Obama, Comic Genius: Is Obama a Muslim? (Chris Matthews, Hypocrite)

This blog has previously noted that President Obama is a comic genius, along with his minions. These people are much funnier than Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert--who are not, of course, that funny. Yesterday provided yet another case in point.

Yes, the mainstream media yesterday rpovided video showing the White House spokesman defending "Muslims". This is is an example of the side splitting humor of Obama: "Americans reject 'guilt by associaton.'" And the humorist hypocrites in the mainstream media were nodding approvingly at this statement--not even seeming to appreciate the humor.

Yes, CNN, MSNBC and the rest again did not seem to realizer that Obama was CONDEMNING them as some of the worst people who ever walked the Earth: the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. And this is not the first time Obama has used satiric humor to TRASH an unsuspecting, clueless mainstream media.

You will remember when Obama said--the acclaimed Obama "healing", "can't we all get along", speech about the Giffords shooting--that it was an evil (translating here, and paraphrasing) for the mainstream media to "blame" people for the Babby Giffords shooting, although comic genius Obama then went on to argue for "civility" on the insane basis that it would make the victims of the Giffords shooting "proud of us". Shwoing that this was merely inspired humor, Obama forgot all about "civility" when unions started these ANGRY portests in Wisconsin, and elsewhere. Leftist Democrats, and the mainstream media (along with that inciter to murder, the Pima Country Sheriff in Arizona), meanwhile, had blamed Sarah Palin and the Tea Prty for the "lack of civility" that they said had "caused" the Giffords shooting. Illustrating how on target Obama's satiric humor is, these people did not even seem to realize that Obama was calling them EVIL in his speeech. Needless to say, the mainstream media has forgotten all about "civility" in reporting on the union protests.
(If you doubt the comic genius of President Obama, consider that the Goffords Memorial speech was made in a UNIVERSITY setting, turning it into an Obama campaign rally--recognized as such by my Obama supporting daughter in Boston--before cheering students.)

"Guilt by association"? Obama says the American people reject it. If they do, then that may explain why they are rejecting the mainstream media with total contempt. Since the Tea Party movement started, that has been the entire approach of CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the mainstream media: Blame th eentire Tea Party for every single "angry" or "racist" sign or shout from the crowd. If ONE Tea Party "leader" turns out to be a racist, then that discredits the whole Tea Party. If ANY "anti-government" loon attacks the government, or a government person, in some way, then that is the resposibility of the entire Tea Party. Under this s"standard", of course, EVERY Muslim is responsible for all of these terrorists attacks by Muslims, including 9/11. But the people of the mainstream media are the most dishonest hypocrites to ever walk the Earth. The comic genius of Obama is/was to recgnize this, and highlight it. Yes, the mainstream media is just a part of the leftist section of the Democratic Party, and I am STILL seeing leftists featured on the mainstream media saying that the entire Tea Party movement is racist becaause of isolated signs and std statements allegedly put forth by ISOLATED Tea Party members--even AFTER WORSE SIGNS AND STATEMENTS BY UNIONS AND THEIR POLITICAL SUPPORTERS IN RECENT WEEKS. Dishonest hypocrites all.

Ah, Chris Matthews and "guilt by associatioin". Yes, MSNBC is a master of the evil of asserting "guilt by association". They will assert that mere support of Repubicans by individuals or groups discredits the entire Republican Party, while dismissing as evil any attempt to attack Obama because Obama was supported by HAMAS (and other terrorists, along with many other bad people not as bad as terrorists). Yes, Obama was and IS supported by GOLDMAN SACHS (as to which Michael Moore and I agree). But all of this is not what I had in mind when I put Chris Matthews in the heading.

I can't make this stuff up. I actually heard this myself, while suring through the "news' channels, even though I see maybe a minute of Chris Matthews a week. It was the time of the Glenn Beck rally in Washington, D.C. Now I have never been able to watch, or listen to, Beck--despite Beck's ability for a time to highlight absurd leftists in the Obama Administration and elsewhere. And Beck has gone further and further off of the deep end as he has gotten more "spiritual" and global minded. But Chris Matthews came up with a uniquely EVIL way--condemned as such by Obama, whor obviously and rightly has contempt for Matthews and MSNBC--of trying to discredti Beck.

