I actually watched part of "News Watch" (dishonest wimps that they are) on Saturday. There subject was a DHISHONES poll featured in a story by the "Anti-American, Despicable Associatged Press" (complete, offical name) last week. EVERYONE apparently agrees the poll was inaccurate, but the people of "News Watch" made a special point of syaying that they did not believe the desicable Associated Press, was a partisan organization. Hogwash. For SEVEN Y:EARS< I have--mroe than any other person alive--PROVEN that the despicable Associated Press is a partisan political organization only interested in AGENDA and PROPAGANDA. I have done so citging EXAMPLES every single time. If "News Watch" wants ot go back seven years in this blog, and dsiput the record, be my guest. You will forgive me if I continue to regard Fox as part of the mainstream media problem and not part of the solutinon.
Now this blog has shown you, time and tie again, that ALL polls are flawed, evil things which you should SABOTAGE (by not cooperating or lying). That incudes polls with which I "agree", as well as polls clearly designed to be propaganda against my point of view. But the despidable AP, as featured (as usual) on Yahoo "News", commissioned a poll (conflict of interest as bad as that of any politician, and making the AP PART of tghe "news" rather than "reporting" it). This was a poll on Obama's "approval rating" right aftr the bin Laden raid (meaning the poll is totally meaningless, under the best and most "scientific" of circumstances).
Problem: The despicable AP publichshed a headline saying that Obama had an "approval rating" of 60%, when it was obviouis that there was NO basis for saying that. Yes, it is a LIE the way every single poll is "reported", because they ALL are "reported" as if the number is a concrete number instead of an ESTIMATE subject to any number of EXPECTED inaccuracies and errors. At best, polls are vague snaphsots with an enoromous margin of error (actually almost a 100% potential margin of error from the laws of chance alone). But the AP poll made it IMPOSSIBLE for the pll bo be anything but propaganda. The poll ased its question of 46% Democrats and 29% Repubicans. That ALONE (the discrepancy in Democrats and Republicans in the sample) was enough to totally explain the result. The "60% approval rating" translates to "50% approval rating" (about to be expectded right after the bin Laden raid) if you EVEN OUT the Repubicans and Democrats. That is basically what "News Watch" said--saying it was a "bad poll". . Propaganda, right, from POLITICAL HACKS OF THE DESPICABLE AP AND YAHOO?
Nota so fast, said ALL of the people of "News Watch". It was just a bad poll. Could happen any time, to anyone. What I want to know is whether the people of "News Watch" know that they just TRASHED Fox "News", and EVERy other "news" outlet who reports a poll as if the numbers have meaning. If polls are so unreliable (and they are), WHY are they reported as NEWS? is this not a LIE--very single time that any poll is reported as a "news" event? Of course it is.
Did I not just agree that the AP could have been the "victim" of a bad poll? Yes and no. It is the AP which REPORTED the poll, as if the number was CERTAIN and CONCRETE. The AP knew--in fact reported--the "internals" of the poll. The AP, and Yahoo, nevertheless did the headline as if the poll was SOLID proof of Obama's "approval rating". THAT is the PROPAGANDA, and what again proves that the despicable AP is a dishonest, partisan political organization which always has an agenda.
Can I say the same about "Newws Watch" and Fox "News"? Damn right I can. The AGENDA here is to avoid discrediting polls as vehiles for PARISAN POLITICS (especially in today's world). In ofther words, there is a MEDIA bias here in favor of the MEDIA-unwiling to tell you the truth about the media itself.
Looking at the above, I am afraid I pulled my punches with regard to the despicable AP. Let me be clear: There is no worse "news" organization in ANY UNIVERSE than the Associated Press--a dishonest, cinompetent, politically partisan, propaganda organization with an agenda (always). I have spent 7 years of my life showing you that. I may have failed with you, but no one on Fox is going to convince me that black is white. They are just gong to further convince me that Fox is not worth watching or listening to. What? How can I say there is no worse "news" organization in ANY universe than the despicable AP? Wht aobut other planets, or even other universes? Am I saing I am omnipotent? Well, I practically am. But that is not the point heree . There is no worse "news" organizatioin than the AP, in any universe, because it is IMPOSSIBLE to be worse than the AP. It cannot be done. (BOYCOTT YAHOO--which relies almost exclusively on the despicable AP for its daily "news").
P.S. No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight). But at least I am not an AP "reproter". The onlly honorable course for such a creature is to fall on his sword, or pen. That would be such a "reporter's" main contriubution to the human race. These are EVIL people spreading EVIL. As stated I have spent 7 years showing this to be true, and every day further proves it. I mean it as a simple statement of factd, and not hyperbole.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment