Kyra Phillips is the "attack dog" CNN sent to Alaska to check out leftist KOOK rumors abut "dirt" on Sarah Palin. How do I know that Kyra was sent to Alaska as an attack dog? First, it is obvious. Second, Anderson Cooper told me so.
"I don't want to defend Sarah Palin (WHY NOT, when CNN sent attack dogs to Alaska to ATTACK Sarah Palin, as you admitted with this statement), but aren't you being SEXIST." (emphasis added, and parenthesis added). See last week's entries when I discovered I was LESS sexist than the mainstream media, once Palin was chosen, even though I am a sexist pig.
Kyra had said that there were lots of discussions and questions in Alaska about whether Palin was betraying her "values" as a mother, as she goes for a VP job that she will have difficulty combining with motherhood.
ANDERSON COOPER (I don't believe it either) was put in the position of stating the obvious to the WOMAN, leftist, attack dog CNN was putting on the air multiple times today. She was the "reporter" whose "report" Bill Bennett accurately called a disgraceful piece of "advocacy journalism". Bennett's only fault was not being strong enough.
Back to CNN sexism. So Anderson Cooper had to point out to Kyra that no one criticized Barack "World" Obama for not being able to be a good FATHER if he becomes President. It is as if CNN had just discarded 40 years of feminism, and gone back to the view that women cannot work in challenging jobs without neglecting their children. No wonder poor Anderson looked embarrassed.
Yes, Kyra continued to say that people in Alaska were upset about Palin's "lack of family values" (leftist cant) without producing a single ALASKAN to say so. As I said, Kyra obviously understood her role to be an ATTACK DOG--substituting for a helpless Joe Biden. There was nothing but innuendo and conclusory attacks--NO factual "news" at all.
Cooper was also forced to ask Kyra about that other media attempt to manufacture a scandal about Sarah Palin--the alleged "abuse of power" as to that state trooper. Frankly, Kyra seemed more interested in trashing the CHARACTER of Sarah Palin--saying that there were all kinds of questions in Alaska about her character--without producing any actual FACTS.
This led poor embarrassed (at his own evil network) Anderson Cooper to say that anyone can make ALLEGATIONS, but could Kyra produce any FACTS to support the allegations. It turned out she couldn't. All she could do was restate the ALLEGATIONS, and make incoherent references to "revelations" and a "phone call", without explaining at all what the "revelations" were, or the phone call was about.
I repeat. Kyra Phillips was revealed as nothing more than a CNN attack dog sent to Alaska to try to attack Palin's character--with the obvious instructin to report RUMOR and GOSSIP on the ground of examining the opinion in Alaska of Sarah Palin's character.
I state flatly: Kyra Phillips is an evil, evil, evil person who should not be reporting for the Mt. Ida Gazette (Mt. Ida being that town of about 750 people where I lived most of the first 12 years of my life).
Yes, I am perfectly aware that Kyra Phillips is following what she perceived to be her mission from CNN. That does not change my opinion of HER, which is somewhere below my opinion of that killer mother in Florida, but illustrates that CNN is an evil network.
It is clear. CNN should fold its tent and steal quietly into the night. It has no viewers anyway, and does not DESERVE to exist anymore.
P.S. Did I mention that Kyra Phillips and CNN are SEXIST? I am sure it is implied. Poor Hillary Clinton and the REAL feminists (who are not leftist political hacks) have such a SOLID complaint.
2 comments:
Kyra is a babe. I would do her, and Sarah too.
There are obvious contradictions regarding Sarah Palin. Premarital sex and unwed pregnancy are issues to be pondered particularly by the unusually pious Neo Conservative wing of the Republican Party.
Kyra Phillips is a wonderful reporter and i look forward to more straight forward journalism from her.
This blog posted by "The Maverick Conservative" appears to be mostly reactionary emotionalism. It seems to be obsessed with combating any story that does not portray Sarah Palin in a "Mother of God" contest. Yet I believe based on the information coming out about her practices, she is anything but what she claims to be.
Her life and what comes forth from her mouth seem to suggest
a wrong choice, confusion, and above all deceit. Have we seen this before? I would say yes. We saw it at the beginning of the term of G.W. Bush. He lied to the American People about WMDs.
As we all know WMD's would have been the proof Americans needed to justify the war at the time. It was a lie perpetrated by
the Bush Administration.
We see a pattern of lieing, disregard and disrespect again developing on the part of John McCain and Sarah Palin. The message that is being sent is almost identical. In their eyes
it is alright to lie if (if you think you can get away with it) and
(2) if you can get the American people to buy a deceitful notion that you know is a lie before the fact.
Is it more of the same? Absolutely. Do we want 4 more years of this kind of in your face disregard and disrespect? Absolutely not.
Post a Comment