Gloria Borger: Dishonest Political Hack on The Liar Network

Yes, I made the mistake of just listening to 30 seconds of Gloria Borgre on CANN. The people of CNN are ALL dishonest poitical hacks. And Gloria Borger is one of the wort on CN. That makes Gloria Borger one of the worst, most partisan and dishonest, political hacks who has ever existed on elevison.


What is the present PARTISAN HACK "storyline" of Gloria Borger? It is that REPUBICANS are at a "low" ebb" because the popularity of Congress is so low. CNN just keeps proving itself full of the worst, most dishoenst hypocrites who have ever walked the Earth, on two legs or four. As stated, Gloria Borger is the worst of the worst.


Remember George W. Bush? You do? CNN does not. CNN--hypocrites all--especaily does not remember how it IGNORED that there were people MORE LUNPOPULAR than George W. Bush. Who? Nancy Pelosi. Harry Reid. fNo, Gloria Borger, you LIE when you suggest that "Congress" equates to "REPUBLICANS". The DEMOCRATS in Conmgress are just as unpopular. Further, they HAVWE been this unpopular, dating back to when George W. Bush was President. CNN--hypocrites all--pretty much ignored that DEMOCRATS in Congress were just as unpoopular as George W. Buish--or even more so.


Why did it not help John McCain that Democrats in Congress were just as HATED as George W. Bush? Well, Gloria Borger--dishoenst political hack that she is--will not tell you. I will. THE CONOMY. Yes, you will remember that McCain was TIED with Obama when the economy COLLAPSED (what I call the BERNANKE FAILURE--see the previoius article). From that point forward, McCain had no chance. What is similar about thhe 2012 election? Is it that Congress is so "unpopular". No, Gloria Borger, only a dishoenst person like yourself would think that way. What is similar is the TERRILBVE economic times. Obama CANNOT WIN if the economy stays this bad. No. It does not matter what Congress does. It does not matter how "unpopular" Congress becomes. OBAMA CANNOT WIN. you want to bet, Gloria--dishonest political hack that you are?


Yes, Gloria Borger even raised that onld chestnut about Harry Truman running against the "d nothing" Congress. Barack Obama is no Harry Truman. I was alive when Harry Truman was elected lPresident--barely--n 1948. Okay, I was one year old, and hardly imnvolved in politics. Hoewver, I have been folowing politics since Eisenhnower. NO President since Truman has gotten away with running against Congress. Gloria Borger, dishoenst political hack, did not mention that. Furthe, SHE has not been around since Truman. It is a CONCEIT--a partisan ply-for Borger to talk about Harry Truman as if she knew him. Harry Truman was the very OPPOSITE of Barack Obama. While Barack Obama blames everone else, Harry Truman COINED the phrase: The buck stops here. Harry Truman had the kind of personaithy and honesty that allowed him to pull off the almost impossible. Obama has no such thing.


Yes, the dishonest political hacks at CNN--with Gloria Borger as head hack and Wolf Blitzer as her mentally challegned sidekick--have already develooped their "storyline" AHEAD of the President's speech. Borger almost gleefuly announced that the President was kicking off his campaign for reelection against CONGRESS, and was clear that she and CNN are on board with the campaign. Yes, the "storyline" is hat Obama is CHALLENGING Congress to either adopt his plan or come up with one of its own . Boprger--partisan political hack--ignores that Repubicans HAVE come up with multiple plans of their own, REJECTED by Obama. Stop regulations. Reduce taxes. And so on. Look at Romney's "59 point" plan. What Borger--partisan political hack--and CNN mean is that Repubicans will not come up with a GOVERNMENT spending plan. I actually think Borger is too optimistic on this. I am araid Repubilcans are going to BETRAY the very Tea Party people who elected lthe idiots. Obama has FAILED with every "stimulus", including the very SAME things he is gong to propose tonight--arnother thing not mentioned by political hack Borger. Why should people believe that the same old "siimulus" will work this time, when it has already FAILED time and time again. Furhter, Republicans say that "stimulus" gimmickss are lthe WRONG way to go How can they say that, and then BETRAY peopl like me by going along with AnY Obama "stimulus" gimmicsks that INCREASE the debt? That will only cause Congress to become more unpopular.


Nope. Gloria Borger is a dishonest political hack on The Liar Network. Obama simply CANNOT get away with running agsint Congress, when Obama's party completely controlled Congress for the first two years of his Presidency and FAILED to improve things. ONow Obama is going to suggest MORE OF THE SAME. Gloria Borger does nto explain how this can possibly work, becasue she can't. What she is remains a dhishonest political hack, and that is all she will ever be.


I have already told you the real danger for Repubicans, although it is not a very real danger so long as the economy remains this bad: BETRAYAL. People like me remain ready and willing to ABANDON the Repuboican Party. Thbat will not matter if OIbama continues down this losing road, and the econmy remains this bad. Ultimately it will matter. That is the REAL--non-political hack--meaning of the 54% of the peoiple who want to vote against ALL OF THE ABOVE (vote to throw ALL of the bums out). Republicans should never get the idea that people LIKE them.. we DO NOT. Republican politicians: WE DESPISE YOU--mainly because we don't believe that any of you have any lpriniciples at all. Okay, that is maybe an exaggeration. There are lprobably 10 or 20 of you with principles. But the generalization otherwise applies, even to the supposed "Tea Party" politicans. If yo do not show that this distrust is not merited, then you are part of a DEAD party walking (no matter whether you win the next election or not).


Can Democrats ever be part of a dead party walking? Only if they keep winning elections. Demorats do very BADLY in pwoer. However, there is a certain element of the population which wants to be TAKEN CARE OF by the goverfnment. That element--unlike the Repubican "no princiiple" business message--will always be with us. Thus, the Repubican Party CAN become a dead party walking. It is not so easy for the Democratic Party to become that, because that lefitst lelement that dominates the party DOES have a message: Let government take care of you. That message ALWAYS will appeal to some peole, and really goes way out of favor mainly when the STUIDITY of that approach to government becomes obvious. That is usually when leftist Democrats are in POWER: Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Careter and Barack Obama.