Muslims and CNN: The Evil, Anti-American, Anti-Christian Network

"Should Fear of Terrorism Outweigh Freedom of Religion" That is the tag line CNN has used forseemingly weeks to "promote" its Sunday "special". The tagline alone is evil stuff, and negates any possibililty of neutrality in the story itself. Did lyou know that NOBODY (I mean absolutely nobody, including the worst anti-Muslim bigot) advocates that FEAR of terrorism should outweigh freedom of religion in this country. Doubt me? Don't. That is a CNN lie--a lie from The Liar Network. Consider this headline: "Should Terrorism Outweigh Freedom of Religioin" That is actually a more neutral headline, but you can see why CNN did not use it (especially since CNN was interested in propaganda and not "truth". My headline could be regarded as sugesting that Muslims are assumed to aid terrorism. But the CNN headline more directly assumes that no Muslims in the United States are committing terrorism, or aiding terrorism, in the United States, which we know to be false (Ft. Hood shooter, Times Square bomber, 9/11 hijackers, and so on)> In fact, CNN condemned Congressman Peter King for merely INVESTIGATING the question of how much Islamic extremism has penetrated into the American Muslim community. Note that Peter King's hearing did NOTHING to "freedom of religiion". We had it before the hearing, and had it afterward. Now is it not part of the EXTREMIS Muslim religioni that Americans (and other infidels) whould be killed? Yes, it is. As I have said before, the problem is that the extremist part of Islam is way to big a part of that religion (much bigger than insane Christian sects, although the anti-Christian bigotts at CNN pay much more negative attention to fringe Christian groups who may do something like picket soldier's funerals or say they are going to bun the Koran/Quran). To CNN, extremist Christians taint the whole religion and the whole country, while extremist Muslims are to be pretty much ignored. I digress. The point of this paragraph is that you do NOT have a "right" to commit, or conspire to commit, a secular crime in the name of your religion. Thus, Muslim terrorists cannot defend themselves on the basis that their religion--in which they believe--compels them to cmmit terrorism. Similarly, if a religion favors human sacrifice, you are out of luck. The CRIME does "outweigh" "freedom of religion". And anyone who wants to STOP Muslims from practicing their religion (as distinguished from saying a mosque at Ground Zero is a bad idea which reflects badly n the Muslims advocateing it, and on CNN and other leftists advocateing it) are not advocateing doing so on the basis of FEAR of terrorism. They have to be advocating that Muslims--the particular Muslims they want to stop--are conspiring to commit terrorism, or some other crime. Otherwise, this is just an example of CNN either distorting "freedom of religioni" (as with the Peter Knng inquiry) or elevating some FRINGE group of people into being representative of the entire United States--where, of course, the federal courts will. step in. Okay, you say, CNN may be as biased as you say, and the tagline you quote is ridiculous (since NO ONE says FEAR of terrorism should outweigh freedom of religion), but you know what CNN is TRYING to say. They are trying to say that the FACTS do not support that Muslims in the United States are terrorists, or suppport terrorism. Actually, I do not know that. CNN is not interested in FACTS. CNN is interested in an anti-American, anti-Christian AGENDA. Furtehr, as stated, it is clear that SOME Muslims in, or who once were in, the United States either or terrorists or aid terrorists. Now I am willing to believe that there is little evidence that mosques in the United States are involved in terrorist activity, but I am certainly not going to ASSUME that is the case if there is evidence to the contrary. Without evidence to the contrary, there is no problem, because our courts--unlike courts in Muslim countries with Crhistians--will step in to protect "freedom of religiion". And it a mosque is a COVER for terrorist activity and support, "freedom of religion" is not applicable (on the "human sacrifice" principle). Still doubt me? Consider the Catholic Church. The people of CNN are clearly anti-Catholic bigots (unless lyou are not really a Catholic, like Nancy Pelosi). But that is not exactly the point here. Consider this headline (and it is not that far fetched): "Does Fear of Pedophilia Outweigh Freedom of Religioin" Yes, CNN---among many others, including me--criticized The Catholic Church for HARBORING (mainlly) homosexual priests who took advantage of young men and boys. Is pedophilia worse than terrorism? On this level of evil, comparisons make little sense. But I submit terrorism is at least as bad as pedophilia. IF a Muslim group is protecting/harboring terrorists, or aiding them, then I have no problem going after those groups. I realize that people did not actualy get rid of Catholic churches, or stop them from being built--that I am aware of--but Caholic churches were certainly INVESTIGATED. And people were looking into a COVER UP by the POPE. I think there were calls to PROSECUTE bihshops, and maybe some suggestions that the Pope had committed a crime. I am talking about prosecution of the cover up/harboring. No, don NOT tell me that CNN is interested in this kind of story with regard to Muslims. The next investigation by CNN of Muslim extremism, and toleration of terrorism, will be essentially the FIRST. Have I told you that the people of the mainstream media are the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth? I know I have. No, I don't think we should PREVENT mosques from being built--even at Ground Zero, unless we can prove a mosque is just a cover for a terrorist cell (almost, I think, impossible). But what if mosques in the United States are oppressing women? Homosexuals? Abusing people who do not fit their orthodoxy? The idea that Muslims are IMMUNE from criticism and investigation is simply absurd. Ask the Catholic Church, which did avoid a certain amount of scrutiny in the name of freedom of relision, but paid a heavy price in media and public condemnation. Remember those pedophile pritests. And the industrial grade hypocrites, and anti-Catholic biogts, at CNN even raised the alleged "hypocrisy" of Peter King because he had once met with the IRA. Yes, the IRA was heavlily associated with Irish Catholics, although the IRA did not act in the NAME of their religion based on supposed religious doctrine. This was sheer biogry, and sophistry, on the part of CNN, since the IRA has nothing to do with whethr Muslims in the United States are supporting terrorism. And is CNN saying we should not have investigated American support of TERRORISTS in the IRA, even though the IRA never did much in the U.S.? Back to pedophile priests. I will make this flat statement: There are MORE Islamic extremist clerics in the world supporting terrorism--including the entire theocracy of Iran--than there are pedophile priests in the world. And the pedophile priests are clearly not acting in the name of their religion. But, you sputter, there are no such clerics supporting Muslim terrorism IN THE UNITED STATES. How do you know? YOu are not going to know from the Obama Administratiioin, which refuses to condemn Muslim extremism. You are not going to know from CNN, or the mainstream media. Peter King's hearing was pretty much sabotaged before it ever began--by CNN and other leftist Democrats. Want more evidence of the hypocrisy of CNN. Remember Sarah Palin---the 2008 campaign, I mean. CNN made a point of the PENTECOSTAL chruch to which Palin ONCE belonged, as did so many on the left. Talk about religiious BIGOTRY--the "speaking in tongues". Yes, I am willing to make another flat statement: "Speaking in tongues" is NOT as bad as Muslim extremism, much less terrorism. In fact, I have no reason to believe it is bad at all. And then there is the bigoted Associated Press--see my article during the campaign), which did a story about how Mitt Romeny's GREAT GRANDFATHER was a polygamist--an attempt by the AP at anii-Mormon bigotry. Of courfse, MUSLIMS have long practiced polygamy more than Christians--more than Mormons after Mormons officially condemned it in the 19th Century. In fact, Obama's GRANDFATHER probably practiced polygamy. Yep. These are the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. Yes, the official name of CNN is "The Evil, Anti-American Network". Nicknames include "The Liar Network" and "The Bigoted Network". What is anti-American about this CNN story/headline? Well, I essentially tell you above. But, in case you work for CNN or the mainstream media, I will lay it out for you. CNN is saying Muslims are PERSECUTED in the United States, and their "freedom of religion" denied, when that is simply not true. And that has the potential of getting Americans KILED. It is anti-American, because it labels us all by "guilt by association", and deliberatelly confuses "freedom of religion" with "freedom from criticism". CNN is silling to cirticize a fringe Christian minister in Florida as representative of the entire United States, and all Christians, while CNN is willing to call criticism of MUSLIM EXTREMISM as "anti-Muslim" and a violation of "freedom of religion". Yes, there may be ISOLATED "persecution" of Muslims, and violations of freedom of religion, in the United States. But we have REMEDIES. For CNN to keep sayhing that these isolated items are typical of the Unnited States, or a major danger to freedom of religion in this country, IS anti-American. It is also EviL, because it tends to JUSTIFY Muslims in the idea that Americans are just as bad as they are (taliking here about MODERATE Muslims, since there is almost no Muslim country in the world that gives the kind of freedom of religion to Christians that we give to Muslims, and everybody else). Yes, I repeat, CNN is committing EVIL, and may well be responsiblie for KILLING AMERICANS. Can it get worse? Yes, with the anti-American CNN it can. I saw the main public face of the CNN "secial" promoting her program. Lest you doubt that I have pegged the anti-American CNN exactly correctly, let me try to give you a picture of what she said. She said that she thought pro-democracy PROTESTORS in the Arab world are giving Americans a better impression of Muslims--virtually stating that Americans are too prejudiced against Muslims. And note hnow STUPID that statement is. Nope. "Pro-democracy" protestors do NOT give me a better view of Muslims, and they should not. In th efirst place, it is CNN PROGANGA that you are condemning all Muslims if you conndemn MUSLIM EXTREMISTS who gave rise to al-Qaida and Iran in the first place. Further, those "protestors" in the Arab world are MOBS composed of many people--some good and some bad. I will have a better view of SOME MUSLIMS if those MOBS in the Arab world actually succeed in creating a DEMOCRATIC REPUBIC. No, even Indonesia and Turkey are hardly models of tolerance and religioius freedom, although they are better than most Arab countries. IF we can reach a point where some NON-MUSLIM (already going to Hell, by definition) can print CARTOONS OF MUHAMMAD and not have riots in Muslim areas across the world, TEHN I will really start getting a better opinion of Muslims. Note that CNN has no trouble associating Muslims overseas with Muslims here. Of course, the terrorist Muslim cleric out of Yemen was onece an American. But I am willing to believe that AMERICAN Muslims are better than the Muslim extremists, and many intolerant "moderates", that we find in so much of the world. CNN evidencely considers Muslims all the SAME, and that criticisms of any of them violates "freedom of religion" because of "fear". Q.E.D. CNN IS The Evil, Anti-American Network. It IS The Liar Network. It IS The Bigoted Network. And CNN continues to be my stand in for the whole mainstream media, where they are all just about as bad. P.S. Nope. No proofreading or spell checking (eyesight), as usual. P.P.S. I hate Google, and Computors. I just noticed that Google--probably some wrong button I pushed--has CHANGED the paragraphing from what I saw on the screen when I composed the last two articiles. In other words, there are no paragraphs. Let it be a challenge to you. I don't know that I can see well enough to correct it. Sorry about that (as I always knoew I could be Maxwell Smart).