Wolf Blitzer: Liar on the Liar Network

Was there a major "gaffe" at the Republican debate last night? Yes, there was. No, it was NOT any of the Republican candidates. Sure, many of the candidates--well, alll of them, since that is the nature of politics--said things with which people might disagree. But there was no major gaffe from the DANDIDATES, in the highest qulaity debate yet--because of the quality of the Tea Party QUESIOINS (which should shame "journalists", except that they have no shame). And it was a "journalists" who made the major gaffe: the moderator, Wolf Blitzer. Yep. Liar Blitzer, as wyou would expect from a "journalists" of The Liar Network, told an outright, obvious LIE (along with several minor gaffes).


Wolf Blitzer (posing his own, question, as was obvious from the lack of quality of the question and its partisan hack nature, even if I were not telling youi that Blitzer identified it as his own question): "Rick Perry has called for Ben Bernanke to be tried for treason. Do you agree with that?"


Nope. The questioni was a LIE, and Wolf Bitzer (liar) knows it. This was the mainstream media "narrative" on Rick Perry's commments on Ben Bernanke, and it always was a LIE. No, this is NOT a matter of opinion. Rick Perry never accused Ben Bernanke of the crime of "treason". If I were to say that it was "treasonous" for Ron Paul to suggest, as he has consistently doone, that the USA is to BLAME for 9/11 because we won't mind our own business, would I really be saying that Ron Paul should be go to TRIAL for treason, or that Ron Paul has committted the CRIME of treason. Of course not. That would be a slilly way to interepret such a FIGURATIVE statement on my part. I would cllearly be accusing Paul of MORAL treason, and not of LEGAL treson. "Treason" has a legal meaning, and then it has a non-legal meaning. That is especially true of the variation of the word represented by "treasonous". Yes, the mainstream media is composed of LIARS, and they deliberately lied on this one. They deliberately tried to confuse the LEGAL meaning of treason with the non-legal meaning. Wolf Blitzer, however, is not only a LYING "journalist", but he is BONE DEEP STUPID. Thus, Blitzer was not satisfied with simply trying to "suggest" that Rick Perry had accused Ben Bernanke of legal "treason". Blitzer had to make it inot a very explicit LIE, without even any ambiguity. What Rick Perrry did NOT do was say, or suggest in any way, that Bene Bernanke should be TRIED for the crime of treason. That is the kind of gaffe that wold get a CANDIDATE driven from a political race, unless that candidate were named "Barack Obama", and it is the kind of gafffe that SHOIULD get lying political hack Blitzer drvien out of "journalism". Of course, if all such people left CNN, there would not be enough warm bodies left to keep the lights on for those people inadvertently tuning their TV to CNN (no one does it deliberately, as the ratings show).



By the way (for you "journalists" out there), I did NOT calll Ron Paul "treasonous", , even figuratively speaking, although I think you can farily say that I suggested that it would be an understandable word to use in connection with Paul's unique, isolatioinist view of our actions in the world. Ron Pual is Ron Paul, which is why so many people love him, and why he will not be President. He is consistent on his principles to the bitter end, even when he knows taht many people will thereby believe that he is siding with the terrorists against his own country. I even went so far yesterday as to suggest I might endorse Ron Paul for President, The debate showed why I cannot do that, However, it remains true that I would VOTGE for Ron Paul for President against Barack Obama, which I still think is doubtful as to whatever person will be the actual Repuiblican nominee.


Thus, we again established last evening that Wolf Blitzer is a liar, on The Liar Network. That may not be of much use to you in deciding upon who to vote for President, but all information has some value (as distinct from what the mainstream media puts out, which is not informatin at all--since they are not INTERESTED in actual information).


Doubt me? Never do taht. I hae not even emphasized the part that makes Blitzer's LIE so very obvious, and stupid. Perry not only did ot say that Bernanke should be 'tried for treason". Perry did not even say that Bernanke was "treasonous"---in any meaning of the word. What Perry said was that what Bernake has done, as Fed chairman, is "almost treasonous" (a sentiment with which I agree). Despite the liears of the mainstream media, who immediately went off describing the CRIME of "treason", no one has eVER been charged with the "crime" of "almost treason".



P.S. No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight).