ObamaCare: A Praoven Fraud (Along with Most Republican Politicians)

See my previous articel Note how I ridiculed the idea that "deficit reduction" over ten years (a Soviet 10-yer pllan, when even the old Soviet Union never had the gall to do more than a 5-year plan) can be "offset" against CURRENT ADDITIONS to the deficit and debt. As an aside, you might well want to consider what happens if we have ANOTHER RECESSON, which happens at least once every ten years (on average--assuming we ever get out of the current recession).


Now this oint is obvious, even though REPUBLICANS are perfectly wililing to go with the LIE. However, it was proven again this Monday. Remember the "great" 'solution" to long-term care which was part of ObamaCare? Well, Health and Human Services (ys, the OBAMA Health and Human Services cabinet department) has REPEALED that part of ObamaCare> You did not know that Obama could simply "repeal" a law without an act of Congress? Neither did I. Nixon was revented from "impounding" money, and simply not spending it. I am a littl bemused by how Obama simply asserts the "right" to follow such "laws' as he wants to follow, and grant "waivers" on the rest (as he has done with illegal immigrants who have not YET committed a serious crime).


That is what is realy funny hre. Obama is OPPOSING a REPEAL of the lnog-term insurance provisions of ObamaCare, even though the Obama Administration is proposing to NOT FOLLOW THE LAW. If ever a person has conclusively shown the defects of his own law and philosophy, Obama has donee so. He has conclusively admitted that HE, along with everyone else, did not have any idea as to whether the provisions of ObamaCare would actually work. And now, when even Obama has to admit that a part of ObamaCare used to SELL it to a resistaing public, is UNWORKABLE< Obama simplyl refues to REPEAL the unworkable law because it might SOMEDAY be FIXED.


This, of course, is Obama's attitude toward ObamaCare itself (Pelosi: We need to pass it to find out what is in it"). Obama did not CARE what was in the ObamaCare bill, and never did care. All he wanted was a bill establishing the PRINCIPLE of a government takeover of health care, with the idea that once we hedad down that road we will never turn back. Indeed, most ouf us "smart people" realize that Obama WANTS ObamaCare to be "unworkable', so that we can turn to a totally government system (see previous article, as Obama also wants that ONE system to replace Medicare, and make certain seniors in this country will not receive adequate medical care).


What about the "ten year plan"? Well, part of the DEFICIT REDUCTGION (a complete fraud) in ObamaCare was 70 BILLIION dollars or so (over ten years) in REVENUE from this long-term care insurance program. It turns out that even the Oama Administration now ADMITS that "deficit reduction" was a FRAUD--a more obvious and false fraud than the Bush "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq).


How much else of ObamaCare is "unworkable", and ready to BANKRUPT this country (as the Obama Administration says this long-term care plan--CLAS--would have done)? Most of us think that it has always been obvious that ObamaCare is a complete fraud, with no chance of "working" as advertised. As stated, Obama and the Democrats did not care. They jsut wanted the beginning of a government takeover of health care, and they are perfectly willing to work out the details later. Can the country SURVIVE while they are "working out lthe details" to fitt their government centered vison? Probably not..


Obama, however, can NEVER give up oon his "signature" legistlation. And the left can NEVER give up on its idea that government can create utopia, instead of making it impossible to have a properly functioning free market economy.


Read the previous aarticle again. And realize WHY I am so down on Repubicans. Despite GIFTS like this usurrender on this major part of ObamaCare, Republicans are still not willing--as a rule--to take on Obama DIRECTLY as to this idea that government d=can directly create jobs. That sis what makes me despair. I always knew ObamaCaer would fail. There was no way it could succeed. But if Republicans are unwilling to really learn the LESSOn that government is not capable of a "10-year plan", then what hope is there for us all> That is what gives me nightmares.


P.S. No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesihgt). These last two articles are two where I wish I still had the eyesight to proofread, or was getting paid to make sure thiese articles are lproperly proofread. But--and I wish leftists and Republican politicians would all learn this--we have to deal with reality as it is, and not as we would wi=sh it to be. I believe that these last two articles are really imporant, because the vents of today have shown that this whole idea of a "10-year plan" is just as BAD as when STALIN and the Soviet Union came up with the idea of a government "5-year plan". And I continue to have CONTGEMPT for Republican politicians who buy into this idea that we can PROMISE everything ten years from now. Yep. I know that means I don't like Paul Ryan's budget, even though I like his apporach to Medicare, and I have already told lyou that I do not like Ryan's approach to "deficit reduction" ten years from now. As I have also told you, I WOULD like Bachmann's approach, except her "approach" seems to be to simply SAY that we need to spend only what we take in without actually PROPSOING any ideas as to how we do that. That is why Herman Cain is dong better than she is. Yo wonder whether he can last, but he has been BOLD, while Bachnamnnn ha beeen a walking, talking "tali=king point" of Tea Party "politics as usual".