I have called these people the worst sanctimonious hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, and they are. I am talking about the leftists of the MoveOn.org kind and the mainstream media, who talk about the "Republican attack machine" while conducting the most viciuos personal attacks in the history of man.
Then, when their attacks fail, they start talking about how horrible it is that we aren't talking about the "issues". Here are the "issues" that the left wing media AND the left wing blogs have worried about since Sarah Palin was named the VP choice of John McCain.
1. Sarah Palin was not the mother of her Down's Syndrome baby, but that mother was really her 17 year old daughter. I HEARD the evil, despicable people at CNN (see entries over the last TEN days, and I strand behind every one of them, as CNN and MSNBC set out to DESTROY Sarah Palin for the Obama campaignl)--I HEARD those evil CNN people say that they actually sent people to Alaska to "investigate" this KOOK rumor/smear on the LEFT. Do you really think this is worryin g about the "issues"? What universe do you live in? If you believe this is about the "issues", then you are a left wing KOOK who believes that any alleged personal attack on a Republican is an "issue", while any attack on a Democrat (personal or not) is out of bounds. Larry King, Anderson Cooper, Kyra Phillips, Campbell Brown (whose father is a FELON convicted of LYING to the FBI), Soledad O'Brien (talking about Sarah Paln being a NEGLECTFUL MOTER, when O'Brien has four children under the age of 9), John Roberts, Wolf Blitzer, and the rest of CNN: I ACCUSE you of being sanctimonious hypocrites whose only interest has been in the "issue" of the PRESONAL DESTRUCTION of Sarah Palin. As I have conclusively shown over the past ten days, these people are EVIL SEXIST HYPOCRITES. For them to now talk about "issues" may indicate God does not really exist, or otherwise we would be hearing news stories about all of those massive thunderbolts raining down on CNN. MSNBC, of course, is merely an extension of MoveOn.org with the audience of a test pattern. That network is nothing more than an unending series of personal attacks on Palin and McCain--plus, before them, Hilary Clinton as they were obvious in support of Obama even then.
2. The McCain campaign was forced by the leftist personal attacks, and leftist media "interest" in supporting the KOOK LEFT, to put out a statement that Palin's 17 year old daughter was pregnant, and planned to marry the father. Unfazed at being shown to be the left wing KKOKS that they are, and being the left wing media supporters of such kooks, the left wing kooks promptly said that having a 17 year old daughter get pregnant disqualified the mother from being Vice President, as Obama pretended? to view this kind of evil politics with horror. CNN, and the people I NAMED above, almost had an orgasm over this one, in their zeal to personally attack Palin. They used ANY excuse to try to explain why a daughter's pregnancy had anything to do with being Vice President. That evil, sanctimonious hypocrite, Wolf Blitzer, said that it showed "hypocrisy" on the part of Sarah Palin. How STUPID does CNN think we are. I know it is not as STUPID as I KNOW they are---stupid, evil and hypocrites. As I said in an earlier entry, am I a HYPOICRITE because my DAGHTERS (now both about to be big time Eastern lawyers) failed to turn out like I wanted, since they have turned into feminists, mild leftists (at least until CNN and the rest may have revealed to them who leftists are), and (in the case of my younger daughter, married at 19, although not pregnant, pro-abortion). To say that a person is a HYPOCRITE because her children do not do everything the way she would prefer, Wolf, makes YOU the most dishonest, evil hypocrite I have ever seen, except for your colleagues at CNN. And then those same people at CNN, and on the left, will turn around and talk about how horrible it is that McCain attack Obama, instead of talking about serious "issues" like the economy YOU HYPOCRITES.
3. The pregnant daughter thing was not working, despite the attempt to by the leftist media (CNN, MSNBC, et. al. to float the idea that it made Palin a bad parent to "let" her 17 year old daughter get pregnant), the left then abandoned fifty years of feminism, and said that a mother of five can't handle that and be President of the United States. I am still waiting for the results of my complaint to Child Protective Services about Soledad O'Brien, who clearly has to be NEGLECTING her four children under 9 to pursue her own selfish career as a high profile "journalist" (lol on any CNN person being a "journalist"). THEN media people pretended to get OFFENDED that people were saying they were SEXIST, in an attempt to deflect criticism from Palin. CNN and the rest; YOU WERE SEXIST, under any definition the feminist movement has used i the last fifty years. Even more importantly, what did this have to do with the "issues". CNN and the rest you sexist leftists: YOU ARE VIL HYPOCRITES. How you can, with a straight face, start whining about the real "issues", like the economy, getting lost, after what you have done to try to personally destroy Sarah Palin, is so dishonest that every non-leftist kook person in the country realizes it. As for the MoveOn.org types, they have gone into evil hyperdrive in their personal attacks, so that even CNN cannot keep up with them (although they TRY to take every one seriously, while ignoring everything they can about Barack "World" Obama). Explain to me HOW the personal, sexist attacks on the MOTHERHOOD of Sarah Palin (DHISHONEST, even, because they consistently ignore that two of her children are essentially adults, and another old enough to help) are relevant to "serious" issues like the economy.
4. In this own book, the Presidential CANDIDATE of the democratic Party (yes, Obma) admitted using "hard durgs" in his young adult days. That did not deter the left, and the leftist media like US Weekly, from trying to make an "issue" out of the DUI arrest of Sarah Palin's SPOUSE (not even the candidate herself) 22 years ago, at the age of 22. US Weekly even left out the fact that the arrest occurred 22 years ago in the attempt to SMEAR Palin with her husband's arrest ("guilt by association" anyone). Now those "evil" Republicans have not made an issue of Obama's admitted use of hard drugs, indicating an "addictive" personality (a leftist smear term used as to both President Bush and Rush Limbaugh). But let me be as blunt as possible here: If illegal substance abuse is an ISSUE, then the only rational decision is to VOTE AGAINST OBAMA. He is the CANDIDATE with the history of SUBSTANTIAL illegal substance abuse. Comparing the CANDIDATE'S abuse of HARD DRUGS with a SPUSE'S one time abuse of alcohol is no comparison at all. Again, where is the concern on the left about the "real" issues? YOU SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITES.
End of Part I. Who knows how many parts are to come, as the examples are endless and continuing. As I have said, not only are the leftist blogs vicious KOOKS, but the mainstream med like CNN are using the lefitist blogs directly for source material. The EVIL people at CNN alone (Wolf Blitzer, Larry King, Anderson Cooper and the rest) will keep the parts of this entry coming. Just to bring the entry up to the present may take me a weeek.
P.S. Why have I included Obama in this 100% accurate analysis of the worst sanctimonious hypocrites ever to walk the Earth? It is because this stuff is being done by Obama supporters on behalf of Obama. Despite his pro foram statements, Obama has not done much to stop it. In fact, he is still playing up to MSNBC and real sleazeballs like Keith Olbermann. He has played up to, and supported, some of the worst lieft wing blogs, like the Daily Kos. Obama KNOWS what these people are going to do. He KNOWS he can safely act like he is above it, and let these people do his dirty work. Tha includes CNN and the rest of the mainstream media. Obama--unlike McCain--can RELY on the mainstream media to act as his AGENTS in the "politics of personal destruction". Nope. Sorry. I refuse to give Obama a pass on this. In this case, unless he does a LOT more than he has, he is a SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITE fully as much as they are. In fact, he may be WORSE, as he acts like Pontius Pilate washing his hands as if he has nothing to do with what is going on.