You have to understand how this developed to understand how truly EVIL the leftist, especially leftist media, reaction is in this matter. Remember, I have explained how people who are not fundamentally evil people can do evil things, such as Thomas Jefferson and slavery. I don't back off the word "evil" at all. But that is the context in which it is being used in this entry--the context of people doing EVIL tings, even if they are not fundamentally evil people.
This "story" started in the leftist "blogosphere". The rumor was that Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome baby was not hers, but her daughter's, and that there was a giant "cover-up" going on. What is your first reaction to that? It SHOULD be that leftist KOOKS--leftist HATERS who are on a lower, more despicable level than those haters who keep insisting that Obama is a Muslim--are trying to manumfacture a rumor on the same evil level as that rumor that President Bush arranged 9/11 (which those kooks insist was not an al-Qaida operation at all, but rather a government operation where BOMBS brought down the World Trade Center).
You and I would dismiss this rumor as representing the kook, hating fringe from which it came. Not CNN. You remember CNN. That is the network who IMMEDIATELY sent "news" people to Illinois to INVESTIGATE Barack "World" Obama when he first came to national prominence in Iowa, and when he was nominated. Investigate what, you ask? Resco, where there is MUCH more material than there is here that is MORE relevant to a Presidential race. William Ayers, where there is consderable evidence that Obama has MISREPRESENTED the closeness of his relationship with that Weather Underground terrorist. But those are actually substantive stories. CNN has not been INTERESTED in those stories. CNN, after all, is an EVIL network, only interested in lefitits, including KOOK leftist, stories against REPUBLICANS.
Therefore, the immediate--EVIL, and I stand entirely by the word--reaction of CNN was to send a TEAM to Alaska to "investigate' the internet "dirt" being thrown by leftist, hating KOOKS> For that alone, you should NEVER watch CNN again. They have again shown themselves to be totally biased, and an EVIL network (that is, a network willing to promote EVIL).
What happened? Sarah Palin felt compelled to disclose (was this the REAL goal of these leftist, kook bloggers, or are they just hating kooks?) that her 17 year old daughter is pregnant, but is going to marry the father and have the baby. Now one of my 17 or 18 year old first cousins actually had a baby (some 30 years ago now, and she is still married to the baby's father) that she had CONCEALED from even her parents. Did I think less of HER because of that? Nope. Did I think less of my uncle's FAMILY because of that? You know, I don't consider myself a very nice person--as I have said on this blog. Yet, that thought would never have occurred to me, just as it never occurred to me to think less of Sarah Palin and her family because of this. That leads to the inescapable conclusion, destructive as it is of my self-image: I am a NICER person than EVERYONE at CNN and MSNBC, and MANY at Fox News. Further, I am a NICER PERSON than almost every extreme leftist out there. This is getting bad. First, I discover I am a closet FEMINIST (see last week's entries), and now I discover I am NICER than all of those other people out there.
You guessed it. The CNN reaction to the REAL "news" (predictable, since they were willing to "investigate" the KOOK story with a view toward attacking Palin), was to attack Palin--to treat this as a NEGATIVE story about Palin. Barack "World" Obama, who--unlike CNN--may still claim to be nicer than I am--seemingly tried to warn his supporters away from this "story" by declaring this a personal family matter, and "off limits" to politics. I say "seemingly" because Obama KNOWS that he can "rely" upon the EVIL people supporting him, including those in the mainstream media, to engage in the "politics of personal destruction" for him. As I have often said, and gets PROVEN every day, the mainstream media is the PRIMARY agent of the "politics of personal destruction" in this country today.
Thus, FIRST you had Soledad O'Brien trying to lead the attack on behalf of CNN. You will remember Soledad O'Brien. She is the RACIST CNN reporter who called Reverend Wright's racist speech before the NAACP in Detroit a "great speech". if you have forgotten, that is the speech in which, among other things, Wright suggested that African-Americans and "white Europeans" learn DIFFERENTLY, and THINK differently--have different kinds of brains. Yep. That IS what the Ku Klux Klan has said all of these years. In short, Soledad is an Obama suck up, and not worthy of belief on any subject. Worse, SHE may actually think like these leftist kooks.
Soledad had a Democrat strategist and a Republican strategist on. They BOTH agreed with Barack "World Obama". Not good enough for the EVIL Soledad and the EVIL CNN. Soledad insisted upon trying too get the "guests" to go with the official leftist (Sally Quinn, of the Washington Post, suggested the same thing), CNN line that "family value conservatives" are likely to "turn on" Sarah Palin because of this. In other words, and I assure you I am 100% right on this, Soledad was trying to SUGGEST to "concerative" VOTERS: You should not vote for this woman (Palin) because her daughter's pregnancy shows that she does not really share your values."
Say what? Do CNN, mainstream "journalists", AND leftists REALLY think this badly of "family values" voters? Damn right they do. Got it the first time. That is exactly the CONDSCENDING way that these EVIL people think of "family values voters". Even Obama--the most condescending candidate I have ever seen in my lifetime--is not DUMB enough to be THIS condescending and manipulative. Soledad O'Brien was virtually screaaming out the message: "I regard the "Christian Right" as dumb hicks who are not nearly as tolerant as we enlightened leftists, who know that sex is no big deal."
Have you got the message as to what I think of Soledad O'Brien and CNN? I thought so. It gets worse.
Enter Wolf Blitzer, who made the mistake of discussing this with Bill Bennett at the same time he chose to talk to those ATTACK DOGS CNN had sent to Alaska to come up with dirt on Sarah Palin, based on these leftist blogs (obviously a major source for CNN). BAD mistake, Wolf. Bennett handed you, and CNN, your heads on a platter, and exposed you for the EVIL, biased people you are.
First, Wolf pretty much agreed with Bill Bennett that Obama was right (the universal, rational position of anyone but the self-appointed Obama attack dogs on CNN and the rest of the mainstream media). A 17 year old getting pregnant issomething that happens in the best of families in not only the 21st Century, but ever since about 1965 (oh, it HAPPENED before--just not with great frequency if the girl were not married). That is when Wolf stepped in it.
He brought in the female attack dog that CNN had sent to Alaska to SMEAR Sarah Palin. She obviously KNEW that was her job, and seemed to relish it. Even when Wolf tried to reign her in, she suggested that this story DEMANDED ANSERS, and seemed to be virtually demanding that Palin be LYNCHED for having a 17 year old daughter who got pregnant. I assure you that it was embarrassing (for poor Wolf--not for Sarah Palin). What "ansewers" you can "demand" about a 17 year old daughter being pregnant were unclear. What WAS clear was that the CNN report was designed to TRASH Sarah Palin.
Remember, Bill Bennett was still THERE. He CALLED Wolf Blitzer on the EVIL (without using that word) of this kind of unfair, advocacy "journalism". Poor Wolf had NO defense. It was like the FIRST American "Dream Team" basketball team at the Olympics.
However, did Wolf apologize for the disgraceful report? Dream on. That is what he SHOULD have done. But what he DID was start blathering on about how it was a legitimate issue that Sarah Palin supported "abstinence only" sex education, and that this story raised legitimate "qeustions" about her "judgment"--demanded ANSERS, in the words of that truly disgraceful female reporter. Wolf, isn't it great how FAST you went over to the DARK SIDE, after agreeing that this was not a significant story as to the qualifications of Sarah Palin to be Vice President.
CNN, Wolf Blitzer, Soledad O'Brien, Planned Parenthood, and extreme leftists in general are INTOLERANT people. They are MORE intolerant than the most narrow minded "family values" conservative who ever lived. Further, they are DISHONES> They don't CARE about "family values conservatives". They have CONTEMPT for "family values conservatives". They are CONDESCESCENDING to "family values conservatives". But they want to DECEIVE family value conservatives into voting the way CNN wants them to vote, or into not voting at all.
Again, Bill Beennett made poor Wolf look like the Darth Vader instant convert he was. Bennett told Wolf that it is WRONG, as Obama suggested, to USE a SPECIFIC 17 year old girl to try to advance your POLITICAL AGENDA. It is an EVIL thing. Does the pregnancy of ONE 17 year old girl, which we don't know anything about, say anything one way or the other about sex education? Don't be sill (I will address HOW silly in a later entry). Logically, to try to use an individual case to prove a general principle is a logical FALLCAY. What you are really trying to do is exactly what Obama said you should not do: To USE this 17 year old girl's personal choices POLITICALLY against her mother. If you do not realize that, then you are not only EVIL (along with Wolf Blitzer and CNN), but you are STUPID.
No comments:
Post a Comment