Bret Baier and the "Unfair and Unbalanced" Network

#$^^#%, the unfair and unbalanced cable Tv network, doubled down on evil this afternoon. Thus, I am doubling down on the criticism of Baier, for wom I have also lost ALL respect, as well as the whole unfair and unbalanced network.


When Brit Hume left is regular position at the unfair and unbalancewd network, the nettwork lost its only real "journalist". I am glad Hume was not involved in last night's debate, because of the respect I have always had for him. I am afraid he would have been sucked into the Fox "party line"--the cable TV mentality of small minds aiming at small minded "triumphs" of ratings and personal gain. Bret Baire--not overly bright--failed totally to avoidd this trap, and proved a worthy current "host" on the unfair and unbalanced network.


Thus, on his show this afternoon, Baire continued the "circle' the wagons" "defense" of the outrageous questions at the Republican debate on the unfair and unbalanced neteork. New Gingrich was labeled a "whiner"--to nods all around. It is the people at the unfair and unbalanced network who aer WHINING: "how can you say these horrible things about us, when all we are doing is what 'journalists' are supposed to do." You mean WHINE because you are called on your unfair and outrageous questions? Newt Gingrich was right, and he was right on Bret Baire as well as Chris Wallace. Baire pulled out some obscure quotes of Gingrich, and then "challenged" Gingrich on them. Gingrich said they were out of context (see below, as Baire proved himself today to be a master of STUPIDTY and OUT OF CONTEXT QUOTES). It does not matter whether Gingrich was quoted out of context or not. This method of "amubsh" questions based on picknig over YEARS of quotes to "challenge" someone is one of those evil practices of modern "journalism". IF you are going to quote someone, it should be on something IMPORTANT, and easy to understand. What Baire did was suggest Gingrich was inconsistent, on something UNIMPORTANT and hard to understand. What can I say? BOYCOTT the unfair and unbalanced network. I would again remind you that I do NOT support Gingrich for President. But I know unfair questions when I see them. The fact that I would not even vote for Gingrich against Barack Obama does not change my sense of fair lplay. The unfair and unbalanced netowrk has NO sense of fair play (a characteristic shared by ALL modern "journalists"--wo are also DUMB).


I deliberately tuned into Baire this evening for the panel discussion on the debate, because I suspected what I would hear. As you knnow, I am never wrong, and I was not disappointed. The unfair and unbalanced network even asserted that Chris Wallace "had" to ask the questin he did abuot Gingrich's campaign staff, in the way he did, or not even be considered a "journalist". No matter that the questin is OLD, and irrelevant to any issue facgnig the contry and irrelevant to whether Gingrich would make a good President. I actually agree with the unfair and unbalanced network here. You CAN'T be regarded as a modern "journalist"--accepted as these cowardly idiots at the unfiar and unbalanced network want to be--without asking this kind of unfair question. Just be sure to WHOM you ask it. If you ask it of Barack Obama, you are going to get a lot of push back. That is why you need to be a COWARD to be a modern "journalist". You have to now who you can INSULT. Yo can insult a CONSERVATIVE WOMAN, like Michele Bachmann. Be very careful about insulting a leftist woman. You can insult fundamentalist Christians, or Mormons--maybe eve Catholis--but be very careful about insulting MUSLIMMS. You can insult a black conservative like Herman Cain or Clarence Thomas, but be VERY careful about insulting a balck leftist (not matter how unrelated to race the insult is). NEVER suggest that homosexual advocates are talking absurdities (as they often are). But ALWAYS sugget that people who sincerely believe in the Christian religion are intolerant. NEVER, however, suggest that MUSLIMS who want homosexuals HANGED for a crime against their religion are intolerant. Oh, I could go on. But you get the idea. The list of hypocrises just neverends, and the unfair and unbalanced network is jsut as involved int haem as the hypocrites of CNN and MSNBC. You will just occasiaonally hear another point of view on the unfair and unbalanced network, so long as their COWARDICE is not really endangered, and so long as they do not have to REALLY be interested in being fair and balanced 9or in information, as distinguished from ratings and personal advancement). I HAVE suggested taht my younger daughter--the NYC attorney--apply at the nfair and unbalanced network, to bring some actual intelligence to the place (radical feminist that my younger daughter may be).


Doubt me. Just never do that. Bret Baire played ONE clip on his panel discussion this afternoon from last night's debate. And it was OUT OF CONTEXT--a unfair and unbalanced segmetn of the "fight" between Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty (where Bachmann handed Pawlenty his head). For this aone, Baire would have lost ALL of any respect I had for him (not much).


