Barack Obama Is Not a Christian: Where Are the Tv Experts?

I am stil waiting for President Barack Obama to be asked this qquestion: "A strong supporter of yours, Bill Maher, has said that you are NOT a Christian, but are a secular humanist. What is your reaction to that? Do you repudiate what Bill Maher has said?"


It is Barack Obama who TWICE "edited" the Declaration of Independence to delet "by their Creator" from the text. It is Barack Obama who made the famous quote about small town Americans "clinging to ttheir guns and their religion, taking out their frustrations on people different from them." It is Barack Obama who has shown NO evidence tghaqt he really is a BELLIEVER in any religion, as distinguished from a person who professes a religion for persoanl convenience and gain. As professed agnostics, both Bill Maher and I KNOW: Barack Obama is NOT a believing Christian. What's more, I don't believe that many people think he is. Yes, that makes Barack Obama a liar and a hypocrite, but you already knew that. This is the man who progesses to "personaly" oppose gay marrriage, while EVERYONE knows that is a LIE (Obama wanting the Federal courts to do what he does not have the COURAGE to advocate).


Yes, this "issue" was raised before,. Where were, and are, the "experts" in the evangelical Christian movvement talking aobut how Barack Obama has shonw no indication of being a believing Christian? The BIGOTED media--truly evil people--have SEARCHED out "exeperts" to talk about ow Mormonism is a "cult". Have they seached out "experts" to talk about Obama's relligion, or lack of seam, and the DETAILS of what Obama believes? Don't be silly. These are the worst, most dishonest hhypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. They are not interested in religion, per se, since they aer anti-Christian bigots one and all. No, what they are interested in is AGENDA, and the agenda here is to entangele Republicans in a BOTOGTED discussion on religion prompted by the BIGOTS of the media, witht he idea that this will turn most voters off. It is the MEDIA who are pushing this idea of religon as an important "issue" in the Repubican nomination fight--not the candidates. No, I am not naive. Rick Perry may well like the idea of Mitt Romney's Mormonism coming under discussioin. But Perry is NOT out there PUSHING that idea. That is entirely the responsibility of the BIGOTS of the mmedia (Chis Wallace, CNN, et. al.). I have LESS respect for "journalists" every single day of my ife, and I have had hardly any respect for them for some 40 years (I am notw 64). Message to Chris Wallace and the unfair and unbalanced network: I specifically have less respect for YOU every single day, which is why I now recommend BOYCOTTING the unfair and unbalanced network.


What I do;on't understand about Republicans is why they LET the media get away with painting ONLY Republicans into a "religious" corner, by continually asking them unfair and irrelevant religious questions. When are REPUBLICANS going to start CAlLING OUT the media, and telling them that they are pushing relgious bigotry and an EVIL concentration on religious doctrine as part of our national elections? When are Republicans going to take the example of Newt Gingrich, and start ATTACKING the QUESTIONS for the evil things that they are? Ye, Rick Santorum should have wALKED OUT on Chris Wallace, as Christine O'Donnell properly did on the despicable Piers Morgan (question to Santroum, hwho should have walked out there as well: "Do you believe that homosexuality is a sin").


Nope. That is why Republicans have been disappointing. They have been more intereseted in attacking EACH OTHER than in really standing up for both conservatism and plain decency.


When is a REPPUBICAN gong to say: "Why don't you ask Barack Obama that questioin. I would be interested in knowing the answer. In fact, I would be interestred in kowing what religion President Obama really believes in." You whow why you will ot see a REPUBICANN candidate say that. They are COWARSS, and not willing to stand up to the falp--even by saying whhat this blog has been saying: Either you examing ALL candidates on their theological beliefs, and mayybe administer a lie detector, or you treat teh detaisl of a candidate's religion as NOT DEBATABLE in a sane POLITICAL contest. But whether they attack the questions my way or not, Repubicans HVVE to start attackng the qestions, and STANDING UP later for the attack.


The debatge tonight is supposed to be ONLY about the economy. But we KINOW "journalists" are DISHONESTG We shal lsee, and we shall see if any Republicans--even Michele Bachmann--can grow any balls (besides Newt, who has obviously thought he has nothing to lose).