Matthews noted that one of the speakers at Beck's rally was a Christian cleric allegedly known for attacks on homosexuals (HORRORS!!!!). No, I don't mean actual attacks. I mean merely the kind of verbal "attacks" on homosexual conduct as a "sin" which have really represented Christian doctrine for almost 2000 years (even as St. Paul and other early Christians--perhaps Jesus Himself--had a pretty dim view of sex with women). But that is not the point. Matthews was saying that mere ASSOCIATION by Beck with aperson who was intolerant of homosexuality discredits Beck. Hypocrite Matthews, of course, thereby discredited HIMSELF.

Has Matthews "associated" with, and approved MUSLIM clerics who condemn homosexual conduct. Of course he has. In fact, I would bet that the Msulims Matthews ha put on his progrtam supporint the infamous New York City mosque pretty mcuh condemn homosexuality. The Muuslim religiion is generally much MORE EXTREME in its condemnation of homosexuality than modern Christian religioins (even fundamentalist Christians, for the most part). You will remember that Ahmadinejad, President of Iran, said: "We HANG homosexuals." That is not unusual in the Muslim world, where homosexual conduct is punishable by DEATH in several places. What does Matthews say abut MUSLIMS who "associate" with such people and doctiren, inclduing, almost certainly, HIMSELF? No, I have never heard Matthews ASK a Muslim guest what his view of homosexual conduct is, because Matthews is UNINTERESTED. Matthews is a partisan hypocrite, and interested only in ageenda. His agenda with Muslims is the leftist agenda of ATTACKING CHRISTIANS AND AMERICANS WHO MATTHEWS WANTS TO ATTACK. Matthews is not interested in whether any particular Muslims, or the Musliim religiion in general, is tolerant in the way Matthews condemns Christians of being intolerant. Tush, Matthews can say that mere ASSOCIATION by Beck with a Christian who condemns homosexual conduct discredits Beck, while association with Muslims who favor the DEATH PENALTY for homosexuals means nothing to Matthews. Matthews is not even interested in investigating the questiion of Muslim tolerance, or the tolerance of Muslim clerics.

Now let us go to Obama, and the question of whether Obama is a Muslim. As set forth in my previious article, Bill Maher and I agree that Obama is neither a Christian nor a Muslim Maher and I agree, with evidence, that Obama does not believe in any religion, but is a "secular humanist" (leftist ideology being his religioin). But Obama keeps SAYING these things, and not saying things, that indicate he has no clue about the danger of Islamic extremism in the world. This is NOT a matter of "guilt by association". This is a matter of Muslim extgremists out there deliberately and directly inciting hate and murder. No, that is not all Muslims. But there is a LARGE element of Islamic extremism in worldwide Islam. I would put the percentage of Muslims who either advocate or sympathize with extremist Muslim jihadist thinking at 1/3. Whether that is high or low--and it is surely lower in the United States--the percentage of viciously intolerant Muslims in the world is simply too high. Too many o fthem are open to truely vicious and deadlyl policies toward Christians, women, homosexuals and others who "violate" the RELIGIOUS teaching of extremist Islam.

How best to describe the unreal fantasy world of Barack Obama that leads so many people (including my own mother, who I have labeled a kook for that reason, altong with others who have the same delustion) to believe that Obama is a Muslim? The best way I can thnk of to describe Obama's (and CNN's and so on) outrageous state of denial about Islamic extremism is Maynard G. Krebs. Yes, that is the TV character in the old Dobie Gillis TV show. Krebs (sp.?--doesn't matter) had a total aversion to the word "work". He could not say it in a normal voice. Either he could not say it at all, or it came out as a panicky shriekk. Obama, most of the mainstream media, and most leftist Democrats can't even say the term "Islamic extremism". They CHOKE on it. This leads to absurd attempts by Obama Administration people to deny that the recent attack in Germany, the killings at Ft. Hood, the Christamas bomber, the Times Square omber, etc. represent acts--or attempted acts--of terrorism by Islamic extremists (inspired by other Islamic extremists)..

This is almost a mental illness with Obama, and those who think like Obama (again, reference Maynard G. Krebs and his pobia as to the word "work"). This would merely be a sad thing if it did not put the lives of all Americans at risk--including you and me. We need to look at our enemies in the world with a clear eye, and not through the lens of a politically correct PHOBIA. No, ALL Msulims are not our enemy. But too many Islamic extremists are, and those enemies are not limited to al-Qaida.

Yes, Obama is a comic genius. But the sad neurosis beneath that comic genius is a truly scary thing. Chris Matthews is merely an evil hypocrite (true of CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the mainstream media), as comic genius Obama corrrectly points out.