Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Global Warming: Not This Year

"Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966."

The above is from a Canadian Newspaper (National Post: see link on Drudge). "Global Warming" anyone? Melting arctic?  Remember those summer stories about how the North Pole ice cap was melting more than ever before (only to refreeze faster than normal this winter).?

Michael Cricton's chart ("State of Fear") continues to prove correct;  There is NO warming TRND in the U.S. since 1880.  Januaary was .3 degrees COOER than normal (NASA fiugures) in the U.S.  There is now yet another snow storm across the norther U.S.  2006 was an average termperature year for the U.S. (average since the 19th Century), with a COOL winter and spring, and cool December. 

I keep pointing this out because the mainstream media does not.  When the weather is COOL, or even COLD, it is just weather.  When the weather is WARM, it is because of "global warming".

Do you need any more evidence that "global warming" is a RELIGIOUS/POLITICAL movement, rather than "science"?  Consider this PROPAGANDA attempt to change the term from "global warming" to "climate change" (even though there is no such thing as a "global warming" theory of CLIMATE--the connection between "global warming" and climate is not clear at all). 

Does this show that the "global warming" propagandists are NERVOUS about this idea of a consistent warming trend?  Sure it does. They want to separate "global warming" from the idea of "warming", and instead use "climate change"--knowing that the weather ALWAYS CHANGES-as does the climate.

Problem:  There is NO established theory of "climate change".  The vague concept of "global warming" is based on the idea that greenhouse gases cause a WARMING effect.  The ONLY EVIDENCE for this concept (hardly a full fledged theory) that this greenhouse gas WARMING will cause the earth to "heat up" is warming temperatures.   In other words, the "evidence" for "global warming" is NOT evidence for general, man-made "climate change".  It is WARMING. If you don't have the WARMING (consistent trend continuing), the "theory" is DISCREDITED.   There is then NO basis for assuming that any "climate change"  is man-made.

No comments: