Peter King and CNN: An Evil Network Spreads Evil

Yes, CNN has spent an enrite week putting out propaganda opposing Peter King's hearings on ISLAMIC EXTREMISM and its penetration in American life (not, despite the opposing propaganda, an attack on all Muslims, or an investigation as to whether Muslim ms in general are good Americans). See my previous articles, since the prescient one last Sunday. But this article is about EVIL (CNN evil), and not just about the normal CNN propaganda.

Yes, CNN did an ad mominem attack on Peter King accusing him of being a hypocrite (talk about the pot calling the kettle black) because (allegedly) Peter King had once been too cozy with the IRA (the nati-British, anti-Protestant organization based mainly in Northern Ireland that had a terrorist element--not much different from EXTREMIST Muslims having a terrorist element in al-Qaida).

Why is this EVIL stuff, and not merely partisan propaganda? If you don't know this, I despari for you. . But I will tellly you anyway. It is evil because it represents what Bill Clinton called the POLITICS OF PERSONAL DESTRUCTION. It represents an attempt to not merely oppose Peter King politcially, but an attempt to DESTROY him with allegations at least a decade old.

You don't understand this. Let me explain it to you, and in the process explain to you why CNN contains the worst hypocritews to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. Remember Barack Obama and his association with TERRORISTwilliamAyers? Wel, CNN did not think that was "news". You can argue the point (although it shows lthe hypocrisy of CNN). But let us go further. What if President Obama wanted to call a conference on "civility" in American politics, and he was called a HYPOCRITE because he had associated with Ayers (a clear advvocate of violetn terrorism, and an actual terrorist). Would CNN ever present that as even arguable "news"? Of course not. It would be an EVIL attempt to deflect the issue of "civility" by arguing over Obama's association with Ayers (an old issue of the 2008 campaign, which is where I disagree with Sean Hannity continuing to bring it up as a signficiant current issue).

Does it matter to the questioin of whether we should look into Islamic extremism whether Peter King once was "soft" on the IRA? Of course it does not matter, and that is exactly the position CNN would take with a CONSERVATIVE or Republican allegation of a similar kind. But CNN is composed on partisan hypocrites, and those people do not care if they are consistnet. In fact, like President Obama himself, they are willing to take oposite positions on consecutive days (as they basically have done with the issue of "civiity" and union incivility in Wisconsin).

Any allegations of Peter King being "soft" on the IRA are OLD poltical allegations that cannot possibly have anything to do with the merits of King's hearing on Islamic extremism. Indeed, CNN well knows that there is no way to "resolve" those allegations at the present time. CNN merely hoped, as did Kin'g opponets, that the mere QUESTION of "hyposcrisy" could be used to discredit King on a PERSONAL level (a mominem attack--attack against th eperson--on a "where there is smoke there is fire" theory of evil pllitics).

You sill don't think this was EVIL by an EVIL NETWORK. Think again. Was CNN not playing on the BIGOTED idea that the Irish in general were too forgiving of the activities of the terrorist wing of the IRA? Of course it was. This is the same EViL that the hypocritges at CNN said lthey opposed with regard to King's hearling: the idea that Muslims are involved with Islamic extremism merely by being Muslims. Yes, if Peter King had been PROVEN to be a TERRORIST, thqat might be relevant (although hardlyl dispostivive of whether we should investigatge the pnetration of Islamic extremism in the United States). However, the allegation that King was "sympathetic" to the IRA is the kid of thing that would take a hearing in itself to even come close to investigating, and even then the result would surely be inconclusive. And the IRA is hardly a current terrorist threat to the United States (wherfe it never was much of a terrorist threat--not to the extent it was in Britan and Northern Ireland).

Yes, the whole IRA thing was an EVIL attempt by CNN to hold its own Kangaroo Court "hearing" on a totally irrelevant "issue": the issue of Peter King's OLD "association" (alleged) with the IRA. Well, CNN, where is your investigation as to President Obama's ASSOCIATIONS--especailly old ones.? Ask Sean Hannity if you want to know the "issues" that could be raised--with at least as much allegation of "hypocrisy" as with Peter King.

And see my previous article on the possibl eHYPOCRISY of Obama claiming to be a Christian, when he does not really believe in any religion at all, other than the leftist "religion" of secular humanism. You will not see that alleged hypocrisy even mentioned on CNN, because CNN is composed totally of dishonest hypocrites. Yes, I have my doubts whether Barack Obabama's religion, even if hypocrisy is involved, is "news'. But neither is this PERSONAL ATTACK on Peter King "news".

This is EVIL stuff, because it (the personal attack on Peter King about something that cannot be reolvesd, and happened long ago) is an IRREWLEVANT personal attack for POLITICAL REASONS. It had no legitimate purpose, other than to try to destroy King personally.

Nope. C NN is an evil network spreading evil.. The lpersonal attack on King is another example of this. Stay tuned for tomorroww's planned article about the EVILS being spread by CNN (an article which will not even deal with the evil political propaganda of CNN).