The Wall Street (mainly Democratic) establishment is for this bailout bill. They were probably for the establishment, mainly Democratic, bill to legalize illegal immigration (McCain-Kennedy, with Obama as a silent partner wanting even more open borders and welcoming of illegal immigrants). But we don't know that for sure, since the greedy Wall STreet establishment had no direct interest in the immigration bill.
The Bush Administration is for the Wall Street bailout bill (immediately endorsing every change Democrats wanted to make, in Bush's first speech after Congress started "debating" the bill (with House Republicans deliberately shut out). The Bush Administration was for the immigration bill, including any changes the Democrats wanted to make. You can't get any more "establishment" than that.
The Democrat establishment is for the Wall Street bailout bill. In fact, most Democrats are. The Deomcratic establishment was for the "Bush" immigration bill. In fact, most Democrats were. Democrats have obviously turned "Bushite", and Bush has turned Democrat (or always was). See previous entry.
The Republican establishment is for the Wall Street bailout, although the vast majority of Republicans oppose it. The Republican establishment was for the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill, even though the vast majority of Republicans opposed it.
The conservative establishment is for the Wall Street bailout bill, even though almost all conservative citizens are against it (on my side--with even my left leaning, feminist younger daughter being on my side--hick graduate of the University School of Law--this May--that she is, and hick new employee of a big law firm in that hick town of New York City). The conservative establishment (Fred Barnes, etc., this means you) was foor the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill. Almost all conservatives were against it. Rush Limbaugh spoke for conservatives in both cases. If you have guessed, maybe because I have told you, that I have no more respect for the conservative "establishment" than I have for the Republican "establishment", you are absolutely, 100$ right.
The big business establishment (mostly Democratic) is for the Wall Street bailout bill. The big business establishment was for the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill (cheap labor, you know, and a weapon against American workers).
Big Labor is ? (I am not sure, but they are sure not vocally against it, so I have to assume they are for it) the Wall Street bailout bill. Big Labor (amazing betrayal, but it is true) was for the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill.
The public is solidly, even overwhelmingly, against the Wall Street bailout bill. The public was solidly, even overwhelmingly, against the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill (with Obam as that silent partner, along with most Democrat politicians. When I referred to "most Democrats above, I meant Democrat politicians rather than Democrat rank an file).
Conclusion: We should take every member of the "establishment" in this country out and shoot them. Then we should start over with a new "establishment" "educated" by this treatment of the previous establishment. There is no more sure indication that a bill should be defeated than that every establishment we have in this country is for it. The only tw bills I have seen, of any importance, where this is true are the Wall Street bailout bill and the immigration bill. They also happen to be the two worst bills I have seen in my lifetime.
Okay. Let us stipulate that we can't shoot them (since most of the American people, other than hard core leftists like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack "World" Obama, are nicer than I am). However, surely we can exile them somewhere. Are Elba and St. Helena still available (where Napoleon was exiled)? Is Australia still taking undesirables, or would it mean war to try to send them there? How about outer space? Surely we can send them somewhere. We, the people, just can't take these arrogant, supercilious, ignorant, stupid morons any further. For our sanity, they have to go (yes, Fred Barnes, that still means you, and the "conservatives" like you).
If I start f fund to exile these people, do I have your support? No, I don't think we have to impeach President Bush to exile him. It will just be like he is on a long vacation somewhere. Obama and McCain would have to go, but we need two new candidates anyway. Palin might qualify to stay (might, if McAin has not corrupted her), but Biden would also have to go. The whole Senate would have to go, of course. Good Riddance. All you would have left of Republican lawmakers are in the House of Representatives. The mainstream media would all have to go, including Fox News. Good riddance again. Almost all of Wall Street and big business would have to go. No one would miss them. Leftists (of the Obama, Pelosi and REid type) would generally have to go, as they have become part of the establishment. Again, no one would miss them.
Trust me. It would be a much better country. Plus the rest of us might have a chance of remaining sane.
No comments:
Post a Comment