Rick Perry and Al Gore: Leftist Liars Exposed

Remember the earier article on this blog, in the past week, hwere I told you about the amazing MSNBC attempt to turn Republicans and conservatives againt Rick Perry by sayng that he supported Al Gore in 1988 (when Perry was a Democrat--yet another clue that Perry has not been the conservative "extremiest" that both the mainstream media and Perry seem willing to label him at the present time).? Problem for MSNBC; Even MSNBC had to admit that it really was not going to hurt Perry for people to hear that he supported Gore in 288, before Gore became "Mr. Goobla Warming (as Perry has callled him, correctly). Perry was a conservative Democrat then, and Gore represented hiself as a conservative Democrat. Even Ronald Reagan had once been a Democrat, in the distant past before he became a Repubican Regan liked to say--I miss Reagan more everyday--that he did not leave the Democratic Party; the Democratic Party left him. But MSNBC saw hope. Who says that people had to KNOW that Prry supported Gore in 1988? In a clear message to Perry opponents, and exposing the DECIET that exists in the leftist mind (as stated in the previous blog article), MSNBC noted with enhusiam that "robo calls' would conveniently not mention that the endorsement occurred in 1988. MSNBC was obviously encouraging people to conceall that fact, even if MSNBC could not be quite so obviious (although they have often been just that obvious in the past).


I bet you did not believe that I ecould be PROVEN infusing the leftist mind withhin a week? Surely leftists would be careful about this. You underestimate leftist liars--on the internet and elsewhere. It is hard o believe, but I saw it (I think on the O9Relly Factor, with Laura Ingram substituting for O'Reilly--in any event on the unfair and unbalanced network). There was a leftist guest o the program for "balance". Guess what he talked about? Right, but even I was a little shocked at how he did it.


Yetp. The guest brought up that Perry had supported Al Gore. But he was not just silent on when it happened. He went into a long song and dance about how Pery supported Gore against George W. Bush in 2000, and how much of a betrayal that was. Gore, of course, did not even oppose the elder Bush in 1988, because Gore did not come close to getting the nomination I think it ws Dukakis, but frankly I forget. This shows you what LIARS leftists are. It was not just that the leftist threw in "2000". He went into this long scenario about Perry suppporting Gore against Bush: DETAILS.


What happened when the leftist was called upon it, as he was by the other guest? He simply admtted he mae a mistake, with a cursory "apology", as if this kind of thing happens every day. DETAILS, remember. This guy spun a whol story about the perfidy of Perry, and EVERY detail was a lie (except for the mere fact that Perry endorse Gore at one time). If I were the host, I wold not have let him get away with that "apology". Something more was called for-yet another reason for you to boycott the unfair and unbalanced network. Yes, it is true that the other networks would probably not have called lthe leftist on the lie at all. MSNBC certainly would not have, after virtually telling people haow to distort the facts against Perry. But, more and more, peope on the unfair and unbalanced network don't really say anything. They don't give any real insights, and are certainly not interested in FACTS (true of the whole "modern" "journalist"). You may think this blog has too much over the top emotion and hyperbole for dramatic effect, but I give you the facts as well. The unfair and unbalanced network has become more and more about empty hype, They are so obviously seeking CONGROVERSY and RATINGS that it is rare you get anything out o watching them.


There you have the situaton. Leftists lie as a matter of course, wthout guilt because their lies are meant to advance a "higher" cause than truth. And the unfair and unbalanced network is not interested in the truth at all, so long as their ratings go up (ture, of course, of the leftist mainstream media as well, but those people are so leftist that even ratigs will not induce them to stop putting out obvious propaganda against conservatives.


Wht to do? You actually get more listtening to Rush Limbaugh, if you filter out the bombast (sorof lie reading this blog, as a matter of fact). But the maist thing you need to do is HAVE A MIND that tells lyou whatis obviously propaganda, and SURF various sources to use that mind to put together a real picture of what is going on. As an example, I will telll ou a truth here (without bothering to attemopt to prove it): The unfair and unbalanced network wants Michele Bachmann to LOSE. Now I am not positive myself that Michele Bachmann will be a strong candidate in the general election, although I support her for the nomination. However, the unfair and unbalanced network has no business pushing that view. And I guarantee you that they are. Snide liettle comments here and there. Sort of pushig her aside in coverage. Makng fun of Bachmann's promoise for $2 gas, which is MORE reasonable than any number of Obama promises that the unfair and unbalanced network has not RIDICULED (although they may have criticized some of them). IF we opned ANWR to drilling, removed other restrictiions oon drillng, and PUSHED the development of fossil fues IN THIS COUNTRY, we really cold get to $2 gas.--especailly if we removed all of the artificial barriers to building newe refineries. We could even push the oil companies by refiineries with ANTITRUST pressure (as to which I am afraid I have no condfidence in Bachmann or any toerh Republican or Democrat, since I am the only one in this country who REALLY appears to beieve in free market theory). The point is that it is NOT ridiculous to get to $2 gasoline. That attitude is what KEEPS us from getting to $2 gasoline. Donald Trump is right on this one: we SHOULD have $30 oil right now.


P.S. No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight). Yes, you got a bounus in this article beyond whatever puzzle you had to solve because of my bad typing and lack of proofreading. I did not want to do a separate article on what the unfair and unbalanced network is trying to do to Michele Bachmann, and was tryig to do even before Perry joined the race. So I included it in this article, even thogh it does not really fit.