Questions Piers Morgan, dishonest hypocrite, will never ask of Barak Obama, and which willl not be asked by CNN or anyone else in the mainstream media:
1. Do you believe homosexuality is a sin? If the Bible says homosexuality is a sin, do you disagree with the Bible? If God says homosexual conduct is a sin, do you disagree with God?
2. Why do you think that homosexual marriage has never been recognized, for all of the thousands of years of human histtory before essentailly this century, even though polygamy and incest have been recognized as acceptable marriages in many times and places? (Editor's note: Cleopatra married her brother, as was customary for Egyptian royalty, and others).
3. How can you call yourself a Chirstian and still support legal abortion on demand up to th emoment of birth?
4. Do you understand that a ninth month fetus is SCIENTIFICALLY a "higher" form of life than an 8th month premature baby? Why do you think that cutting the umbilical cord creates a soul that did not previously exist? Isn't that absurd? If a Christian does not KNOW when a soul is created in a human body, with no reason to believe that a doctor injects the soul when he cuts the umbilical cord, how can you be a Christian and support abortion on demand. Are you telling me that you DON'T KNOW whehter you are approving the killing of a crature with a soul, but that yoiu are willing to risk the wrath of God because abortioin on demand is so important to you? How can you b e a Christian and take that attitude?
5. Do you favor legal infanticide in cases of rape and incest?
6. Do you favor legal abortion for the reason that the fetus is a GIRL? So there are SOME reasons you think are wrong for abortioin, but not--for example--the desire to be free to go out and party like Casey Anthony?
7. Do you really believe that the Theory of Evolultion FULLY explains how life on Earth was created from inanimate chemicals, and then devleoped into intelligent human beings (and other higher animals) by means of totally RANDOM mutation? Since most random mutations are harmful, are there not some problmes with this (even over a LONG period of time)?
8. Do you believe in premarital sex?
9. Is your Christianity the source of your public policy positions? Do you understand that the Christian religion presupposes that your religioni determines what kind of person you are, and gudes you in all things?
10. Do you believe that people wo do not accept Jesus Christ will go to Hell? Do you understand that to be one of the core beliefs of almost all Christian religions?
11. Do you believe Muslims will go to Hel if they do not accept Christ?
12. Do you understand why Bill Maher has said you are not really a Christian, but a secular humanist?
Enouh. I can keep this up FOREVER, and never run out of fquestions that Barack Obama will NOT be asked, because the members of the mainstream media are DISHONEST HYPOCRITES. No, they are not dishonest hypocrites because they think these questions are inappropriate for Barack Obama. They are dishoenst hypocrites because they think that these questons are APPROPRIATE for Republicans. Thus, CNNN believes it is "appropriate" to ask Mike Huckabee if he believes that the Bible is the literal Word of God. Does Barack Obama--who SAYS he is a Christian, even though Bill Maher and I do not believe it--believe that the Bible is the literal Word of God? We will never know, will we? "60 Minutes" actually asked Mitt Romney (in the 2008 campaign, as ws the Huckabee question) whether he had engaged in premarital sex with his wife (refacing the question with the idea that Mormons really MEAN it when they say premarital sex is wrong, while Crhistians have generally got over that weird idea that God may mean what He said--even if our modern society believes that God was wrong). Message to CBS and "60 Minutes": You are EVIL people spreading EVIL (that "problem of evil again, as to how God can allow evil like this to exist).
Yes. I am getting to Piers Morgan, and the weird, compulsive obsession that CNN has with "gay issues" as the most important issues facing this country today. Dishonest Jack Cafferty actually said on CNN that no reasonable person could vote for a Republican so long as Republicans maintain their present positions on social issues, even if it would save the country. Isn't it great how CNN would SELL OUT the country becuase it believes that homosexual "rights" are mroe improtant than whether you have a job? Than whether HOMOSEXXUALS have jobs? Dishonest Jack forever EARNED his name by saying it was REPUBICANS who were putting too much emphasis on "social issues", when it is CNN which regards homosexual "issues" as the MOST IMPORTANT issues facing this country (more imporatnt than jobs, the economy, terrorism, or anything else).
