Anderson Cooper, Dishonest Jack Cafferty and CNN: Hypocrisy, Inc.

I promised you at the end of last week that I would have about 5 more articles matching the orchestrated CNN campaign againt Michele Bachmann with my own campaign against Anderson Cooper and CNN. This is the first of those articles (read thearticle on Anderson Cooper at the end of last week, if yoou want to know what I am talking about.)


We need to go back to Dishonest Jack Cafferty. After the CNN debate, Dishonest Jack gave a rant againt the Republicans in the debate becaue lthey ANSWERED CNN questioins on social issues like abortion and "gay issues". As this blog stated in m previous article on Dishonest Jack, it is actually CNN that is OBSESSED with "social issues", and not the Republican candidates. Cafferty suggeted that Republicans needed to be talking aobut the IMPORATNAT things that people care about (jobs and the economy and the like), and not getting distracted with these "social issues'. As I informed you at the time, Cafferty LIED. CNN is The Liar Network. Cafferty was not upset that Republicans were "talking about" social issues (in ANSWER to CNN questions, for God's sake). What Cafferty was upset about is the he DISAGREES with the answers Republicans gave. Indeed, Cafferty has since made clear that it is HE who is willing to totally distract people with "social issues", and that Cafferty is willing to SELL OUT this country rather than vote for a Republican who disagrees with him on these "unimportant, distracting" social issues. You might suspect that the entire "social issue" thing is partly because CNN believes the issues are so IMPORTANT that you should be willing to destroy the economy of this country rather than vote for a Republican who does not share the CNN view on these issues, and partly because "social issues" is just a way to ATTACK Republicans in the area CNN believes they are vulnerable (CNN not agreing with Republicans on economic issues either, but unsure lthat an ATTACK there is likely to work). Again, CNN is The Liar Network, and Anderson Cooper the most SANCTIMONIOUS liar on that network.


That brings us to the TWO Anderson Cooper attacks on Michele Bachmann last week. Both attacks were on Michele Bachmann's HUSBAND, and inspired by "gay activists" (as if Anderson Cooper and CNN were not "gay activists"). Dishonest Jack, what did you think of this DISTRACTION away from the IMPORTANT "issues" in this campaing. Not only did Cooper foucs on a "gay issue", but he did not even do so with regard to the CANDIDATE. Rather, CNN tried to parse the words and actions of HER SPOUSE--you know, like attacking Michelle Obama. Has CNN EVER, by the way, "invetigated" Michelle Obama? Don't be silly. This is HYPORISY, INC. (CNN). Back to Dishonest Jack. I have to apologize to him I asked above what he thought of CNN violating his strong views on the IMPORTANT issues in this campaign, but I momentarily forgot that his very name is: Dishonest Jack". It is like asking Casey Anthony what happened to her daughter. It gets worse. I promise you.


What was the approach by Anderson Cooper at the end of last week, on his SECOND program taking on Miechel Bachmann's SPOUSE? You have to understand a little of the concept here. Cooper hhad two LEFTIST guests. One was the most partisan leftist alive: Paul Begala. The other was the worst, and most leftist of the Bush Press Secretaries, who later wrote a book trasing conservatives and the Bush Administration (Ari Fleisher--I describe him because I can't speell the name and don't want to look it up for lack of interest). BOTH of these leftist--especially leftist on homosexuality, CRITICIZED Cooper for attacking a SPOUSE of a candidate. But Cooper is a propagandist, and SANCTIIMONIOUS LIER. So what do you think he di? Right. He brushed aside the criticism with the statement: "Well, we have tried to ask Meichele Bachmann HER views on her husband's comments, but she won't answer ur questions because she does not want to be distracted from the important issues in this campaign."


I could never make this stuff up. Dishonest Jack Cafferty, with Wolf Blitzer nodding agreement, says that Republicans should sop answering questions on "social issues", because they are a "distracton" from thereal issues lthat people care about. Bachmann takes Cafferty's advice, when CNN is deliberatelyl trying to distract her campaing into defending her husband, and LIAR and HYPOCRITE Anderson Cooper tries to make BACHMANN out as dishoenst for failing to get distracted by this unfair attack on HER HUSBAND. CNN really is composed of the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. And Anderson Cooper and Dishonest Jack Cafferty are the worstr of the worst.


Let me make it reallyl clear for you what Anderson Cooper tried to do--over the doubts of his tow dubious, leftist guests that a candidate's spulse should be attacked this way. What Cooper vritually said he was dong was ATTAACKING Michele Bachmann's spouse abut the activities of that spouse--including the statements of that spouse unrelated to Bachmann's political campaign--so that Cooper and CNN could then BOOTSTRAP their alleged "dirt" on Bachmann's spouse into ATTACKING question to Bachmannn. And then Cooper wants to condemn BACHMANN for refusing to answer CNN's questions!!!!


This is really the worst hypocrisy I have ever seen. Again, Cooper is the wors, most sanctimonous, most dishonest hypocrite I have ever seen. (Just keeping him honest) As I said in my previous article, I will be diisappointed in Michele Bachmann if she pays any attention to CNN ever again--especailly to CNN questions designed to do nothing but DISTRACT her campaign. We have Dishonest Jack's work for that (although "Dishonest Jack" is no more dishonest than "keeiping them honest" Anderson Cooper).


P.S. Again, not proofreading or spell checking (eyesight).