Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Sarah Palin: Associated Press and Sara Kugler Are Despicable People

Yes, here is today's AP/AOL "featured" AOL story from the "Anti-Aermican, Despicable Associated Press" (always use official, complete name in first reference):

"Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who has not held a press conference in nearly four weeks of campaigning, on Tuesday barred most pool reporters from her meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, the first foreign head of state she has ever met."

That story (above is lead) was written by the despicable Sara Kugler, and is typical of the AP and the mainstream media.  ".....first foreign leader she has ever met" indeed.  The despicable AP is not interested in Palin meeting a foreign leader.  It, and the mainstream medai, are only interested in trying to destroy Sarah Palin.  See the multiple archive entries in this blog.

Read the above paragraph carefullly.  Consider carefully whether you ever saw such gratuitous slams at the experience of Obama by the despicable AP or the mainstream media. 

Now consider whether a sane person would subject hereself to "questioning" by people trying to destroy her.  I will be disappointed if Sarah Palin holds a "news" conference before the election.with these reporters tryting to destroy her.  These reporters are not interested in information.  They are interested in "personal destruction."  You would have to be much dumber than I am convinced Sarah Palin is to let these people conduct a "feeding frenzy" "press" conference.  Nor should Palin give the time of day to the evil people (see archives as to why I use "evil") NBC, or MSNBC.  It would be crazy. 

The mainstream medai has shown their incredible bias against Palin--a desire to destroy that goes beyond bias.  These people are "all in" to destroy Sarah Palin.   They have made their bed. Let them lie in it.  Sarah Palin and John McCain have no obligation to help their declared enemies in their campaign of destruction. 

The despicable AP, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, and the rest should hold a press conference to explain why they have become the primary agents of the :"politics of personal destruction" in this country--acting as surrogates for Obama.

A snowball would have to exist unmelted in Hell for the next ten years before I would give these people (AP and the rest of the mainstream media) the time of day.

'AP:  Bite me!!!!!  There, I said it so Sarah Palin does not have to.  She can talk to foreign leaders, and campaign on the issues, unmolested lby these evil gnats. 

When was Obama's last press conference?  It appears to have been a year ago,  and then he took few questons and complained about those. And Obama can, and does, expect favorable treatment that Sarah Palin will never get.  Why take "questions" from people consumed by hatred trying to stoke hatred against you (referring to Palin)?  The man who is the beneficiary of all of this "journalist" hatred against Palin, and can expect favorable treatment, does not want to expose himself to press "gotcha" question (referring to Obama).  This AP article (and the evil CNN (the liar network) led the boycott against video coverage of Palin's meeting) is merely part of the continuing smear campaign to destroy Sarah Palin.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Obama's last press conference, you ask? I just googled it.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/09/barack_obama_sept_23_press_con.html

23 September 2008. He took questions from reporters.

just sayin'

Anonymous said...

More Obama press conferences. - Truly, I am just telling you what Google is telling me. It's almost funny.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NBv88rG608
4 September 2008 after his interview with bill O'Reilly

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/07/obama_press_conference_in_jord.html
22 July 2008 in Jordan


http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/29/transcript-obama-press-conference-on-jeremiah-wright/
29 april 2008, less than a year ago.

Anonymous said...

Biden (direct comparison with Palin) has done NO general press conference since being named CP nominee, just like Palin (for the same reasn, really, which is that it would take away the focus of the campaign).  This comes from CNN.  If you regard that as a questionable source, be my guest.  Now I got my information on Obama from a media source.   However, I ask you:  Do you REMEMBER an Obama general press conference, where he took general QUESTIONS?  Would you not have heard about it?  I think so.  This is a matter, I think, of SEMANTICS.  There are "press conferences" where you call the press to hear you, but you do not take questions.  Then there are general press conferences, where you take general lquestions.  As far as I am award, Obama has NOT held a question and answer press conference, where he takes a substantial number of questions, in a long time.  I am not interested enough to go through th eprovided links.  It would be a waste of my time.  I think I would have heard about it.  I could be wrong.  If so, it is still immaterial to the points of the entry.  Note that if Obama did hold a question and answer session, he could pretty much count on media help (like he got from George Stephanopolous).  Palin would be like the Christians facing the lions.