Starbucks: Economic Fascist CEO Joins Establishment Propaganda (Boyocott Starbucks)

I have now completed my long article on how the etablishment is tring to get its way by holding a GUN at the head of each and every American. See the article before last, which details the history of all of these "deals' that we have been told we HAVE to make.


Little did I know that the CEO of Starbucks would make my point abut the establishment for me, and about the economic fascists in Big Business and on Wall Street, before I even finisted that previous article.


Yep. The brilliant (old sarcasm disease recurring) CEO of Starbucks put out a "public letter" to Starbucks peopele, and to the world, saying that he was calling on all business people to CEASE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS until politicians in Congress (Obnama getting a sort of pass, as usual) go back to work (ending their vacatin) and FIX THINGS. Usual guff about the "debt ceiling' fiasco, and how the "uncertainty" is killing the economy.


"Great." you say. At least here is sombod with SOLUTIONS--a LEADER. Wrong, lizard tongue (May a hippo sit on your electirc car--Johnny Carson/Karnak reference). The Starbucks CEO said that he had NO position on POLICY, but only demanded LEADERSHP freom people elected to "save" us. Maybe he will get aound to the lack of leadershp by Obama--the man elected as the Messiah to "save" us. But I doubt it. Why do I doubt it? Because this Starbuks guy exposed himself, almost literrally, by saying that CORPORATE AMERICA had a resonsibility to go out there and HIRE and EXPAND. Echoes of Obama, anyone? And pep[;e om tje esta;bosj,emt DARE tp crotocoze Michele Bachmann for saying that we have to "live within our means" NOW, wihout really specifying who to do it What a DISHONEST HYPOCRITE this guy is.. What an idiot. So he is suggsting that businesses HIRE, even if it will bankrupt the business? So he is suggesting that my brother, faced with 20 trucks and trailers he could see he could no longer pay for, should have ACCELERATED his bankrupcy, and the firing of ALL of his employees, by hring MORE people he knew he could not afford. I repeat: what an idiot. No wonder I call the people on Wall Street , andin Big Business, The Stupidest People on Earth. And what a man of principle!!!!! (sarcasm disease again) . He contributes to politicians, but professes to have NO "policy" preferences. All he is buyng is influence. Talking aoubt admitting you are an economic fascist!!!! Remember that "economic fascism" has nothing to do with Hitler, but means this economic tehory that Big Government and Big Business should be partners in CONTROLLING and PLANNING the economy.


Let me translate for you. This guy is part of the establishment full court press to force some kind of "grand" deal--some sort of SHAM to say tat we have "solved" our problems. This guy says that all he wnts is for politicians to "ut aside' ideology, and act in the interest of the American peoplle. Forget that this is typical LEFTIST, mainstream media CANT. It is STUPID. It is the "magic wand theory of government": All our leaders have to do, if they put their minds to it, is wave a magic wand and our problmes. are "solved'. This guy even talked about a "long-term' solutionn. I want to scream It is the Soviet Union, "magic wand", five-year plan all over again, except we are MORE dishonest than the old Soviet Union (which may be why Puti--that old Soviet--LECTURES us on fiscal responsibility, having seen the failure of this kind of deception). We, unlike the old Soviet Union, now are pushing TEN YEAR PLANS, and maybe even TWNEY YER PLANS, whiile the current prolbems gert WORSE. Just wave the old magic wand, like the old Soviet Union, says this idiot CEO of Starbudks, and all of our problems will be solved. No, don't ask ME how to solve them Tha is not my job. But I do know that yo have to "set aside" ideology


"Ideology", of course, is just another name for IDEAS. The concept that there is some "soluton" to our problems, floating around there i the ether independent of any "ideology"--independent of any IDEAS on how this country has to move forward--is a mainstream media absuridy. As I have exposed, it is further the ESTABLISHMENT plan to FORCE things to be done their way.


Nopoe. Boycott Starbucks. I might have some rspect for this man if he actually took a policy position. Instead, he is ushign the "party line" that we need to act in some never-never land "outside of ideolongy", "outside of ideas themselves", to discover the "soluton" that is waiting in our magic wand. And, lo' and bhold, that "soluton" just happens to be the SHAM that the mainstream media and our establishment are pushing.


What these people who want to avoid debate are really saying is: Do it our way, because it is the way all thinking people agree upon That is, obviusly, an objective lie. The lie here is that you can declare some gound (upon which you happen to sit) as the "middle grond", and then not defend it as an IDEA (or compositon of ideas). The "middle' HAS to defend its ideas jsut as much as anybody esle, or be exposed for what this CEO of Starbucks is: an economic fascist who does not like either deomcracy or the free market. People like the CEO of Starbucks want to CONTROL your life, and our government, even though they will not defend almost ANY idea (except the idea thta yo have to go along with the Wall Street/leftist establishment on how things should be done).


Nope. BOYBCOTT STARBUCKS.


I have a confessin to make. I don't like Starbucks. I always have liked the Rush Limbaugh variation of the old saying used to describe absurd statements: "That, and a dime, will get lyou a cup of coffee". Rush Limbaugh variation: "That, and $5 (may be $7 now) will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks.".


P.S. No proofreading or spell checkng (bad eyesight).


P.P.S., If ANY deal is all we want, why did the CEO of Starbucks not demand that Democrats accept the Repubican "cut, cap and balance" plan tahat had passed the House, and would have avoided a Standard and Poors downgrade? Could it have been, just possiliby, IDEOLOGY that revented people from accepting the Republican plan? But the CEO of Starbucks does not want to dEFEND his ideas. He is a DICTATOR at heart. He wnats to FORCE other peole to abandon their principles. Boycott Starbucks, even if it is easy for me to say. My daughters, by the way, have loved Starbucks--especially my older daugher. But my younger daughter has switched her allegiace to Dunkin Donuts, and you older duaghter may be willing to do likewise. DUNKIN DONUTS FOREVER(at least until its CEO makes an ass of himself). My younger daughter assures me that Dunkin Donuts has better coffee. I , of course, don't really drink coffee. I have a bigger vice: COKE (as in Coca-Cola). Some people, by the way, even like McDonald's coffee--and it does not cost you $5. Boycott Starbucks.