For awhile this morning, the FEATURED picture story on my AT&T default page (original source not worth figuring out, although apparently NOT the AP) was that: "White House mixes up Wyoming and Colorado on map."
Now I understand that the "White House" is not exactly the sa me as Obama. But I ask yo9u. Who is it that once said there are 57 states? Right. Obama. The White House is clearly getting its signals from the top. And people translate the "White House" as being the President's responsibility (for good reason).
Important? Of coure not. So the White House (seemingly a logt of people wuld be involved) does not know where Wyoming and Colorado should be on the map, or how the map of the U.S. should look. By the way, did Obama USE the map without recognizing the error? Not, tyupically, clear from the first part oft he story (as far as I fet it worth the effort, with jmy eyesight). Just like Miechele Bachmann mixing up where the first battle of the Revolutionary War was fought (New Hampshire or Massachusetts?), this is UNIMPORTANT. I mean really unimportant. Notice, however, that if it wERE Michelle Bachmann, it would be used as an exmple of how she gets things wrong. Meanwhile, the HYPOCRITES (dishonest ones) of the mmainstream media do NOT go through a list of Obama mistakes when another error appears (including misquoting the Declaration of Independence to omit "by their Creator").
Tht is what confuses me a little bit here. Yes, the unfair and unbalanced network might metntion this "White House" mistake. But featured on AT&T//Yahoo? Is this blog again having an effect? Even Monday's blog article playing the "race card" with regard to Obama was a two edged sword. It just did nt have an air of the WORSHIP that used to be in every story about Obama. I would say this does NOT represent a trend of "objectivity", but it is barely possible that the media is becoming embarrasssed about how much CONTEMPT everyone has for them and their dishonest hypocrisy.
No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment