Yes, it is one of the most disgraceful headlines I have ever seen, and one of the most stupid. But what can you expect from the "Anti-American, Despicable Associated Press" (complete, official name), which continues to prove that there is no worse "news" organization in any UNIVERSE (because it is impossible t be worse). Yes, it is another one of those featured headlines on Yahoo "News" (boycott Yahoo)., which is what I see on my AT&T default page as I go online (which I leave deliberately for material for this blog). Here is the offending headline TODAY (Sunday)--not the week of the bin Laden raid:
"Raid on bin Laden Raid Avenged Ft. Hood Massacre"
You poor fool, you, may have thought that the bin Laden raid avenged 9/11, and needed no more justification. You might further believe, correctly, that it DIMISHES :(even demeans) the raid to look around for other slates to wipe clean, as if you were a police chief or sheriff trying to clear a murder by blaming it on a captured serial killer (or trying to gain publicity for yourself by getting in on the glorly of a captured serival killer).
The Shadow: "Skip, Skip, Skip. You are a serial liar with these false headlines of yours. Here is the correct headline from the AP, although I admit it is puzzling why this was "news" today":
"Raid on bin Laden Compound Avenged CIA Deaths"
Skip: "Hasn't Homeland Seucirty caught you yet? I notice that, like serial killers, you have adopted a name for your serial hacking.
The Shadow: Homeland Security can't catch anyone unless the person is handed to them. Too much political corretness, which I guess is the point of your stupid headline. But, Skip, you have to stop these FALSE headlines. You know you changed the headline.
Skip: "Okay. So you caught me. Your headline is corret. I changed the actual headline, because I thought mine was just as good, or better, than the desgraceful Yahoo/AP headline. What the Hell did the bin Laden raid have to do with "CIA deaths"? Was the CIA really looking HARDER for bin Laden because of CIA deaths in Pakistan or Afghanistan, or elsewhere? This is so STUPID that I can't stqand it. The preventable Ft. Hood massacre was traced to al-Qaid in Yemen, and you can say that the bin Laden raid "avennged" any number of things, if you simply want to MANUFACTURE a sotlry every day on the bin Laden raid. We already know that the bin Laden raid is one of the greatest events in the history of mankind (not), but this is beyond ridiculous. When President Bush was in office, Nancy Pelosi AND the mainstream media played down the significance of getting bin Laden, just in case Bush did that. But these are the worst hypocrites who ever walked the Earth, on two legs or four. Yes, getting bin Laden was a good thing. But it hardly "avenges" every single death of an American at the hands of Islamic militants.
Or is the AP saying that we would not have conducted a raid in violation of Pakistani soverignty except to avenge the CIA? No. The despicable AP can't be saying that, evn if you have a sneaking suspicion that President Obama might be so petty as to look at the raid in terms of avenging some slight against HIM. But even I don't think Obama acted for petty vengance. Bin Laden was an international terrorist. As stated it demeans the whole thing to make this PERSONAL with the CIA--as if it were some act of vengeance against PAKISTAN.
The more I think about this disgraceful headline, the more it makes me angery."
The Shadow: Okay, Skip. I actually understand your anger. I admit I don't understand the purpose of this headline, or story. However, you really have to stop theses faslse headlines, or you will keep hearing from me. And Homeland Seucrity is not going to save you. The Shadow knows what evil lurks in your heart."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment