Thursday, June 11, 2009

Holocaust, "Hate Crimes, and Hypocrisy, Inc: President Obama to Blame Or Will Limbaugh Be Framed?

Yes, this entry is about the killing yesterday of a security guard at that Holocaust museum, and the incredible--if predictablel--mainstream media reaction to it.


Who is committing MOST of the "hate crimes" int eh world today? Right. Islamic extremists. Bombings in Pakistan and elsewhere. Killings in the U.S. (pretty much ignored by the mainstream media, although they could not really ignore 9/11--forget it, syes, but not ignore it). and elsewhere. Riots over cartoons or because of encouragement from the AMERICAN media (encuraging Islamic "hate crimes", as Newsweek did with that story about the American guard supposedly--turns out story false--urinating on the Koran at Gitmo). But the left, and the mainstream media (same redundancy, as usual), have made a point of saying that all Muslims cannot be blamed for the reaction of a few.


Who is encouraging HATE against Jews in the world, to the point that they are actually reacting a lot of people? Well, there is President Obama, who got all of that publicity for a speech in which he BLAMED ISRAEL (Jews) for their "occupation" of Arab lands, and "humiliation" of Muslims living under that "occupation. Was PRESIDENT OBAMA responsible for the killing of the security guard at the Holocaust museum? Horrors, skip, you can't say THAT? Wrong. I just did. I agree it is a stretch, but no more a stretch than the media, and the Obama Administration, trying to blame the ENTRIE "right", including Rush Limbaugh, for "hate crimes". Yes, this fits right into the theme of the previous entry abut the incredible hypocrisy of the left. There are no more virulent HATERS (not to mention racists and religious bigots) on this planet than in the left, and yet they act like hate is being spred in the world only by "right wing" haters.


Okay, you rightly reject the idea that President Obama is really to blam for the killing at the Holocaust museum, even if the case against him is BETTER than the case is against Rush Limbaugh being responsible for the "hate crimes" hes is accused of encouraging. After all, it is hard to avoid the implication that this Holocaust museum would not have happpened if President Obama had not made that Mideast trip, and followed it up with a trip to death camps in Germany (as if it took Obama to veriry that the Holocaust actually occurred). But how much "white supremacist" hate is WIDELY pubicized and distributed int the world? Except when a crime like this occurs, do you hear a lot about what neo-Nazis and white supremacists are saying? Of course not. They are FRINGE NUTS. They exist int their own little hate sphere on the internet--a much lesser hate sphere than the LEFTIST HATERS whose blogs are filled with venom). They have NO real outlet for distributing their message of hate. Sure, these fringe nuts might commit isolated "hate crimes", like the killing at that Holocaust museum, but they are hardly in a positioin of spreading their hate very widely.


Who is in such a position? Well, the leftist haters are. See yesterday's blog entry. They are MUCH more pervasive on the internet, and in our society, than the neo-Nazi nuts. Then there are the Islamic extremists, who control entire COUNTRIES spreading a message of hate. That includes Ahmadinejad, President of Iran, who has denied that the Holoscaust even occurred. And his message has been spread not only by Mulsims throughout the world, in their media and moosques, but by our mainstream media (not exactly with approval, but with less extensive condemnation that with--say--Rush Limbuagh). Yes, I include SAUDI ARABIA in those extreme Islamic countries TEACHING a message of hate. The haters on the left AGREED with me on that, so long as it could be used against President Bush (his alleged Saudi connections). However, leftists are HPOCRITES as much as they are haters, and thus you now have President Bush PANDERING to Saudi Arabia, and the leftist criticism of the Saudis has become much muted. There remains no question that Ilsamic extremists are TEACHING hate throughout the owrld--not in every mosque, but in way too many mosques and schools.


What was the reaction I heard on CBS radio news this morning to this HOlocaust killing? Well, you KNEW it was not to blame President Obama. However, the CBS reaction was just as incredible, if you know these people. They did everything but blame Rush Limbaugh, and I am sure many in the leftist media will get around to that. Of course, the ida that this killer was a "white supremacist" was played up, along with his connection with anti-semitic groups (message to CBS: The LARGEST anti-semitic group in the world, BY FAR, is extreme Islam). .But that wsa just the beginning.


I could not make this stuff up. The brief CBS News rado story this morning USED the Holocaust museum killing as a springboard to start talking about "hate crimes" being up in the U.S. ONe of the "explanatiions" for this (CBS style) is anger over President Obama being the first balck (sort of) President. This was all in a one minute report. See what I mean about how they were well on their way to blaming Rush LImbaugh for spreading "right wing" hate against President Obama, even though Rush Limbaugh is a MUCH STRONGER supporter of Israel (along iwth most "right wingers", including me) than President Obama. So is it really more plausible to blame Rush Limbaugh for this kind of hagte, or President Obama (albeit insane to "blame" either of them).


Nope. the mainstream media and left in this country is HYPOCRISY Inc. They refuse to even risk "guilt by association" as to smearing all Muslims with the hate crimes of some Islamic extremists, despite the masive hate teaching by too many Islamic extrmists in the world. But they are willing to take an isolated killing in another country and suggest that it reflects GeNERAL hatred in the world, AND the USA, against blacks and Jews--a RISING hatred--not by Islamic extremists but by those really dangerous "right wingers" that oppose Obama. This fits right in witht he Obama Administration issuing that report to law enforcement suggesting that attending an anti-Obama "tea party" made you more of a "danger" to homeland security than being an Islamic extemist, or even terrorist.


You may think I am exaggerating, but I am not. This is exactly the message that CBS meant to put out. Is an islolated, neo-Nazi killing in another country have ANYTHING to do with race hatred "rising" because of President Obama? Nope. For these people in the mainstream media, and on the left, it is ALL about race (racists that they are). President Obama becoming President Obama is not a sign, to THEM, that we are PAST racism--except for a few fringe nuts (ignoring the massive racism on the LEFT). President Obama is a signal to these peole that we need to wallow even MORE in race as the defining characteristic of people, along with their atttitude toward wallowing in racial guilt. These people on the left do not know HOW to treat people as indiviudals, and "guit by association" (even RACIIAL guit by association) is basically the main rationale of thieir entire philosophy of life--so long as it is "guilt by association" APRROVED by leftists.


Anti-violence, pro-life groups oppose killing of all kinds? So what. They are sitll "responsible" for killings of abortion doctors because of their "encouragement" of "hate". Meanwhile, Islamic extremists are TEACHING hate around the world, and leftists spewing it evwhere, but we must not engage in "guit by association there!!!


I have had it with these people (mainstream media and leftists in general). They are, indeed, the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth on two legns--and more sanctimonious than the fictional Elmer Gantry ever was. I will say it flatly: They are despicable human beings. Does that mean I am "encouraging "hate crimes" against hemm? Well, if you are a leftist, it probably does mean that to you.


Do I excuse a "white supremacist" killing a person at a Holocaust museum. Nope. EXECUTE HIM. To use President Bush's best lie ever (virtually the only good one): "What do you want me to do. I can only execute them once". President Bush was, of course, answering the questioin about why a heinous killing of a black person in Texas did not cuase him to support more "hate crime" legislation. The problem is not "contemning" the killing. The problem is the USING of this kind of killing as a springboard, by CBS and the rest, to ENCOURAGE racial hatred in this country by making it ALL baout race.


Coming up is a blog entry giving you a review of the older movie, with Robert Mithcum, called "Man in the Middle". I will use that movie to ask an interesting question: Are ALL "hate crimes" of the Nazi type PRROF that the person committing the crime is not guilty by reason of insanity? In other words, should everyone found to have committed a "hate crime" be automatically declared "innocent" by reason of insanity? Nope. That is not me. I say, along with Preisdnet Bush, EXECUTE the murderors, along with other murderors. But leftist hypocrites tie themselves in knots because on their hypocrisy and leftist inconsistency. Stay tuned for that entry sometime in the next week. You get these things nowhere else. ............Okya. I HEARD that. The person who said "Thank God" is going to be the victim of a "hate crime".

No comments: