Race and Obama: CNN Plays the Race Card

CNN, the "liar" network, has tried to destroy Sarah Palin as a surrogate for Barack "World" Obama.  See entries over the past three weeks, including the award to CNN of the coveted/dreaded Flying, Fickle Finger of Fate on two consecutive weekends.  CNN is desinitely in contention for a "threepeat". 

CNN has failed Obama.  They have failed to destory Sarah Palin, probably destroying themselves in the process.  There are indications that Obama surrogates--made desperate by the polls seeming to show that Obama is not ahead, even though Obama "like Jesus", while McCain is a tired old man--are playing the race card. The best evidence is this from CNN's Jack Cafferty (about as biased and stupid as MSNBC's Keith Olbermann, although no one is quite in that league):

"Race is arguably the biggest issue in this election, and it's one that nobody's talking about."

Note the "clever" mainstream media speak.  "Arguably", when the intent is to assert it as a fact.   Even so, the assumption is that race is AN ISSUE.  The only question, for CNN, is whether it is the BIGGEST issue (no doubt where they stand).  So much for the economy (problem with the "economy" as an issue is that it is unclear that eithr cnadidate can do antyhing abuot the economy except harm it further).

What is the point of 'playing the race card". You know it as well as I do.  The point is to get people to vote for obama BECAUSE OF HIS RACE.  The idea is to intimidate people into voting for Obama lest they be lumped with thos REACIST HICKS who are gainst Obama because he is black.  Obama used this despicable tactic, through surrogates, against Hillary Clinton, and there are indications he is doing it now against McCain.

Why would anyone vote against Obama, who was a commuiity orgainzer like Jesus?  Gee.  I don't know.  The man does know how to read a telepromter, to the extent that he is now bringing a teleprompter to help him at town hall meetings. But what has he DONE in his life.  He reads a good speech, but what has he ACCOMPLISHED.  He talks a good game, on occasion when he is not floungering without a teleprompter, but he has NO SUBTSTANTIAL EXPRERIENCE.  The mainstream media is attacking Sarah Palin for not having enough experience to be VICE PRESIDENT, when it is an open question as to whether she is even, slightly below, or slightly above Obama in real, useful experience.  Thre is no doubt she has more accomplishments. 

Then there is that little item that Obama is the most leftist candidate, supportted by the most far left kooks, ever to run for President--certainly since Goerge McGovern.  Obama is MATCHING McGovren by promising to give everyone, except the rich, $1000.00 (actually per couple, which means he might not quite match McGovern in attempted BRIBERY). 

Now McGovern lost with 40% of the vote against Nixon's 60%.  Is it racist and sexist that McCain is not getting that many votes against a candidate just as hopelessly far left, if not more far left, than McGovern?

You have an extreme left candidate who does not compare with his opponent in experience in perilous times.  My question is not why McCain is even in the polls, but why he is not way ahead.

You racist hicks out there who may even be THINKING of voting against Obama:  Aren't you ashamed.  CNN wants you to be ahsamed.  CNN does regard you as racist hicks who do not see things as clearly as the elitists at CNN.  They look down on you.

Message to CNN (all of them) and Jack Cafferty:  I look WAY down on you.