Rick Perry's War with the Bushes: Todays Propaganda Negative Ad (Boycott AT&T and Yahoo)

See yesterday's areticle on the negative ad campaign being conducted against Rick Perry by the MAINSTREAM MEDIA. Obama and the Democratic Party do not hae to do it, when their agents in the media will do it for them.


Here is today's negative ad headline from the despicable AP (I think,, since that is almost the sole source of AT&T/Yahoo featured stories on my internet home page--I sometimes forget to check and see whether they have snuck in antoerh leftist source):


"Rick Perry's War with the Bushes"


I assure you that this is meant to be a negative ad against Perry . But is it effective? Look at the IRONY of it. What is the main attack against Perry? Right. He is supposed to be a CLONE of Bush. Why does it not help him if people understand that the "establishment" Bush camp--which I, for one, disowned in 2006, includng Karl Rove, who I would disown again last election in 2010)--does not realy like Perry. As I explained to you a day or so ago, Prery was challenged by PART of the Texas estalbhishment in 2010, with a primary challenge by Kay Bailey Hutchinson. There are rumors that Hutchinson was supported by the Bush people--maybe more than rumors, although it was not a big issue in the primary. George W. Bush did not come out and endorse Hutchinson or anything like that. Still, it is oneof the BEST things that Perry has going for him that he is not part of the Washington/Texas establishment. As I have repeatedly shown you, Perry is hardly an "extrem consrvative", and has to be regarded as part of the TEXAS establishment. However, at least Perry did not fully join the WASHINGTON establishment of TEXANS, represented by Hutchinson, Bush and Rove. Texas, by the way, is a VERY diverse state, as you would expect from its size and population, and you are "mainstream media" dluded if you think a man can be governor of Texas for 11 years and be so sort of "mad conservative". That is a very inaccurate view of Perry--a view seeminly shared by Rush Limbaugh (deleting the "mad" part, and inserting "highly principled") and the mainstream media.



Why do the AP, and the others in the mainstream media, think that it furthers there propaganda purposes to talk about a "war" between Perry and the Bushes, even though it undercuts their s storyline that Perry is a Bush clone? It is because the mainstream edia things that it is ALWAYS a good thing to get Repubicans fighting against one another, even if it means that the mainstream media is inconsistent (which is someting the hypocrites are accustomed to anyway). The mainstream media thinks that there are ENOUGH people who still like President Bush, and even his epole, that they will hold it against Perry if he does not eem to be paying pooer respect to former President Bush. I think it does not matter, and tht Perry IS helped by this, because Perry is really in the sam e positon as Al Gore in 2000 Perry simply HAS to disaassociate himself from President Bush--mainly by being his own man and refusing to let himself be trapped into aligning himself with Bush. Considering theis story, I do not think it should be hard for Perry to do this without really trashing Presdient Bush


Notice why tis is a NEGATIVE ad. Does this story about a supposed "war" (a pretty tame one) between Perry and the Bushes have ANYTHING to do with whether Rick Perry SHOULD be President of the United States? Obviously ot, It is a way to AVOID engaging Perry o the issues. That is what makes it an obivious negative ad. from agents of President Obama (the mainstream media).


By the way, I already knew that I would NEVER (under any circumstances) vote for Jeb Bush or Mitch Daniels (the single dullest man I have ever heard speak) for President of the Untited States. This opinion was agian confirmed by the stories out there that Bush and Daniels are out there tryi gto "recruit" an opponent for Perry to join the Republican field. Now those stories are propaganda, and you have to take them with a ton--not just grains--of salt. But it does have the ring of truth. More importantly, Jeb Bush, Mitch Daniels and the rest are NOT out there taking on Obama, and pushing conservative issues. I am talking JEB Bush here. As far as I am concerned, they should just go away. Daniels is an okay governor of Indiana. He should mind his business there, and avoid makng a worse fool of himself (than he did when he was toying with running for President himself).


P.S No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight). Another little tipi to Perry: Avoid, even if you have to get tough like Donald Trump (a role mode for Repubicans on how to handle the mainstream media), fallng into the trap of talkinag about the alleged "war" with the Bushes. Just deny it and say you want to talk about the real issues. If they still continue, pull a Donald Trump on them Tell them our war is with President Obama, and that is the only war ou are fighting, because the country is at stake.