Santorum and the Biased Media: Too Little, Too Late (By Design?)

One of those disgraceful AT&T/Yahoo headlines, from "The Ticker" (lol t all of these Yahoo "News' "top story" "sources"):


"Santorum: Establishment Republicans are in "a pnnic"


This blog has endoresed Rick Santrum, and continues to endorse hem. However, this blog has CALLED the nominatin for Mitt Romney, even though this blog will enver suport Romney (even agaisnt Presdient Obama, altugh the blog will never support Obama either).


Problem: The above headline is RIDICULOUS. The GOP establishment HAS been "in a panic" at various times and places in this electin campaign. However, it is obvius that they now feel eveyrthing is "under control". Why do you think there are suddenly so many ENDORSEMENTS from GOP politicians for Romney?


Santroum could get little attentio for what HE SAID when it could have mattered--the only "attention" gong to the MEDIA AGENDA labelling Santourm as a "social issues" candidate. Why suddenly pay attention to THIS obvius false assertion (now), at the time it is LEAST ture?


I have already told you that the media is getting ready to PIVOT into "ATTACK Romney" mode. That is why CNN recently paid so much attentino (a "panel" yet) to that unimportant 'story" about Roney carrying his dog on top of his carr. (in a carrier).


The full-fledged ATTACK has not yet begun, since the media still wants a STAKE in the heart of conservatives before PIVOTING for good. Plus, the electin is not until NOVEMBER (which does not keep a DISHOENST media from HYPING present opinion polls on even HYPOTHETICAL matchups in November).


The quest, as usual, is: Are the members of the mainstream media, inlcuding the sources for Yaho "News", dishonest, or just incompetent. I, aS you know, vote for BOTH. This "stoy" has been on Yahoo "News" (in their "featured" "top stories") almost all dlay. Yet, it is a NOTHING story, whihc is obviusly not ture (as far as the GOP "establishment" NOW panicking"). Can the media possibly be worried about being UNFAIR to SantoruM? Too late for that.


No. My conclusoin is probably right: this is jsut a DIG at Romney. There is yeat another Yahoo "featured" "top story" now about how Romnney is getting "tepid endorsements". So Waht? It shows that the ducks are lining up in a row for Romney, and the race for the nomination is over (as this blog has called it). I wish it were not so, but it is. Barring some sort of Louisiana debacle (being found in bed with a "live boy or a dead girl"), Romney cannot now lose. Oh, I am exaggerating slightly. If Romney were to be "found in bed" with evena LIVE GIRL--not his wife--it would probably be over for him. But Romney seems to have led an unblemished private life, and this kind of "scandal" seems unlikely. That is not to say that some "scandals" may not be MANUFACTURED for the general election, but Romhney can no longer be derailed from the nomination wihtout a MAJOR, obvious scanddal.


Hey. When this blog CALLS it, it is OVER (much more reliably than when the media tells you something). Remember, this blog CALLED it BEFORE the Illinois primary, and came close to doing so BEFORE OHNIO (after Michigan--which was Santourm's last real "game changing" shbot, and he came close).