Yetp. This is where Piers Morgan comes in. The partisan political hack, and dishonest hypocrite, interviewe Rick Santorum on his CNN program. What was the most extensive part of the interview? Jobs? Don't be silly. This is PIERS MORGAN, partisan, political, CNN hack The economy? Ditto. Terrorism? Ditto. the debt? Ditto. The deficit? Ditto. Piers Morgan gave Santorum queston after queston abut his positon on homosexual conduct, and "rights" of homosexuals. That is what Piers Morgan and CNN--The Gay and anti-Christian Network--perceive as the MOST IMPORTANT issues in the country. Merely asking these questions of course, as CNN did during that debate where Dishonest Jack Cafferty did not like the answers, represents an ATTACK on a Republican. The idea of merely ASKING these questions (the answer not mattering) is to suggest that Repubican candidates are "religious nuts". Ask yourself how long President Obama would survive if he were constantly asked: "How can you say your are a Christian if............?" Or even: Are you really a Christian?
The questons are INSULTING. Piers Morgan is INSULTING to the human race. He is a SMARMY,m partisan hack who should not have a public access program in Mt. Ida, Arkansas. But that is true of EVERYONE on CNN (althoung not all of them--aside from the ultra-smarmy Anderson Cooper--are a slimy and smarmy as Piers Morgan). Nope. Piers Morgan is an EVIL man spreading EVIL--laong with the rest of the people on CNN.
No, these constant questons on RELIGON ar EVIL things. They are just aas evil for Repubicans as for Barack Obama. However, you can COUNT on me to fight evil with evil. As long as the mianstream media keeps up this evil injection of religion into politics, AS RELIGION, then I am going to keep up my own qukestioning of whether Barack Obama is a Christian. I do not turn the other cheek. Bill Maher and I agree that Obama is NOT a Christian, and you are going to hear that from me up until at least November of 2102--so long as the mainstream media keeps up its own obsession with Rebpulicans and religion (a sure thing--meaning tht both you and I can COUNT on this blog continuing to point out that Obama is not a Christian through at least the November election).
Oh. Piers Morgan. I have not even gotten to the punch line--the PROOF. Piers Morgan spent a substantial lpart of the interview with Santorum attacking Snatorum on his UNIMPORTANT views on homosexual "issues". Morgan-SMARMY as he is--wanted to make clear he did not like the answers. So what did the slimy Limey do? You should know this one. I told you in yesterday's article. Morgan asked Santorum, with a smirk: "Let us get back to basics. Do you believe that homosexuality is a sin?" I could never make this stuff up. That is an EVIL question. It is a direct, obviuos injection of religious DOCTRINE into politics. And NO, Republkcans do NOT ordinarily do that. That is reserved for the EVIL people of the mainstream media. Do you really believe, along with the SLIMYU LIMEY, that it is a RELEVANTR ISSUE in the Presidential campiagn whether Rick Santorum believes that "homosexuality is a sin"" Forget that the very questin is nonsense, since the "issue" (in religoin--not politics) is whether homosexual CONDUCT is a "sin". There is just no excuse for this kind of question. Yet, it is what Morgan, and the others at CNN, DO. They are partisan hacks who think the very ASKING of this kind of question HURTS a Repubican.
You want to know Santorum's answer? I think he would have ADVANCED his Presidential campaign had he WALKED OUT on Morgan. That is what he should have done, like Christine O'Donnell. The slimy Limey deserved no less. It was one of the worst questions ever asked on television, and one of the most insullting. I actually like Rick Santorum, and would like him to be ding better in the Presidential race. I think he needs to take opportunities like this to ATTACK THE QUESTIONI--THE EVIL QUESTION. Instead, Sanroum gave the vanilla, if correct, answer. Yes, Santorum said that the question was a THEOLOGICAL one, and outside of the scope of Presidential politics--outside of his expertise or pay grade as a Presidentitial candidate. That is all absolutely corrct. But Santorum, and other Republicans, will get the question again. You can EXPECT similar questons at the Wednesday Repubican debate. Repubicans really do need to start ATTACKING these questons, and CONTINUING to attack them after the evil media peoiple "defend" the question. DO NOT ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS, or let them passs.
P.S. No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment