Do you think I am wrong (you fool) in my analysis of the MISCHARACATERIZATION of the insensitive (at worst) reference of Hillary Clinton? See yesterday's entries.
Consider developments today. First, the truly despicable AP did a HIT PIECE "analysis" on Hillary Clinton keying on a "1984" Big Lie about Clitnon's remark (expanding on the AP lies yesterday). The AP actually had the collosal gall to suggest that that Clinton was making a "veiled" reference to Barack Obama (the AP coming THIS close to saying that Clinton was issuing an invitation to assassinate Barack Obama). The despicable AP, of course, used the refuge of all DISHONEST "journalits" (not other kind works for the despicable AP) by saying that "smoe" considered Clinton to be referring to Barack Obama. I can assure you that is a LIE, because I saw the tape. Clinton was clearly NOT talking about a possible assassination of Obama, but merely searching her mind for examples of other campaigns extending into June (NOT as a "reason" for staying in the race, but as a CRITICISM, and expresson of frustration, about people demanding she get out of the race).
I ask again: WHICH is MORE LIKELY to puts the idea of assassination of Barack Obama in a diseased mind? Is it an inadvertetent, basically accidental, reference to Bobby Kennedy in an OBSCURE interview in SOUTH DAKOTA? Or is it this ginned up HYPE of "fears" about the safety of Obama, and implying that Hillary Clinton may think there is a good chance he may be assassinated? If you have any doubt as to the answer, you are simply dumb (should go to work for the despicable AP). With "friends" like these, Obama does not need enemies. I still think there is almost a Freudian desire on the left to make Barack Obama a MARTYR, as is befitting for a Messiah. After all, the rEAL Obama has shown himself far from being a "post-racial" Messiah.
Still have doubts (your really are a FOOL, aren't you). Well, CNN seems to have almost a FETISH with reporting on "fears" for Barack Obama's safety.
Do you think I made up the title to this entry. You give me too much credit. The title came from the Roswell Beacon (I think in Georgia, and not Roswell, New Mexico). The Roswell Beacon carried a story with that title, with a PICTURE of Obama in the crosshairs. This was a LEFTIST inspired article, HYPING the LEFTIST idea that there are all of those leftists out there ready to martyr Barack Obama.
Nope. I could NEVER make this stuff up. Well, you say, how does that idiot at "The Maverick Conservative" know what is being printed in the Roswell Beacon. Doesn't he have a life (okay, I don't, but hat is another story). He must be seeking out this stuff about Obama 24 hours a day (you say about me). Nope again. I just made the MISTAKE, again, of surfing by CNN for 60 seconds (would have been 15, if I had not been stunned with disbelief at CNN doing it AGAIN (see Sunday or Monday's entry under the title of: "Barack Obama: Does CNN Want Him Killed"). CNNN put this cover on their network today (Roswell Beacon cover: Had YOU ever herard of the publication?). CNN even had the ediotr on to "explain" himself. He did that by explaining, as I said, that the article was meant to be a LEFFTIST (he did not, of course, use that word) "scare" story on all of those racists out there ready to kill Barack Obama.
Most of the "hate" stuff I have seen on Barack Obqama has to do with his supposed MUSLIM heritage, and I have seen very little evidence of much RACIEL hatred out there against Barack Obama. In fact, the frothing at the mouth HATRED out there seems mainly on the LEFT, including the hate speech of Reverend Wright.
Be that as it may. NO ONE was going to pay any attention to the ROSWELL BEACON, until CNN brought this to national attention. It reallly is lucky that CNN has the audience of a test pattern, but it does not seem to matter. The ENTIRE leftist media seems to have the same FETISH about the potential martyrdom of Barack Obama.
It is mind boggling. Poor Obama. Maybe he would not enjoy the thought of being a martyr for the left as much as the left would clearly enjoy having such a martyr. Lest you forget, it has now been FORTY YEARS since the assassinations of RFK and Martin Lutor King, Jr (George Wallace, by the way, was shot around the same time period). Leftists seem to want another martyr.
No comments:
Post a Comment