Herman Cain: Vast Left Wing Media Conspiracy

Let me give you a hpothetical fact situation:


Say, back in the day, there was a "black" man who was "passing" for "white" in a bigoted area of teh South. Say some rival of that black man (say someone trying for the same, coetitive job) finds out that the man allegedly has enough "black" ancestors to make him "black" (according the the standards of the old Ku Klux Klan and th eMODERN left). Let us assume that this RIVAL arranges for this informatin to get to the worst elements of the Ku Klux Klan. Then the Ku Klux Klan LYNCHES the "black" man for trying to pass as white. End of hypothetical fact situation.


Who is respoonsible for the lynching of the blakc man? Okay. I think we can all agree that the RIVAL for that competitive job has responsibility. But what abut the KU KLUX KLAN? They did th eacutal LYNCHING. Can they say: "Well, we may have done the actual lynching, because of our EVIL attitude toward this kind of man, and these situations, but it is not our "fault'. We were only doing what we do. It was that RIVAL, who is not one of us, who is really responsible for the lynching. You can't claim that WE were part of a conspiracy to lynch the bllack man., when the whole thing was not our idea. It was this RIVAL of the lback man who really is repsonsible, and he is actually part of the same organization to which the black man belongs.".


Ridiculous? Of course it is. The Ku Klux Klan could never avoid responsibility for a lynching it conducted just because it was instigated by someone outside of the Ku Klux Klan with an entirely personal agenda. aYet, this RIDICULOUS "defense" is the "defense" that the mainstream media is asserting with regard to their RACIST conduct iin LYNCHING (figuratively speaking) black man Herman Cain. And the media was already taking this position even before Cain came out and "blamed" the Perry campaign for initiating the outrageous character assassination against him. Thus, I saw CNN--the day before Cain pointed a finger at Perry--say that this could hardly be a "left wing plot" if it had been INITATED by rival Repubicans.


The Hell it can't. Why would a non-Klan member give information to the Klan to destory a black man? Right. It is the same reason a Repubican would give SMEAR information to the mainstream media (who, unlike the fink in my example, even PROMISES to concela the important fact as to who did "leak" the smear information in the first place). Such a Republican (evil himself, although not necessarily in the same way as the mainstream media) KNOWS that the mainstream media is WILLING to SMEAR a conservative black man like Herman Cain. Thus, the Repbican gives the information to the SMEAR MERCHANTS of teh left wing media, with the knowledge that they would handle the SMEAR once it was instigated, in the most unfair way possible. In other words, the Republican fink was COUNINTG on the FAST LET WING MEDIA CONSPIRACY to handle the SMEAR, once they weere pointed in the direction in which they were more than eager to go (just like the rival pointing the Ku Klux Klan at a "black" man, because heKNOWS that the Ku Klux Klan will take action that will destory--hopefully--the balck man).


Nope. It does not matter, despite the protestations of the LIARS of the mainstream media, wheether the "Cain story" was "instigated by a "left wing conspiracy". Whether or not that is the case, it IS a Left Wing Media Conspiracy that has acted to try to destory Herman Cain.


Oh. The word "conspiracy". No, there dees not have to be an EXLICIT media "conspiracy" to destory Herman Cain. Thre is a REASON that all of these mainstream media stories sound the SAME, often using the exact same terminology. They all LISTEN TO EACH OTHER, and only to LEFT WING sources. They all THINK the same. They look at each other's "news" reprots, and consult the same "experts". Nope. This IS a CONSPIRACY. It does not matter whether these peole actually get together an PLAN what they are gong to do. They KNOW what they are going to do. They do it over and over againn.


Thus, this blog has let lyou in okn another left wing media "secret"/ploy. Remember it the next time you hear a mainstream edia person say that that the attack on Herman Cain could hardly be regarded as a "left wing conspiracy", when the original leak came from (possibly) a REPUBLICAN. Remember my hypothetical involving the Ku Klux Klan, and note that the media is in the position of the KLAN: not only racist, but claiming that they are not responsible for the lynching, even though they have CONDUCTED the lynching, because someone else started the all rolling. Have I told you theat these people (of teh mainstream media) are EVIL people? I know I have. This "argument" is an EVIL argument--trying to say that you are not responsible for a SMER you are pushign, jsut because someone else started the ball rolling (knowing taht you would do exactly what you have done).