AT&T and Yahoo: Boycott AT&T and Yahoo for Featureing Disgraceful AP Propaganda

Here is one of today's FEATURED headlines on AT&T/Yahoo (the AT&T default page on my internet service, which I keep as my default page as a sacrifice FOR YOU)--the sotry, of course, being from the disgraceful, dishonest partisans at the Associated Press:


"S&P shamed after U.S. downgrade"


Headlinne a day or so ago (could never make this stuff up):


"The man who found lthe 2 trillion dollar S & P error"


What can you say about a "news" organization so twisted that it thinks it is a MAJOR sotry to ferret out who "found' an error tthat S & P thought immmaterial and a matter of technical "interpretation"? Partisans? Of course. Political hacks? Of course. Dishonest? Of course. The worst "news' organizations to ever exist? Maybe, but that may be going too far. My preferred wa of putting it is that there is NO worse "news" organization in this, or any other, univers, because there cannot be.


Then to follow that up with calling the S & P "shamed"? Or is it AT&T and Yahoo that made up that headline? Hardly matters, does it. BOYCOTT AT&T and Yahoo. These are partisan political hacks. These are not "journalists". If lyou think otherwise, I am ASHAMED of you. You are more SHAMED than Standard and Poors (who I have accurately called part oft The Stupidest People on Earth, along with the mainstream media).


Hacker Boy (and I still deny any connectin with Rupert Murdoch): "Skip, how can you caall and organization part of The Stupidest People on Earth, and then criticize mainstream media people for attacking the same organization I am glad to again hackinto your disgraceful blog and point out how inconsistent you are."


Skip: "I am glad Hacker Boy again has given me the chance to show that it is not ME who is being inconsistent. Unlike the mainstream media, I have consistently told you that the people in our financial community, INCLUDING THE PEOPLE LIKE BEN BERNANKE AND TIMOTHY GEITNER who are supposedlyb clapable of CONGROLLING our economy and "sovling" all of our problems, are really pretty stupid (The Stupidest People on Earth). I have done this during the Bush Administration AND during the Obama Administration. I have not done it to try to put out propaganda to support a particular person. Contrast that with the mainstream media, the AP, Yahoo and AT&T. If this had happened under George W. Bush, ask yourself whether the desicable AP would have put on this full court press to support the Administration. This is a test of your honesty. If yoiu are at all honest, you ralize that the AP would have JUMPED on George W. Bush, and even called him a whiner if he attacked a ratings agency for what appears to be a good faith action (if an action by proven stupid people). "


Nope. The AP is disgraceful--nothing but a popaganda outfi in the tank for President Obama, along with the rest of the mainstream media.. "Shamed"? Give me a break. It is the AP, Yahoo and AT&T who are SHAMED, and I am more than willing to do the shaming. It is fine to point out that the S & P is composed of incompetent people, especailly if you did so when you did not have a PROPAGANDA purpose.


And if you DO attack Standard and Poors, as I have done for taking a political positon as if they were elected to something, you CANNOT simultaneously say no one should listen to Standard and Poors, and then BLAME the tea Party and Repubicans for the downgrade, along with saying that that Standard and Poors has shown that President Obama has been proven right about needing to RAISE TAXES. These--the mainstream media and leftist Democrats--are the worst, most dishonest hypocrites who have ever walked the Earth.


WARNING: Again, stay away from AP facilities, unless you want to risk becoming a pillar of salt. My futile Sodom and Gomorrah search for an honset, competent AP reporter. It is a foregone conclusion that the AP is WORSE than Sodom and Gomorrah . As soon as He stops PUNISHING me by keeping me on this futile search, the game is up. Be warned. Take this as you would a tornado warning.


P.S. No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight), as is true of every article unless specifically stated otherwise (which I have not done for an article in months).