Union Propaganda and the Mainstream Media: Boycott Yahoo

Wis. Defeat Could Help Lauch Counterattack Against GOP" (headline from the AP, as featured on Yahoo "News", Unverse default page tonight)

I want you to read the above headline and MARVEL. Look at how truly incompetentit is, and then consider how it illustrates that the present mainstream media is all about PROPAGANDA and agenda.

Was the GOP "defeated" in Wisconsin? Of course not. But that is what the headline SAYS. Yes, it is the WINNING side that usually "launches" a counterattack. The headline is propaganda nonsense. The despicable AP simply culd not bring itself to use the term "union defeat", even though the story makes clear the story is talking about a union defeat.

You want to know just how MUCH propaganda is in this story? Consider what the story would have said if the public employee unions had WON in Wisconsin. Yes, the story would have said that the unions were going to use their momentum to ATTACK the GOP around the country. Yes, along with everything else, the story is a LIE. Unions were alwyas going to use recent events to attack the GOP, and it does ot matter whether the unions succeeded in their campaign of intimidation and extortion in Wisconsin. It is absurd to suggewst that the union defeat will HELP them. That is simply dishonest. What is true is that the very battle was always going to be used by the unions to try to facilitate their TAKEOVER of the democratic process.

You say I am too harsh using the term "takeover" of the democratic process to describe what the public employee unions are trying to do? Not true. The public emplooyee uniions lost an election in Wisconsin, and tried to reverse that defeat by subverting democracy. If lyou deny that, you should be condemend to observe for 24 hours a tape of the unions ATTACKING the Wisconsin capitol building, to try to keep the legislature from acting. What if the Tea Party had ATTACKED the U.S. Senate and House chambers, and the White House, durng the health care debate?

"Civility" anyone? You notice that the mainstream mediais no longer saying ANYTHING about "civility". That is because they are the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. Ever since the health care debate began, and especially after the Fiffords shooting, the mainstream media used the word "civility" as a PROPAGANDA WEAPON against the Tea Party (which never did anything as disrluptive as what the unions have done in Wisconsin). Now they have simply reversed themselves, without shame (because they have no shame)--calling the union protesters "passionate".

Did you ever see a Yahoo "News" headline saying: "Obama Defeat Could Help Tea Party Launch Counterattack against Democrats". Of course you didn't. That is because the mainstream media is now all about PROPAGANDA. They don't really even pretend anymore, except as a tactical matter. Yes, the defeat of the Tea Party in the passage of the Obama health care bill DID result in a counterattack. But you will note that a VICTORY by the Tea Party in the health care bill would have had the same result (unless, of course, Obama had actduallly abandoned his disgraceful approach to the heatlh care bill, and had moved toward a truly "bipartisan" bill--bad as such a bill would probably have been).

Now if the mainstream media wanted to say that the way that Governor Walker "rammed" through the bill in Wisconsin has some similarities to the way Obama, Pelosi and Redi rammed through the unpopular health cae bill, and could have some of the same results, I would regard that as a legitimate point. No, I don't regard it as the same. It was DEMOCRATS in Wisconsin who left the state, and abandoned all democratic process. If you want to say that Democrats, and the unions, might have had a beef about the ORIGINAL process of pushing the bill in Wisconsis, then there might be a similarity--although I consider the analogy flawed. But as it is, Democrats were simply violating both legal and democratic procedure by going "on the lam".. And unions were, and are, using intimiidation to try to get their way, after losing a democratic election. But all of that is beside the pint that you will NEVER see the mainstream media saying that what the Repubicans did in Wisconsin is the same as Obama, Pelosi and Reid did in Washington. That would not fit their agenda, because they willl not cirticize Obama, Pelosi and Reid in that way.

Yes, the "Anti-American, Despicable Associated Press" remains as bad as any "news" organization in any universe (known and unknown), because it is impossible to be worse. BOYCOTT YAHOO. That is because Yahoo--as I have detailed over the past two years--features nothing but AP propaganda--NO opposing voices on the Uverse default page. I do not forgive Yahoo for that, even though I know that Yahoo does not generate the stories. If yo distribute Nazi propaganda, does it matter twhether you generate it? No, I am not saying this is Nazi propaganda. I am just making the point that Yahooo is just as guilty for distributing propaganda as the despicable AP is for putting it out.

Read that headline again. Then try to defend it. If you think you can, you should apply to work for the despicable, and incompetent, AP. I am still on my Sodom and Gomorrah search (now expanded to CNN, since I can now handle audio better than I can read) for an honest aP reporter. I still have not found one. As I have repeeatedly stated, I would advise you not to look if you see somethiing strange happening to an aP office, or a CNNN office (or even a Yahoo office). I would not want you to turn into a pillar of salt.

P.S. Note, as usual, that the above has neither been proofread or spell checked (same bad eyesight that makes my AP Sodom and Gomorrah search more difficult).

BOYCOTT YAHOO.