GOP and the Media Blackmailers of Death: Supercommittee Propaganda Ramps Up

This morning's propaganda headline from the depicable, left wing Associated Press (as featured on AT&T/Yahoo--BOYCOTT AT&T and Yahoo):


"Automatic spending cuts new threat to U.S economy."


Note the pure PROPAGANDA nature of this headline and story. First, consider the word "new". There have been NO "spending cuts". With GOP (Grand Outdated Party) votes, the Federal Government will spend MORE money this current fiscal yar than last year. Any "new" spending "cuts" would be the FIRST significant spending "cuts".


Then note the ASSUMPTION behind the hedline. That assumption is that spending "cuts" are a "threat" to the U. S. economy. IN other words, the partisan, dishoenst reportersoff the despicable AP are deliberatlly TAKNG SIDES on government spending (well, of course, they took sides long agon). The Grand Old Partyy purports (they mostly lile) to belive that out-of-control government spending is the major threat to our economy. PresidentObama, Timothy Geitner and the rest PURPORT to believe (lol) that we have to get our Federal deficit under control, and that we can't "sustain" this continually building debt. They, of course, lie (as to their intentiins and beliefs, although they are perfectly right when they say that). The AP is putting out the naked, propaganda trugth: The left in this country, AND the "establishment", do not beilieve that there should be ANY spending "cuts"


Propaganda point no. 3: It is a LIE, and everyone knows it (including the Sodom and Gomorrah descendants wo become reporters of the AP), that there will be any "automatic spending cuts". This is pure PROPAGANDA (the whole pint, by the way, of the stupid supercommittee fraud foisted on us by both the Democrats and GOP members of Congress). The fact is, as the LIAS of the AP are ignoring, that there are NO "automatic spending cuts' that go into effect without a "supercommittee deal'. The suppposed "cuts' do not occur until 2013, and what Congress has done Congress can (and will) UNDO. Everyone knows that there will either be a SHAM "deal" (as far as any spending "cuts" are concerned), or Congress will RESCIND the "automatic cuts". This is nothing but naked BLACKMAIL. The media and the left found this to be successful (without people less clear thinking than the author of this blog)--along with the Grand Outdated Party, or at least the politicians of that party--think they SUCCEEDED with this kind of BLACKMAIL with the "debt ceiling" deal AND with the previous "budget deal" for LAST YEAR (contiaining "spending cuts" that turned out to be imginary).


The idea here is to EXTORT the American peole, and thereby obtain COVER for not actually "cutting" spending (especially for GOP members: DEFEAT THEM ALL--all who have go along with ANY of these fradulent "deals", or who do so now, or who fail to CONDMEN their "leadership"). Remember the "debt ceiling debate"? Remember that total fraud? Everyone was told that we "had" to raise the debt ceiling o r the economy would fail. Before that, everyone was told that we "had" to have a "budget deal" (no matter what kind of deal), because if the government shut down the economyh would fail (as Wall Street economic fasicsts "lost confidence" in the ability of our politicians to do what Wall Street wants--another part of the EXTORTION here). Meanwhile, and this was deliberate on the part of Democrats, the media AND TOP politicians, the focus on SPENDING was totally lost. Our politicians have become so used to these SCAMS and SHAMS (not to mention false numbers and false "deadlines") that I don't even think they have any idea what they are actually trying to do. The SHAMS and SCAMS have become an end in themselves, as politicians show that they are only interested in DECEIVING the American people. Now the despicagble AP, and the rest of the mainstream media DO know that they are doing: They are trying to accompish the goal of the "Occupy Walal Street" movement, which is to DESTOROY CAPITALISM and bring in some kind of legtist utopia like Greece, Italy and Spain).


Yoiu should realize what the AP headline is all about. It is pure EXTORTION and PROPAGANDA, telling the GOP (Grand Outdated Party) that they BETTER go along with ANY deal, or the media will blame THEM for the economy going downhill (instead of the debt and out-of-control spending that is really resposible). But his is a double-edged extortion. The AP, and mainstream media, are trying to EXTORT the American people (again) with FEAR (scare stories) designed to havethe American peole believe that ANY "deal" is better than no deal, and that they should convey that message to politicians (especailly GOP politicians who have set this up as COVER for themselves in the first place).


Correct headlines:


"Rising debt continues to threaten to make recovery impossible, as CB(O head warned Obama"


"Rising oil prices, spurred by out-of-control world spending, new threat to economy"


"Does China criticism of European system as encouraging laziness and sloth apply to U.S?"


"Was Vladimir Putin, Russian ruler, right that the U.?S. is repeating the mistakes of the old Soviet Union?'"


"Why should we believe that FAILED central bankers, such as Ben Bernanke, should be granted complete contorl of our economic policy?"


"Are "Occupy" people being USED to give control of our economy, and our lives, to Wall Street?"


"Is Obama attempt to turn U.S .into Europe a new threat to U.S. economy?"


"Is the U.S., under Ben Bernake, a 'currency manipulator' threatening the world economy, as Russia and China have alleged?"


I could go on, but you get the picture. What? You say that the above headlines are BASED? Well, some of them are and some of them are not. But ath is the point, isn't it? Nonne of the above headlines are anumy more BIASED--most less--that the despicable AP headine quoted above. Pluse, the above heldines have the virtue of being TURE, while the AP headline is full of multiple LIES.


Nope. The GOP (Grand Outdated Party) gets NO cover in this blgo. If they go along with thei extortioni and fraud that they have set up, they should ALL be DFEATED. This blog, based on evidence that has already become conclusive, has totally abandoned and walked away for the GOP. However, the GOP does not know just HOW strongly I can campaign AGAINST THE GOP. And I will. The more fraud the GOP commits, the worse it is goign to be forr them, and it is already bad. You should, of course, already support EVERY challegne to a GOP incumbent from the right. Nope. I do not care WHO the GOP incumbent is. If the challegner accuses that incument of not standing up against the BETRAYAL by the GOP leaderhip, then the challenger should be supported.


P.S. No proofreading or spell checkng (bad eyesight).