I have previously established in this blog that leftists do not believe in democracy (death penalty, abortion, and many other examples). I have established that leftists do not really believe in free speech ("Fairness Dcotrine" aimed at talk radio, shouting down/prohibiting conservative speakers at universities, and many other examples noted in blog archives). Now I can state definitively that leftists do not believe in privacy--"privacy" in the correct, traditional meaning instead of being used as a deceptive substitute for "pro-abortion".
Sarah Palin's private email account at Yahoo was hacked by leftists. What was the main interest on the left? Right. If it had been Obama the main interest would have been on Republican "dirty tricks", and on demanding a full investigation and punishment. With Palin, what the left was interested in was NOT how her privacy had been invaded, and even her children's privacy--to the extent of pictures and cell phone numbers. Nope. We are talking about the EVILI left here: the people with no standards and not morality except POWER.
For the evil left, this was merely an opportunity for a way to attack Palin, even if they had to manufacture it. PRIVACY? We don't believe in no stinkin' privacy with regard to conservatives, just like we don't believe in no stinkin' free speech for conservatives. I heard one leftist commentator dismiss the hacking (a federal CRIME, and the website revealing the illegally obtained information may well have committed crimes as well)--dismissed the hacking with: "Privacy? Welcome to the Washington big leagues Sarah. You have no privacy running for this high an office." Uh-huh. And you, sir, have NO morality, in the old fashioned sense of that word. This is typical of the leftist/FEMINIST attitude toward Sarah Palin, which is that it does not matter what it takes to destroy her. This is also the attitude of CNN and the rest of the mainstream media. The goal here is to DESTROY Sarah Palin, and the end justifies the means.
This brings me to the point. Message to leftists out there whose interest in the story of the hacked emails is to MANUFACTURE smears against Sarah Palin: You are EVIL people. You are some of the most EVIL people who have ever existed in American politics. I lieved through the era of Richard Nixon (whose leftist enemies were as bad as he was, but LESS bad than leftists have become today). Nixon was not this bad, and he was pretty bad. For example, I can flatly state that CCN, and the rest of the mainstream media, have been WORSE than Nixon ever thought of being in this election. That is before you even get to the openly leftist partisans, like the leftist blogs, Keith Olbermann, and Rachel Maddow (evil people all--I name names).
That brings me to Gloria Allred, EVIL PERSON. She is merely a representative stand in for the rest of the evil left, and Politico.com came dangerously close to joining the leftist dark side on this one. Politico.com bothers me. I think they are way too ready to join the leftist smear bandwagon at the weakest excuse, as on this occasion. I digress (not really). This all came from Greta Van Susteren's show last night. Back to Gloria Allred.
What was the leftist propaganda line last night? Unless you are a leftist, or heard a leftist trot this stupidity out, you will never guess in a million years. I will pause for a few seconds while you try............ The leftist party line last night, INCLUDING Politico.com, was that Palin's private email account raised the "question" of whether Sarah Palin had used her private email account for state business.
You have to think like an evil leftist to make sense of this. Let me back up a little. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson of Texas, where I live, was INDICTED for allegedly using her state owned computers and assets from private campaign business. Although this was a political stunt, Hutchinson was under the cloud of an indictment for some time. You will notice she is still a Senator from Texas, and was even mentioned as a possible VP (it being obvious that had she been chosen, that old indictment would have been part of the leftist attempt to DESTROY her, as if she had killed a woman by driving her off of a bridge and abandoning her under the water to die--oops! I am not supposed to mention Ted Kennedy now that he is ailing). The point is that an office holder has to be careful not to use state property for purely private business. If you were an office holder, you would want to bend over backwards to avoid it.
Enter the truly EVIL leftist hacks like Gloria Allred. Last night Allred came close to demanding a subpoena of Sarah Palin's entire private email account for the past two years. Why? It is out of the book "Catch 22". If you use your state computer for private business, it may be a crime, and at the very least the left will attack you. If you "use" your private email account for "state business" (this is often a gray area, and if it is a grey area you should use the private account: Ask Kay Bailey Hutchinson!!!), leftists will accuse you of "hiding" things because they cannot use "freedom fo information" requests to FISH in ALL of your emails for things to smear you with. I am serious. This is exactly what leftists are doing.
You may ask: Don't leftists worry about THEIR privacy being invaded, and being subject to this unfair dilemma themselves. NOPE. Because leftists count on their control of the mainstream media, and that the media will be helping leftists and not worried about fishing expeditions to hurt them. Plius, leftists have an automatic forum for their ridiculous charges, while they can count on the mainstream media calling them ridiculous the other way around. Back to the evil and intellectually dishonest Gloria Allred (I would be GLAD to hear from anyone disputing this characterization, but be warned I will be happy to expand upon my reasons for so labeling her).
Could Gloria Allred say that Sarah Palin was "conducting" state business in these emails? Nope. None of the ILLEGALLY hacked emails had any obvious "conducting" of sate business. The closest was an email with the lieutenant governor of Alaska about disgraceful media attacks. Would it have mattered if Palin had mentioned something like: "While I am talking to you about this personal stufff, I want to remind you to check on that legislation we are so concerned about." Would that sort of ambiguous "conducting' of state business have been significant. NO. Unless you are an evil leftist. It would not have meant a single, solitray thing. But there was not even anything like that.
Did that stop Gloria Allred. NO. She went on and on about how we "Might" discover such "conducting" of state business if more emails come out (as I said, virtually demanding a subpoena, as if merely having a private email account was grounds for suspicion). . Gloria Allred was MAKING THIS STUFF UP. She was trying to SPECUALTE without evidence on something that would not be bad in the first place. Allred actually had the nerve to say that a "complete record" of state business was necessary for archiving purposes. HOGWASH. This is the weakest excuse for EVIL I have ever heard. So Gloria Allred thinks it is all right to SPECULATE on wrongful conduct with no evidence, then the non-existent wrongful conduct being speculated about is only--at best--a technical mistake in the first place.
Note the enormous stretch here to try to attack Sarah Palin, who was the VICTIM here. First, you have to speculate that she used her private email account for something that MIGHT be considered state business. If she did slip inadvertently on that, it would still not be really "wrong". It might be like going one mph over the speed limit. To make it actually wrong (remember, a public official has to lean over backwards to avoid using prublic computers for private business), there would have to be a deliberate attempt to use the private email account to cover up wrogdoing--for which there is NO evidence, or even basis for speculation.
Q.E.D. Gloria Allred, and leftists who think like her, are EVIL people. They will give lip service to "outrage" over the hacking of Sarah Palin's email. But they don't mean it. They are willing to USE the illegally hacked emails for..........what? Something so important that it can't be ignored? .........Have you stopped laughing yet? Nope. Gloria Allred is willing to attempt to USE the illegally hacked emails to SPECULATE that Sarah Palin might have technically violated what GLORIA ALLRED regards as good government practice. And where does this whole ridiculous house of cards come from? It comes from Karl Rove and Republican campaign people who were also White House staffers having private email accounts in the campaign, as they legally had to have separate from their official computers, and using those email accounts to discuss official matters (which paranoid, or simply partisan, Democrats "suspect" might have included material on the firing of those U.S. attorneys). This entirely explains this attempt by Goria Allred and other evil leftists to try to bootstrap into the same arugment on Sarah Palin, without any real excuse. Leftists thought they go somewhere on Karl Rove and the White House with this "argument". (I, personally, doubt that anyone cared, outside of leftist circles).
Bottom line. Leftists are willing to use ILLEGALLY obtained emails to MAKE UP rumors and gossip against Sarah Palin. This is just a small part of the EVIL smear campaign against Sarah Palin, but it is a revealing part.
This incident glaringly reveals that evil leftists like Gloria Allred really do believe that the end justifies the means. They do no care about privacy, fairness, or logic. They are out to DESTROY Sarah Palin.
And they then will claim that they are upset that the "issues" are not being discussed!!!! CNN will sanctimoniously echo them. The SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITES. These are evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil people.
No comments:
Post a Comment