Sarah Palin and CNN: Larry King, an Evil, Evil, Evil Person (Ed Schulz Guests)

Yes, the left is turning all of its sexist guns on Sarah Palin, in a revelation of the true EVIL hate on the left in this country.  For example, AOL contains another story today about these "revelations" about Sarah Palin. I hate to break it to the stupid, evil people in the leftist media, but it is NOT a "revelation" about Sarah Palin that her 17 year old daughter is going to get married (and, by the way, is pregnant), like my first cousin did some 30 years or more (still being married to the same man).  It, of course, used to be COMMON for women to marry at 17 or 18.  I see nothing fundamentally wrong with it now, although I think sex outside of marriage is a very bad idea at that age.  In Regency England, the "season" (known as the "marriage mart") for girls of good birth happened at age 17 or 18, and a girl was "on the shelf" if she were not married by 20.  I digress (sort of).

 

One by one, I am showing why essentially all of the people at CNN have exposed themselves to be biased, evil people.  The latest example is Larry King, who had a "panel" last night about Sarah Palin's daughter (read those last three words and weep as to how distorted and evil our media has become).  It was who was on the panel, and what Larry King let them say (knew they would say)  that exposed Larry King for the evil person hat he is.   You might well wonder at nasty old man Larry King even talking about Sarah Palin and her daughter without a thunderbolt coming down from on high. 

 

Thus, we had leftist political hack, and fat slob, Ed Schulz, saying things beyond evil, inton the realm of hyper-evil, as Larry King fed him softballs, and listened approvingly.

 

To Schulz (I could never make this up) Palin and her daughter OWED "explanations" to the public.  Another marvelous sentence to just sit there an contemplate with censorious awe.  EXPLANATIONS!!!!  What does that mean?  Yes, "questions", "revelatons", and "explanations are mere leftist buzz words to suggest (they think) that they are saying reasonable things, when they (picked up routinely by the leftist media like CNN) are saying horrible, evil things. 

 

Schulz and the despicable King do not expect you to THINK about this stuff.  It is just meant to be leftist cant.  I guess Schulz (if ever there were an evilman, this is it--he looks and sounds like the caricature of a villain in a Dickens novel) is saying that the 17 year old girl should undergo an interrogation as to WHY she got pregnant.  Never mind that she is not running for ANYTHING.   I guess she is supposed to tell us what she thinks of her mother's values, and why she "rebelled" against such values.  She is probably, in this evil, leftist fantasy, supposed to explain how the failure of her mother to provide her with proper sex education led her into sex without protection.  Remember, leftists FAVOR sex for teenagers, despite the lip service to the contrary, but PROTECTION is their God.  Further, if protection fails, leftists WANT the girl to have an abortion (I kid you not; this is an absolute fact, so long as you understand that when I say "leftists" I mean MOST leftists of the rather extreme, MoveOn.org, Planned Parenthood, ACLU type).  Back to the leftist fantasy.

 

I am sure part of the "explanations" Schulz wants you to believe you deserve is for Sarah Palin to be interrogated, in addition to the Spanish Inquisition of her 17 year old daughter, and "explain" why she FAILED as a parent for not teaching her daughter to have a discreet abortion (albeit one which Planned Parenthood would have been sure to leak) so that no one would ever know about her pregnancy.

 

Look at the previous entry on another evil CNN person, Wolf Blitzer.  I explained to Wolf HOW he was led to the Dark Side by leftist cant.  Ed Schulz confirmed everything I said, as if there were ever any doubt.  I KONW these evil people.  Schulz said that the thing that is wrong with Republicans is that they have asserted the moral high ground, while remaining fallible human beings.  In other words, as I explained to you.  Republicans are supposed to be PERFECT, or else they are not allowed to speak about morality.  The entire FAMILIES of Republicans are supposed to be PERFECT.  I gues that extends to nieces, nephews, cousins, etc.  It does NOT extend to Democrats, who are EXPECTED to be immoral hypocrites (like Bill Clinton and John Edwards).  Thus, Barack "Wrold" Obama can say, in his acceptance speech, that we are all "our brother's keeper", while letting his OWN HALF-BROTHER live in a hut outside of Narobi, Kenya on $12.00 a year, or a month, or some such thing.  Schulz EXPECTS hypocrisy from Democrats.  The problem here is that PALIN is NOT being "hypocritical" in any sense of the word because of what her DAUGHTER did.  That means that leftist Democrats and the media are merely exposing themselves, in this particular case, for the MEAN SPIRITED, sanctimonious hypocrites they are.  It is an act of SELF-DESTRUCTION that Obama recognized (to his credit), and people like Larry King, Schulz, and all of CNN do NOT recognize.

 

Therefore, you have leftist political hack Ed Schulz, with Larry King sitting there nodding, trying to bootstrap this 17 year old girl into a rehash of every Republican "sex scandal" of the past decade.  Problem:  this is NOT a sex "scandal" in ANY sense of the word.  It is merely a case of a 17 year old girl getting pregnant.  It is NOT adultery.  In fact, it is merely a matter of dates.  Ed Schulz is going back to the days of "counting" whether a baby comes less than 9 months after a marriage.  Gee, that's progress.  That's "enlightenment"--NOT.  It is EVIL is what it is, and CNN and Larry King are nuts to think that they escape the extreme taint of EVIL by "balancing the hateful "opinions" of Ed Sculz with other panelists.  To Larry King:  You are an evil, evil, evil person, and CNN is exposed as an evil netowork.

 

It gets worse (yes, I would not have believed it either).  Ed Schulz went on t say (all within the 5 minutes or so I could stand to watch) that Sarah Palin was a monster for putting her daughter through this, KNOWING what people like Ed Schulz, Larry King, CNN and the rest of the media would do to her daughter.  Schulz said:  "How cold a mother put her 17 year old pregnant daughter up on stage, knowing what she was going to be put through once the media and leftists invaded her privacy".  The only part about that I made up was the "invaded her privacy" part.  Sarah Palin is not the MONSTER here.  Larry King is the MONSTER.  Ed Schulz is the MONSTER.  The rest of the mainstream media and leftists trying to USE a 17 year old girl to destroy her mother, while leftists attempt to DESTROY the girl, are the MONSTERS. 

 

Yep.  You got this right.  With Larry King nodding (hard to tell, of course, if he were drifting off to sleep), Schulz was, in effect, suggesting that Palin should have sequestered her daughter in a NUNNERY, or some other shelter to have her baby in SHAME--with her mother reading sermons over her instead of running for Vice President.

 

I repeat;  These people (trying to USE and destroy a 17 year old girl this way in a totally illogical attack on her mother) are EVIL MONSTERS.  They just keep getting worse/