In case you had not hard, a Texas prison inmate got 40% of the vote in the West Virginia Presidential primary yesterday: the DEMOCRATIC Presdietnial primary, against President Obama.
Does this mean that basically ANYONE in Texas, including the inmates of our prisons (maybe even Rick Perry, although that is more problematic), would be a better President than Barack Obama? As a resident of Texas--so long as you consider El Paso part of Texas--for the past 40 years or so, I can tell yu that this is a CORRECT judgment by 40% of the voters of West Virginia.
Of course this vote was meaningless, except as an indication that the CORRUPT media is composed mainly of liars (as they continue to talk about how EVEROYONE "likes" President Obama). West Virginiga voters, however, have accomoplished one MAJOR benefit for the rest of us. Remember all of those stories about how many people are voting against Mitt Romney, even though he is clearly the GOP nominee? The CORRUPT, DISHONEST media want to tell you that means something. It does nto. This West Viirginia vote makes our media look like the FOOLS they are, whenever they talk about anti-Romney "protest" votes as having any real significance. EVERY time they do that, the response is obvius: "hey, 40% of the DEMOCRATIC voters in West Virginiia prefer a Texas inmate to Barack Obama. The man is poison to a significant part of the American population.".
Thank you, voters of West Virgini. Oh, I know that the media is out there trying to say it is the VOTERS who are "crazy", rather than our media. But readers of this blog--not to mention voters--know the truth. Our media, are composed of some of the most CORRUPT, DISHONEST people who have ever lived. Despite the crazy people in our media, you can't give more significance to a "protest" vote than it deserves. But this particular "protest" vote does give the LIE to the media "storyline" that "everyone likes Obama".
P.S. No proofreading or spell checkng (bad eyesight).