Michelle Bockman and MSNBC: Social Issues Are Everything (as Dishonet Jack Cafferty Cheers)

Ichelle Bockman (in the CNN debatge): "This election will be all about the economy." (going on to explain how Obama is ruining the economy and jobs, as Obama is off on a sTRANGE trip to puerto Rico the day after the mainstream media headlines were : "Obama focusing on jobs").


Now Dishonest Jack Cafferty, and the CNN debatge, already told you that CNN is OBSESSED with social issues, and can hardly give any passing attention to the economy. Doubt me? Bill Maher--anti-Christian comedian--was on the anti-Christian network to "analyze the Repubican field last night. Yet, Dishonest Jack Cafferty was sputing the CNN party linie that Republicans should not even DEFEDN THEMSELVES on "social issues' when CNN brings them up. These are HYPOCRITES--the worst hypocrites to ever walk the Earth, on two legs or four. They are among the most DISHONEST people to ever walk the Earth. And yes, fellow travelling "establishment" Republicans who want to adopt this DISHONEST line of the mainstream media to make their opponents on "social issues" shut up ar merely lproving how dishonest and obsessed with social issues they are. But Miichelle Bockman issued lthe CHALLENGE that this election is all about the econmy. Surely, any attacks on her would be on that basis. Indeed, the TEA PARTY has benn primarily about the ECONOMY, the deficit, and limited government. It is ME who told you, and the despicable AP, that this mainstream media idea of a massive "divide" betwen fiscal conservatives and social conservatives is a mainstream media FANTASY. MOST social conservatives are fiscal conservatives, and MOST fiscal conservatives are social conservatives. "Establishment" Republicans arfe NETIERH true fiscal conservatives nor social conservatives, and TAHT is where any "divide" exists. But we have the WORD of CNN and MSNBC that social issues are NOT IMPORTANT. And Michelle Bockman agreed with them that this particular election is going to be all about the econmy. So what did MSNBC do?


I saw about 30 seconds (more lthan enough) of the MSNBC hit piece on Michelle Bockman tonight. So, of course, MSNBC attack Bockman on economics? Attacked her on her criticism of Obama's economic programs? Attacked her on how she intends to turn the economy arond? IN YOUR DREAMS. What MSNBC did--as Dishonest Jack Cafferty cheered, (see yesterday's article on Dishonest Jack, dishonest car salesman deluxe) was attack Michelle Bockman on what MSNBC, CNN and Democrats consider IMPORTANT: SOCIAL ISSUES. Yes, MSNBC had a guest, in that 8 o'clock hour competing with O'Reilly, who was there solely to attack Bockman as an EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN who opposes gay rights. That is waht MSNBC (anti-Christian bigots all, as is true of CNN) obvisouly considers IMPORTANT. Consider the message here. Michelle Bockman is telling you this election is all about the economy, and the fundamental qeustionis of what kind of economy and government (very big, or limited) that we want. MSNBC and CNN are telling lyou this election is all about SOCIAL ISSUES. It goes further than that. MSNBC is telling you to IGNORE whether Michelle Bockman, cand the policies she advocates, can turn the economy of this country around--turn around our death spiral into a Federal Government dominated econjmy. MSNBC and Dishonest Jack Cafferty are telling youo to IGNORE what they otherwise tell you--dishonest that they are--is all people now care about, and instead vote against Michelle Bockman on SOCIAL ISSUES. As I stated in my previous article on Dishonest Jack Cafferty, this is what MSNBC is telling you: "SELL YOUT your country if lyou don'ot like Michelle Bockman's religion or her position on homosexual activism. CRUCIFY your country on a cross of 'homosesxual rights'"


Q.E.D. I am PROVEN right again. It is DEMOCRATS, and the mainstream media, who are truly willing to SELL OUT this country--see it destroyed--because they don't agree with a candidate's position on these "unimportant" SOCIAL ISSUES. And "establiishment" Republicans are saying: "See. You social conservatives have o realize there are people like that out there, who are willing to let this country DIE because of your consrvative position on social issues, and you have to cater to them." Hogwash. Dishonest Jack Cafferty may well be an "establishment Repubican" He thinks just like those stupid, dishonest people do. Nope. I am not saying you are autmatically stupid or dishonest to disagree with me on scoial issues. That is YOUR position (if you are an establishment Republican). I amy sying you are stupid and dishonest if you make this argument: elevating "scoial issues' to extreme importance, while pretending to say that it is ONLY the econlmy that is imoportant. I can vote for someone who disagrees with me on a social issue. I could NEVER votefor, or even repsect, a person who makes the Jack Cafferty argument (or even makes me suspect they are aiming in that directin).


P.S. No proofreading, or spell checking (bad eyesight).