Let me give you the facts (something in which the unfair and unbalanced network has no interest--see lMichael Crichton's "Airframe"). In her time in theMinnesota legistlature, Tim Pawlenty (as governor) did one of thsoe FRAUDULENT "comprehensive" "deals". There was a trade off in the bill. The bill provided pro-life "protection for the unborn" (a deliberate part of the "compromises"). At the same time, the bill provided a TAX INCREASE on cigarettes (which we all know has a LOT to do with the issue of abortion). Tim Pawlenty said that Bachmann voted for the same tax increase that he has been criticized for (in fact admitting he made a mistake, as he flails away at some sort of path to convince lpeoplle he is not a dull joke as a candidatrte). Bachmann responded by saying that she was given an impossible choice by Pwwlnety: Either vote for a tx increase or vote AGAINST LIFE. In the debate, she said that she would always choose LIFE, in a choice between life and money. Unfortunately, Bachmann was a little imprecise in her words abut the bill in question, although it was obvius what she meant, and Bachmann's words could be twisted to suggest that the bill was BOTH "anti-life" and pro-tax. . Now Tim Pawlenty was THERE. It ws HIS bill. Tis alone should DISQUALIFY him from any political office--what he said next. Remember, Pawlenty says he is the most "pro0-life" candidate in the race. He asserted that what was wrong with Bachmann was her ANSWER, because her answer suggested that she voted BOTH against life and for taxes. Remember, this was Pawlnety's bill!!!!! The idea that it was a pro-abortion bill was absurd. But Pwlenty was willing to DIHONESTLY tr to use a little tongue -tied impreciseness on the part of Bachmann to LIE about Bachmann and the choice she had. Therefore, in the debate, Bachmann INSISTED that she have further rebuttal to explain what I expain above (and which has to be true). The bill combined pro-life provisions with cigarette tax provisons--whtever else it may have done. It is absrud to suggest that Bachmann EVER voted for a bill with pro-abortin provisions in it, but that is exactly what the despicable Pawlenty suggested. It was a pitiful performance (by Pawlenty).


That did not stop Bret Baire and company from PROMOTING Pawlenty in one of the most dishonest segments I have ever seen Baire played PART of the exchange referenced abbove, as if WANTING to provide conclusive proof that he is on the unfair and unbalanced network Guess which part? I should leave this a a reader exercise, but I will tell you. Baire played the part of the exchange where Bachmann gave the slightly imprecise description of the bill in qquestion, and then the Pawlney assserti that was a transparent LIE (if you heard the whle exchange). What Baire left out was the Bachmann ebuttal, where she explained the obvious lie on the part of Pawlenty. Bren Baire: You are unfair and unbalanced, on the unfiar and unbalanced network, and deserve no respect for an person. Yep. In the same segment that the unfair and unbalanced network was ridiculing Gingrich for accusing them of taking things ut of context--specifically Baire himself--Baier took an exhcange OUT OF CONTEXT. Good goingl, Baire. I odul not have proven the you lack of worht, and lack of worth of your network, any more conclusively if I had written the script myself.


In a few minutse, the fair and unbalanced network PROVED everything both Gingrich and I said about them. Talk about DUMB. These people are bone deep stupid, as well as unfair and unbalanced.


P.S No proofreading or spell checking (bad eyesight). I know. The exact factts of these exhanges are difficult to expalin clearly, even in a well proofread article. I am not that hopeful that the above came out clearly. Just take my word for it. The unfair and unbalanced network proved the truth of that descritption again today, and Bret Baire specifically proved it for HIMSELF by taking an exchange for m the debate out of conteext. By the way, if Baire was a candidate, here is my questin I wiuld ask of him, in the spirit of what the network regars as a fair question: "Whjy do you spell your las t name that way? Are you sure you have not make a spelling mistake. Isn't "Bare" or "Bear" a more reasonable spelling? What ntionality is that name, anyway? Don't you think the peo;le of the South will distrust somone with that kind of name? Hey. I am on a rolll here. Let's keep gong: "How many members of your show's staff have left in the past year? Do you know that some of them have criticized you? Are you happy with the amount of money you are making? Do you really think that Bikll O'Reilly is qualified to be anything but a pompous ass? Do you think Juan Williams was paid too much, just because NPR fired him and your unfair and unbalanced network wanted to rub it in? By the way, hRas Rupert Murdo, or anyone else at News Corps, told you that you need to PUCHH UP these debates by asking unfair questions and promoting fights among the candidates? Do youknow whether Murdoch has usggested to anyone at your network that you need to get a lot more DIRT on people, no matter how you have to do it (like, for exmaple, hacking)? Slap. OUCH Sorry, I had to slap myself or I would have just kept going forever. You can see how I realy missed my calling in life. I should have been a MODERN JOURNALIST.