Monday, September 1, 2008

Sarah Palin and CNN: Wolf Blitzer, an Evil, Evil, Evil Person

Wolf Blitzer has become nothing but a Democratic political hack, if he ever was anything more.
 
See my earlier entry today on CNN as an EVIL network.  Rarely has one of my entries been reaffirmed so quickly, with Anderson Cooper in the role of GOOD GUY (I don't believe it either, although he was quickly turning to the Dark Side, like Wolf Blitzer, by the end of his interviews, as he let both Wolf and Kyra Phillips (next entry) get away with their EVIL SMEARS.
 
When Cooper went to Wolf Blitzer, after trying to suggest there was even a question as to whether the media should even comer this story at all (i.e.  CNN is an EVIL network--Anderson Cooper confirmed that they KNOW they are).  Wolf Bllitzer, to Cooper's obvious discomfort, suggested that Sarah Palin was a HYPOCRITE because her daughter got pregnant, when she was an "abstinence only" sex education advocate, with these family values.
 
Marvel at that last sentence awhile. Wolf Bllitzer is saying that Sarah Plain is a hypocrite because her DAUGHTER got pregnant, even though Palin herself beliefs in abstinence and abstinence sex education.
 
I should not have to explain this to you, but maybe some of you are as dumb as Wolf Blitzer (I hope not).  Wolf, I KNOW YOU.  I KNOW what you are doing.  You are so used to calling people with "family values" hypocrites--leftist political hack that you are--for their imperfections, that you don't even seen the illogic of using the word with regard to an imperfection of a DAUGHTER.
 
How is Sarah Palin a hypocrite, Wolf?  Tell me.  I want to know.  Is it because she did not put a blindfold on her daughter and shoot her at dawn?  Is it because Sarah Palin TOLD her daughter to go out and get pregnant?  Is it because Sarah Palin secretly had her daughter go to Planned Parenthood, or secretly made sure she had Planned Parenthood type sex education for 11 year olds? Is it because Sarah Palin pushed her daughter to have an abortion.  No.  Then WHY, Wolf did you LIE like that.  Why, snactimonious hypocrite that you are, did you suggest that it is okay to attack a candidate because of her DAUGHTER'S "sin", even though you would condemn that with regard to any Democrat.
 
Yes, I will TELL you Wolf, dumb as you are, how you led yourselfinto this trap, and went totally over to the Dark Side.  Yes, Wolf, I will TELL you how you became an EVIL, EVIL, EVIL person, who should just GO AWAY into the facility for the demented elderly where you belong. 
 
You led yourself into this trap because you have bought into the leftist absurdity that every member of every soical conservatives family must be PERFECT, or else the social conservative is a hypocrite.  Do leftists have to be perfect?  Of course not.  But social conservatives are BETTER than leftists, in the leftist view, and are REQUIRED to be perfect or they are letting other social conservatives down (even though the Christian Right believes we are all sinners--one of those beliefs that I think is beyond question, because it merely suggests that we are all human).
 
Okay, Wolf.  I have explained to you WHY your statements are absurd. I have explained to you WHY you are an evil person.  And I have explained to you HOW leftist Darth Vader's led you to the Dark Side with their illogical, political cant.
 
Time to take the honorable, Japanese way out before they commit you. 
 
Sorry, Wolf.  I had to do it, even though I have found out just today that I am a NICER person than you are, and than the rest of the people at CNN--not to mention most leftistsout there.  But I am afraid I am not yet THAT nice!

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why are we questioning CNN and their motives? Are we also going to question Putin's? Obvious. They are a disgusting network with frauds as anchors. Let's discuss Anderson Cooper hiding the fact that he is a homosexual when he portrays otherwise. His stories would have a little more clarity of his slanted views. Let's discuss all the facts about Obama's past. Let's discuss Biden's son and his problems. Or not. Pretty sad network.

Anonymous said...

First of all, if you want your argument to have any merit, I suggest that you build it on a foundation of logic - not emotion. Branding people whose political opinions are different than yours as "evil" isn't a very convincing argument.

Second, you raise the issue that social conservatives are expected to be "perfect", or are otherwise branded as "hypocrites". whereas, leftists are not required to live up to those standards.

My response to that point would be this: social conservatives strive to governmentally regulate private behavior. Examples of this would be: promoting abstinence-only sex education, curtailing a woman's right to choose, or outlawing homosexual marriage. It is because these representatives strive to regulate other people's private behavior, that their own lives are scrutinized when they don't practice the behavior that they preach. Whereas, liberal politicians generally don't want to regulate behavior in the private sphere - which is why they are generally not criticized as "hypocrites". That makes sense, right?