Romney, Obama and the Lying Hypocrites of CNN and CNN and the Mainstream Media

Senator Obbama, 2998 campaign: "If We keep talkaing about the economy, we are gong to lose"


AP liears (2011-today): "The ad fails to acknowlege that Obama was QUTOING the campaign of hi sopponet, John McCain." You willl remember the finmal resut of my Sodm and Gomorrah search for an honst, competent AP reporter: NO such creature exists, and they are ALL LIARS (as well as being incompetent).


What the AP is referencing is a Rommneyu ad featureing audio of Obama. However, you are a LIAR (who wither works for the AP, or should aply for a maiisnstream media job) if you say that Obama was QUTOING John MCain, or theofficial position of his campaign. What Obaama was doing is exactly what Romney is dokning: Characerizing teh McCain camaping being unable to run on the GOP recordon the economy.


It does not matter whether it is CNN, MSNBC, or any otehr lefat wing propaganda outfit, ALL of the DMOOCRATIC "strategy" assertions over the past 6 months have been exactly the SAME as what Obama was asserting about McCain in 2008: "Obama will run AGAINST the GOp, and Congrss, and nnot ont he econmy (because he can't)." I assure you, becuaes I have heard it time and time again, bhtat Democrats have said this MORE DIRECTLY thatn McCain really ever said it, or than his campaign really said it. But teh principle is the SAME. Indeed, this blog quoted--int he past week--a Democratic "strategist" who AGREED with CNN that Democrats were going to make this eleciton about CHARACTGER (in other words, character assassination), rather than about Obama's record. EVERY media/Democatic strategis has said thaty Obama is NOT going to run "on his record on the economy", but on the idea that the GOP woul dbe WORSE--then sfiting to class warfare, personal attacks and the question fo whether you really want to go back to the Bush eyars (really the OBM/Democrat ytears for the fatal last tow yoyears of teh Bush Presidency)."


Do oyu see why Romeny is RIGHT not to "apologize" (so rar), annd to DEFEND, his CLEVER ad. Is not the Romney ad a clever way to ATTACK this "stragtegy" by Obama of ignoring his failure on the economy? Sure it is. But is not the audio in the Romney ad out of context, because Obama was characterizing his OPPONENT rather than talkng about the current situ;a;ton.? Nope, That is the beauty of teh Romnney ad. That is the POINT. The pint is that Obama was RIGHT in 2008 when hes said that McCain could not afford to talk about the economy, and Obama is ding EXACTLY THE SAME THING, FOR THE SAME REASON, in 20111 and 2012. In other words, the very attack on the Romney ad makes the main ponit of the Romney ad, and it is a FAIR pont. Obama is at least as much responsible for the sad shape of teh economy noew as McCain was in 2008 (McCain , of course, being merely 1 of 100 Senators, which was also true of OBAMA--wwho was part of teh DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY when teh economyt collapsed).


Nope It is a clever ad. IN today's world of policitcs, where the MEDIA runs character assassination "ads" (masquerading as "news') every single day, this knid of ad is more than fair., It is a valid way of making a vali point. the idea that the AD has to "spell out" excatly what I have said abouve is INSANE. To say that the media apppleies his kind of standard to Obama/Democrat ads is more than insane. It is a LIE, told by parisan liars who lie more blatantly and indefensibly every single day (referring to the mainstream media, if I hav to spell THAT out for you).


I will probably make a separate article about Joh King, one of the WORST LIARS AND HHPOCRITES to eve live, on CNN, The Liar Network (King doing a "rant" on a Romney ad-- maybe this one--wchih again was more of an attack on CNN than on Romney).


P.S. Noo proofreading or spell checkng (bad eyesight).