Sarah Palin and CNN (Campbell Brown): Did I Influence McCain?

Did I influence the John McCain campaign? 

 

Look at the evidence.  The McCain campaign canceled an interview today with CNN.  They did it because of Campbell Brown (supposedly).  See previous entries in this blog today about Campbell Brown.  She is an evil woman who has shown that her entire mission is to TRASH Sarah Palin. The specific McCain decision came after a Brown interview of a McCain spokesman where she virtually yelled at him, repeatedly, over his insistence that Governor Palin had made decisions as Commander of the Alaskan Natioinal Guard (as it was obvious she would have, since it is a certainly that the National Guard would be called out IN ALASKA almost every year (some natural disaster somewhere). 

 

Well, I think that ws just an excuse.  I think that the McCain campaign realized that Campbell Brown was engaged in a campaign to DESTROY Sarah Palin, but more importantly that CNN has been engaged in a campaign to DESTROY Sarah Palin.  Nor has it been "fair".

 

If I were the McCain campaign, I would give NO interview with either McCain or Palin for the rest of the campaign.  Further, I would VETO any participation by CNN, or any CNN reporter, in any debate.  Yep.  I would do the same as to MSNBC, and be CAREFUL about the other members of the mainstream media.

 

Okay, we know that Campbell Brown, and CNN, have no "journalistic" "standards" at all, and no reason to exist.  We know they are evil, biased people engaged in the politics of personal destruction.  We know they are sexists.  All of that more than justifies the McCain decision not to grant an interview.  But what about the McCain campaign EXCUSE.  Did Campbell Brown really go over the line in her interview with the McCain spokesman?  Of course she did.  My conviction remains that CNN was reaping the fruits of their entire body of evil work, and not just that one interview.  But the interview was bad.

 

WHY?  Well, Campbell Brown was only interested in beating up the spokesman about the supposed lack of experience of Sarah Palin.  But Brown refused to accept the answer that Sarah Palin had military (not, despite CNN LIES, foreign policy experience) experience as Commander in Chief of the Alaskan National Gurard.  True, that is not exactly impressive military experience.  However, Campbell Brown was not interested in that point.  She wanted to BEAT UP the guy.  Therefore, she DEMANDED (as I said, virtually yelling), that the spokesman specify the EXACT experience (the EXACT reason for the deployment of the Alaskan National Guard).  The spokesman said, in obvious puzzlement and frustration, that the National Guard is called out for Alaskan emergencies.  But Campbell Brown INSISTED, as rudely as possible (see my friend's description of her as a first class B---H in the previous entry setting forth his email), that the spokesman describe her SPECIFIC experience. 

 

Give me a break.  Sure, the spokesman MIGHT have known.  But then Campbell Brown, if she were a REAL "journalist", and well prepared, might have known as well.  CNN had no problem checking after the fact and determining that Governor Palin had employed the National Guard to deal with wildfires.  That is the point here. Was there any PURPOSE here in DEMANDING this much specificity, when the information is so easily checked?  ONLY if you are really interested in beating up on the spokesman, instead of getting information.  Sure, the McCain spokesman appeared to not understand what she was asking, but he was FRUSTRATED at that point by her MANNER. 

 

Then there is the evil, biased Wolf (Blitzer).  See earlier entry.  Wolf suggested that it was the MISSION of "journalists" (lol) to confront interviewees, so long as they do it with both sides.  First, I DISAGREE strongly that it is the job of "journalists" to PUSH a point of view, rather than seeking information.  However, the part of this that is a LIE is that CNN "confronts" DEMOCRATS in this kind of aggressive, rude way.  They don't.  If Wolf thinks they do, he is even more sexist and senile than I thought.

 

P.S.  The interview in questioin was supposed to be with Larry King, who was PART of that evil CNN "politics of personal destruction" trying to destroy Sarah Palin.  I would NEVER have given King an interview.