Pro-Terrorist Propaganda, Continued

You can read the excerpts from this latest pro-terrorist propaganda story and immediately realize it is worthless in terms of providing accurate information.   Biased people, who ALREADY believe it is TORTURE to even keep terrorists awake like Janet Reno's Justice Department did to women and children (plus David Koresh) in Waco.   A "medical examination" (including subjective "mental" examination) by people like these is of NO value.  Among other things, of course, these people are going to blieve antything the American ENEMY former detainees tell them.  The whole purpose of this exercise is obviously PROPAGANDA, and not some sort of search for "the truth".

However, let us parse those two representative paragraphs I quoted.

"....Physicians for Human Rights had doctors and mental health professionals examine 11 former prisoners. The group alleges finding evidence of U.S. torture and war crimes and accuses U.S. military health professionals of allowing the abuse of detainees, denying them medical care and providing confidential medical information to interrogators that they then exploited."

Look at the terminoly:  "evidence of torture and WAR CRIMES" (emphasis added).  This is not the language of any kind of nuetral investigation.  It is the language of PROPAGANDA.  By repeating it without contratidiction or contrary caveats, lwhich the despicable AP/AOL would put in ANY story about a statement made by the U.S. military, the despicable Associated Press is merely engaging in PROPAGANDA, pure and simple.

But look at how bad the paragraph really is.  HOW can you tell a person was DENIED MEDICAL CARE by a medical examination YEARS LATER, from a medical examination?  You can't.  In fact, you probably could not right after the release.  That statement obviously relies on the STATEMENTS of the anti-American detainees (suspected terrorists) as to the alleged abuse.  This is a transparent attempt to USE the term "doctors" to give crediblity to the same allegations that leftists have been making fo r years.  Again, this attempt to bootstrap non-information into credibility is a standard technique of PROPAGANDA, and also a standard leftist technique ("People's Republic of China", or putting out a leftist statement using a bunch of former military officers or veterans to try to bolster the credibility of the--usually extremely dubious--leftist statement).

But look further.  Notice that incredible reference to medical  "confidentiality".  Who said suspected FOREIGN TERRORISTS had a "right" to medical confidentiality?  They clearly do NOT.  Among other things, do not interrogators NEED to know about medical conditions to avoid inadvertently HARMING the person being interrogated--for his own PROTECTION?  Of course the interrogators need that information.

The mere existence of that STUPID statement about medical confidentiality shows just how unreliable this PROPAGANDA is.

Then look at the despicable AP.  See that language  on "most extensive study". Of course, it is not a peer reviewed, scientific "study" at all.  It is merely a statement by an interested group.  However, look at that word, "extensive".    ELEVEN.   That is the total number of people studied.  GIVE ME A BREAK.