John Edwards' Love Child and other Taboo Media Topics

"Two former CIA officers Tuesday denied that they or the spy agency faked an Iraqi intelligence document purporting to link Saddam Hussein with 9/11 bomber Mohammed Atta, as they are quoted as saying in a new book.

The White House issued the statement on behalf of the former officials after a day of adamant denials from the CIA and Bush administration about the claim, made in "The Way of the World," a book by Washington-based journalist Ron Suskind."

 

Isn't the above MARVELOUS (sarcasm) "journalism" in th emodern style.  The story was previously even WORSE, headlined "Bush Administration Denies Faking Iraq Letter".  Of course, there was never any EVIDENCE of such a faked letter.  There was just this unsupported allegation in a book by a KNOWN LEFTIST "journalist".  This is the ind of thing the "Anti-American, Despicable Associated Press", and AOL, routinely ignore unless it fits into their agenda (like the KOREAN WAR stories by the AP I described today and Sunday, and will continue to describe this week).

Have you seen a headline:  "John Edwards DNIES allegations that he fathered love chiild while his wife had cancer?"  For that matter, have you seen headlines that "Barack Obama DENIES Allegatons in Sensational New Book?"

Of course you have not, because the SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITES of the mainstream media BURY "news" they don't like, and HYPE more questonable stuff they do like.

The National Enquirer, on MORE evidence, has aleged that Edwards just visited his mistress and love child (running from reporters in a scene right out of a bedroom farce).  Thre IS a sensational new book:  "The Case Against Barack Obama", by David Freddoso (not to mention Dick Morris' "Fleeced") trashing the political carerer of Barack Obama.  But the mainstream media won't even ASK about those things, while writing a story like this as to an allegation DENIED by ALL parties to the letter in question (including George Tenanat).

You should have CONTEMPT for these people, and AOL "News".  It is one thing to refuse to pay any attention to ANY of this stuff.  It is another thing to be the sanctimonious hypcrites that these mainstream media people are--intellectual whores of the first order.

If today's "journalists start ASKING John Edwards, Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton,  and the rest to explain themselves on the same basis they ask Republicans and "right wing" evangelicals to explain themselves, I might have a modicum of respect for them.   As it is, I have no respect at all.  It is no accident that people think LESS of them than they think of Nancy "Total Failure" Pelosi (much less President Bush).

P.S.  It is the National Equirer, with SUPERIOR standards to ordinary "journalists" today, which broke the story about Jesse Jackson's "love child".  Lest you forget (easy to do), Jackson profeses to be a ministerof the Gospel.  The New York Times, after trying to ingore the story, eventually buried a paragraph on page 23 (or somehwere like than).  Yes, that is the SAME paper that put RUMORS about an affair by John McCain on page 1--picked up by the truly despicable AP and AOL as legitimate "allegations".