Wisconsin and CNN: All Propaganda All of the Time

CNN has long ago droppped any pretense of being a "neutral" "news' organization, but it is actually getting worse. It reallly is "all propaganda, all of the time". As I have stqated, my Boston lawyer older daughter--an Obama supporter---has told me: "Everyone knows CNN is partisan. Don't they have a right to be?" No, the sanctimonious hypocrites don't have a "right" to assert they are "journalists" presenting "news', when they are not. And CNN is WORSE than Fox News. Fox News may have an overall conservative bias, but it DOES provide different points of view (and even some pretty liberal hosts). But ALL of CNN is like Sean Hannity. What "conservative" guests appear are there only to be attacked and/or dismisssed. Most importantly, howver, CNN does not even COVER any news that disagrees with their agenda (Reverend Wright, for example, until they had no choice). Nope. You are wrong. Fox News DOES cover (tto much, in my view, as I don't endorse Fox News) the news being presented by CNN and the AP (see previous article).

Yes, Wisconsin is a case in point. After the Giffords shooting, CNN--on the half hour, or more frequently, kept talking about "anti-government" ANGER and LACK of CIVILITY. That has now been exposed as mere propaganda. You can't get any more anti-government anger than the union example in Wisconsin. And there have been DEATH THREATS (prtty much ignored on CNN, when they were featured on the half hour is someone alleged such threats against a Democrat in the health care debate). Then there was tlat virtual assatult on the legislature by protesters, as unions tried to shut down the government in Wisconsin (as did those Democrat state senators),. For CNN, this is all suddenly "passionate" expressions of democracy in action. CNN does not even attempt to explain these whiplash reversals. That is because CNN is all propaganda all of the time. They are also the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four.

Yes, luckily no one watches CNN. That is why I have compared my own detailed examinatiion of CNN (The Liar Network) to "attacking a gnat with a nuclear weapon". So why do it do i? This should be obvious to you. I am using CNN (which is why I surf it, rather than boycott it like all of the rest of the public--even if unconsciously)? I am using CNN jsut like I used to use the despicable AP (for the last 7 years)--as typical of the mainstream media--and left--as a whole. I can't read like I once could, and therefore CNN is a more convenient place to find typical leftist thinking. I think my generally leftist older daughter would agree with that: that CNN is a place to find typical leftist thinking. My older daughter is not dumb (she did graduate from Cornell law school, while I only graduated from the University of Texas School of Law); she is just misguided (one of the shames of my life being that I could not raise my daughers to be right thinking conservatives, even though CNN is among the leftists who forced me to shame myself by coming out of the closet as more of a feminist than those in the mainstream media and on the rest of the left).

Yes, my article on Sunday PREDICTED the propaganda blitz on MUSLIMS (and how Peter King is picking on them). All propaganda all of the time. Every half hour. Poor Peter King was given no chance. Before he even began his hearing, he had been the subject of a propaganda blitz ALL WEEK. CNN: All propaganda, all of the time. There was no pretense of objectivity. No examination of extremist Muslim hate speech and doctine (the kind of thing that CREATED al-Qaida). Yes, you would never learn from CNN that al-Qaida came out of the extremis version of Islam taught in Saudi Arabia. It is that hate theology that is our problem and not just al-Qaida. See Frederick Forsyth's excellent analysis of the origins of the Taliban and al-Qaida in "The Afghan" (fiction, but the factual information is correct). CNN is not interested in looking into extremist Muslim hate speech. CNN is into "all propaganda, all of the time".

No, all Muslimms are not extremists. But it is too mcuh a part of the ORGANIZED Muslim religion around the world. I was amused when a CNN "reporter" (all propaganda, all of the time) said that the primary image to come out of Pter King's first day was of a SINGLE MUSLIM FIREFIGHTER who died on 9/11. All propaganda, all of the time. So what? ONE MUSLIM. And no one is saying all Muslims are bad. What the sane ones among us are saying is that MUSLIM EXTREMISTS are bad (for us and Muslims in general), and that such extremists are a dangerous part of worldwide Islam (way beyond al-Qaida, as such extremists are the creators of al-Qaida). If these Muslim extremists do not represent all Muslims, how is it relevant that SOME Muslims are heroes? it is not relevant, but CNN--and the other apologists for Islamic extremists--simply ignore this dishonesty and hypocrisy. For them, every example of "good" Muslim behavior does represent all Msulims, while examples of bad Muslim behavior (no matter that it is the result of substantial hate speech in the Mulsim community worldwide) does ot represent anything other than that one individual.

CNN (he Liar Network): All propaganda, all of the time.