Thursday, March 3, 2011

Rodney King, Yahoo and the Depicable Associated Press (Boycott Yahoo for Obsession with Race)

Qucik. What are the five main "news" stories tonight? You say you don't know? well, neither does Yahoo nor the "Anti-American, Despicable Associated Press" (complete, official name). (BOYCOTT YAHOO). This is one of the FEATURED Yahoo "News" stories now showing on my Uverse default page:

LA police chief says that King beating will not repeat."

Say what? We are talking about RODNEY KING here--not Martin Luther King, Jr. Why is some sort of anniversary of the RODNEY King beating that important? No, it was not that important in the firt place, and the riots over the initial verdict were ridiculous. Yuo will notice that there were not riots over the O.J. Simpson verdict (probably more questiionable). Will the LA police chief say that the RIOTS over a single questionable verdict will not occur again? For God's sake, it was a beating by the police. Not really defensible, but how many beatings have police given to people over the year--SOME police--that were unjustifiable (and yet had noothing to do with race)? I don't think you can count them. Our mainstream media is simply OBSESSED with rac defining people and events: the primary definition of a racist. Yes, I just called our mainstream media people--most of them--RACISTS. But I have proven that to be true time and time again.

You doubt me on this? Don't. Look at that headline quoted above. Look how BAD it is. It is not just a matter of the Rodney Kink beating not being worth an "anniversary". At most, it was one scumbag being beaten by some police scumbag bullies. But that headline is about the OPINION of the LA pplice chief as to whether such a beating will happen again. Again, this is not Martin Luther King, Jr. What does that even MEAN? Is the LA police chief sayig that there will never be another balleged beating of a balck man again by white police officers? Is he saying that the police will negver again beat a person they arrest without sufficient justification? Who knowss. The despicable Yahoo, the despicable AP, and the LA police chief all think it just SOUNDS GOOD to say this. Read my previous article about modern "journalists" (as Hillary Clinton and I agree) not being interested in real INFORMATION. The OPINOION of the LA police chiefe as to future events he does not control is a perfect example of not being interested in REAL INFORMATION.

Still doubt m? Your eally are a fool, aren't you. Maybe you should apply for a job with the AP or Yahoo. Let us take the most favorable explanation of what the LA police chief said. Let us assume that the original Rodney King beating was all about race (somewhat questionable, although there is a case the subsequent riot was about race, along with simply opportunity thugism). Ask yourself this question: How can the LA police chief KNOW that the same kind of beating will never occurf again? It is the mainsteammedia, of course, that is saying our society is just as racist now as it has ever beeen, or more so (false, unless you are talking about the mainstream media itself).. Is the LA police chief psychic? Nope. This is an ABSURD "news" story. To make this much out of an anniversary of the Rodney King beating is absurd in itself. But to make this much out of an OPINION AS TO THE FUTURE of an LA police chief is beyond absurd.

Q.E.D. this again proves the point I have been making for more than 7 years: Ther is no worse "news" organizeation in this or any other universe than the despicable AP, because it is impossible to be worse. Yes, this certaily includes Al Jazeera in the comparison, as I said years ago (B.C. before Hillary Clinton). See my previious article.

BOYCOTT YAHOO.

No comments: