard to the birth certificate (unless, again, they are stupid). They say that with regard to whether Obama is a CHRISTIAN (a question the anti-Christian mainstream media asks Repubicans solely to BOSTER Obama). Many peopole--including me--do not believe Obama is a Christian. Many--not including me--even bellieve he is a Muslim. Ask yourself how a REPUBLICAN politician (or any other person) KNOWS whether Obama is a Christian or not? On this kind of thing, which involves looking into the heart of another person, there is no way to know whether Obama is a Christian except to take him at his word (or not). The CNN/mainstream media idea that Repubicans have a duty to convince people that Obama is a Christian is simply absurd.


See. Gloria Borger can't even keep her propaganda straight. She is one terrible "journalist", and CNN truly is The Liar Network.


Bill Maher and I agree, by the way, that PRESIDENTA OBAMA IS NOT A CHRISTIAN. Leftist ideology is his only religion. I would feel better if he were a Muslim, instead of just anti-Christian (anti may types of Christians, anyway). It was Obama who left the words "by their Creator" out of the Declaration of Independence when he misquted it. It is Obama who denied, in Turiey, that the United States is a "Christian nation". It is Obama who said small town Americans "cling to their guns and their relition" in a bitter, frustrated way.


Want more. Remember Easter? Sunday. Well, Obama did NOT evidently issue a Presidential proclamation recognizing Easter, even though he has done so on MULTIPLE Muslim holidays.


Should a person's religion, or lack of same, be an issue in a political campaign? Of course not, although it has hapened as early as Thomas Jefferson. But it truly is irrelevant. But the mainstream media, and the LEFT, are the ones who insist on making religiion an issue. I have repeatedly shown what the left, including the EVIL Associated Press, has tried to do to Mitt Romeny because he is a Mormon. You will remember what CNN and the rest of the mainstream media tried to do over Sarah Palin having gone to a Pentecostal chruch ("speaking in tongues") IN THE PAST. You know how CNN tused atheist Bill Maher to continuously attack Christine O'Donnell. Nope. I do NOT "turn the other cheek" (being an agnostic, and not a Christian).

Therefore, from now until November of 2012, this blog will continuously certify that President Obama is NOT a Christian, as Bill Maher and I agree. Note that Maher was used continuously to basically attack Christine O'Donnell on her religion (and many other things), but that CNN is NOT so anxious to cite Bill Maher on Barack Obama as a "secular humanist".


Yes, Gloria Borger, I want you to TALK about whether DEMOCRATS should be asked what they think of Bill Maher saing that Obama is not a Christian. Oh, I forgot. You are a political hack and a hypocrite.


Jessica Yellen? I bet you thought I would not get to her. Wrong, bioson breath (Johnny Carson/Karnak reference). Yellen chimed in to say that what concerned HER was that OTHER Repubicans were getting a "free ride" to "hone" their message while CNN and the rest are concentrating on Donald Trump. I kid you not. She said that. Can you state more directly that you are interested in POLITICAL PROPAGANDA against Republicans? No, you can't, and Jessica Yellen is a dishonest political hack. She obviusly wants CNN to be out there looking at every word Mitt Romeny, et. al. say to PICK THOSE WORDS APART. CNN excuses every thing Obama says, but let a Repubican say something even arguably wrong (whether because he is tired or whatever), and the mainstream media will ATTACK--blowing it all out of proportion. Jessica Yellen admitted that is what she wants to do. And it is a shameful thing, except she and CNN have no shame. She is right, by the way, that Donald Trump is taking all of the fire now, and that is GOOD for other Republicans (so long as Trump does not come to represent the Republican Party). For Repubicans, the less opportunity the mainstream media has to concentrate their PROPAGANDSA on those Repubilcans, the better off they are-unless they have no name recognitioin, and perhaps even then. The Presidential race is TOO LONG anyway, and there is no downside to a late start, except that you have to raise money and establish yourself as a serious candidate FOR THE NOMINATION. Running against Obama is best seriously done later. However, Trump has shown the way that ATTACKING Obama is something Repubicans need to do as early as possible--despite that media backlash that can be expected.


Jessica Yellen did a "budget battle" story--a partisan political hatchet job--on how Reublicans were looking at "only" 12% of the budget in that "shut donwn the government" battle over spending. She asserted that most of the public did not "understand" that. Yes, she has CONTEMPT for YOU, but I have much more contempt for HER--dishonest political hack that she is.


I have seen Gloria Borger--correctly--attacked elsewhere for deliberately using the image of Obama as the "adult in the romm" as propaganda. These are all political hacks, and I am hoping more people will start atttacking them BY NAME. I do, and with examples of exactly what they are doing. No, I watch CNN no more than 10 minutes a day, and often less. It is enough. If I watched regularly, I would not have time to use all of the material anyway. The CNN Big Liews are repeated over and over
again.


P.S. No proofreading or spell checking (eyesight).

No comments: