This blog and Bill Maher--very different kinds of agnostics, as Maher is an anti-religious, intolerant bigot, but sharing an ability to tell a religiouis person when we see one--both agree that President Obama is NOT a Christian, but a "secular humanist" (leftist ideology being his religion). Now AT&T and Yahoo, by means of an article from the BIGOTS of the despicable AP, have agreed with Bill Maher and I taht Obama is not a Christian, or at least that such is the "hot issue" out there as Obama is deflected away from his supposed concentration on "jobs". Here is the despicable AP/AT&T/Yahoo headline:
"A hot issue on the campaign trail: thwology."
Hacker Boy (again hacking into this despicable blog in the intereest of truth, while still denying the charge by Skip that I am connected with Rupert Murdoch and/or the unfair and unbalanced network): "Skip. You are incorrigible. You know that the AP was not talking about OBAMA. If the AP refused to even make an issue out of Reverend Wright, Obama's pastor for 20 years, you KMNOW that the AP is not presently gonig to look into Obama's theology. The AP is really mainly referring to Rick Perry--still referring back to taht "prayer meeting" of more than a month ago. Now I agree that only the epeople of the AP could call this a hot issue of 'theology'. But these are not the brightest bulbs in the drawer, and tkhey really are driven by agenda. It is clearly the AP that wants to deflect Perry and tghe Republicans off on "theology'. However, that does not excuse you for suggesting that AT&T and Yahoo have joined you and Maher in asserting that Obama is not a Christian>'
Skip: You can't get anything past Hacker Boy. However, Rick Perry is out there talking about JOBS in Texas. Who is talking aobut "theology" and "social issues"? Right. The anti-Christian BIGOTS of CNN and the AP (as featured on the AT&T/Yahoo internet default page). It is th epeople of the mainstream meida who want to talk about THEOLOGY (whatever that means). Is Rick Perry really out thre arguing that he should be electred President because he belongs to the One True Church? Not on our life. That is a BIGOTED conceit--a LIE--for the anti-Christian bigots of the AP.
Now has President Obama, and the Democrats, appeared beforfe religious groups to push their Christian bonaifdes? Sure. I stand by the headline. Given that Obama has appeared before "faith based" groups , and has asserted a false Christian faith that motivates him, what is the only reasonable conclustion when you say that Rick Perry is somehow bringing "theology" into politics? Right. You are saying; the AP is saying, and AT&T?Yahoo are saying that OBAMA IS NOT REALLY A CHRISTIAN. In other words, the mainstream media doees not really believe tghat Obama really believes in any religion. That is exactly waht Bill Maher and I have said, and it is true. And if we are going to argue "theology" in thi spolical campaign, as the AP and mainstream media WANT to do (but only for Repuboicans), then I am going to argue the "theology" of Barack Obama. The man is a hypocrite. Yep. I have said that I believe it is an evil thing to start arguing the DETAILS of religious beliefs as part of a political campaign But I am not a Christian I do not turn the other cheek. Therefore, if the epole of the AP and the ret of the mainstream media are going to spread EVIL by making erligion should a "hot isssue" (only in their obsessed, propaganda minds), then I am going to make Repsdient Obaama's religious hypocrisy an ISSUE all of tghe way to November.
Waht did the EVIL BIGOTS of the AP say about Perry? They said that Perry attended a prayer meeting for epople who actually BELEVED in a particular religion (not necessariy, by the way, the same religion, although you can say it was generally an evangelical group). What the AP said was that Perry did a "rare" thing: fully embracing ONE religion. What the AP wanted Perry to do, of course, was what people like Obama do--people who do NOT actually believe in any erligion. What the AP wants, on pain of the mainstream media trying to destroy a candidate, if for al lpolitical candidates to make clear that they do NOT eblieve in any particular religion. You are supposed to be "ecumencial", and "pray" to some "commmon", bipartisan God of ALL of the people That is absurfd, if you really BELIEVEW in your religion. The whole idea of having a religion is that you are supposed to BELIEVE in it. The AP, and AT&T/Yahoo, clearly do not think Obama realy believes in any particular religion (for good reason, since he does not).
Yes, I know that the AP is trying to suggest that Perry EXCLUDED oterh religions, and sent the meassage that ONLY his religioni has any claim to validity. That is simply a BIGOTED LIE. It is not true. The AP made it up. I say that as a person who does nto especailly like Perry. This mainstream media/lefitst idea that politicians should not HAVE a religion--a particular religion--is an EVIL assertion. There is nothing wrong with a politician BELIEVEING in something.--whetgher it is a particular religon or "secular humanism. What is wrong is the idea that religion has to be HIDDEN behind closed doors, rather than refrenced in pubilc. President Lincoln sent out a proclamation after teh Union victories at Vicksburg and Gettysburg crediting GOD for those victories. Indeed, RELIGIOIN was very much behind the crusade agaisnt slavery. Union soliders went to war singing: "Mine eys have seen the glory of the coming of tghe Lord>' The AP LIES when it sayis that American "tradition" abhors religion having any influence on pubic life, or the mind of a politician.
What is WRONG is to ARGUE RELIGION as part of politics. There is nothing wrong with "embracing" a particular religoin as the one in whihc YOU want to pary. Nope. It does not matter if you are a leader of ALL of the people. Does that mean you can't support the Green Bay Packers, if you are from Wisconsin, or the Dalas Cowboys in Texas? No, religion is NOT different. If you really believe in a religoin, as the maisnteam media and Obama do not, then you should be willing to ACT LIKE YOU ACTUALY BELIEVE. No, that does NOT mean forcing other people to pray your way, or telling the public that ONLY oyour religioin should be publicly recognized as having any possible merit. Rick Perry has never done that, and no sane politician would. RickPerry, like any other candidate, haS to run on POLICY. whehter hiis policy positions arise, in part, out of his religiuos beliefs is IRRELEVANT. Doubt me? Then you are NOT really a Christian. The very essence of the Christian religion is that ti it should affect your life. Why else do you say you are a Chrisitan? But you can't ARGUE thoeloogy, unless you are a bigot from the AP. You have to ARGUE LPOLICY.
To put it another way is it only people who do NOT blieve in God (like Obama) who have a "right" to a postioin on abortion? Nope. That is an EVIL assertion---simply trying to keep from arguing the merits of your policy position No none should be able to get away with arguing against abortion jsut because "God says it is bad". However, if your overally religious beliefs lead you to the conclusion that abortion and infanticide are the same thing, jsut as they lead you to the conclusioin that slavery and murder are wrong, then you are perfectly entitled to POLITICALLY advocate your beliefs. It is irrelevant that your religion is part of what forms your entire belief slystem. It is not more "inappropriate" to argue POLICY coming from a position of a religious person (but not arguing on that basis) than it is to argue POLICY coming from a position of "seular humanism". To say otehrwise is anti-religious BIGOTRY (see Bill Maher).
Now si Rick Perry deliberately highlighting his relibious beliefs to appeal to certain Republican primary/caucus votters? Of course. So what. Obmaa DID THE SAME THING, and still does it whenvever he feels he needs to assert (falsely) that he is a Chrisitan. This is politics. It is not me that is naive. It is the AP and mainstream media. Except. They are not naive. They are EIVL LPROPAGANDISTS: the worst hypocrites who have ever walked the Earth, on two legs or fourt.
Rick Perry is running on Texas, and jobs. His "reigioius" event was merely atypical political attempt to impress certain voters that he actually believes in something. I think he DOES believe in his religion more than Obama, but I frankly don't know ow much Perry has not been an especailly outspoken religious conservative in the past. But this has nothing to do with "theology". It is the AP that wants to ARGUE religioni, as the AP did in 2008 when it did that EVIL artilcle about how Romney's great grandfather was a POLYGAMIST (whyile failing to investigate Obama's polygamist ancstors on his father's side).
Nope . The mainstream media agrees with Maher and me that Obama is not a Christian. Furtehr, they are anti-Christian bigots who WANT to make "religon" a part of political campaigns. In fact, CNN, the AP, and the rest of the mainstream meida want you to SELL OUT your country. They are saying that those Republicans MIGHT be worth voting for, except for their absurd "postiioins' on "social issues' induced by their religion. In other words, the mainstream media is telling you that you should ignore the IMPORTANT things like JOBS in faovr of the UNEMPORTANT "social issues". This is, of course, because Obama has NO CASE n the important issues.
Yep Dishonest Jack Cafferty, as this blgo haS shown before, has sated this positoin clearly: Repbulicans can never get the ovters of reasonable people as long as lthey have these positions onn these social issues, even if it means thet the cuntry goes down the tubes . Okay, he did not quite say it that way, but almost.
No. If this is all Rick Perry has to worry about--the anti-Christian bigots of the mainstream media trying to concentrate on his "religioni" rather than his jobs message--then Perry might as well be sworn in as next President of the United States right now. It is the MAINSTEREAM MEIDA which is OBSESSED with social issues--not most Repubicans. The elction will not turn on those issues, right as conservatives are on those issues.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment